How much better is Intel Pentium 4 Northwood 2 6 GHz than Intel Celeron 2 0 GHz?

Let me explain it to you first: Intel Pentium 4 (Northwood) GHz is (Ben 4 Northwood core, 130nm process, main frequency, front-side bus 400MHz, L2 cache 512KB, 478-pin interface); Intel Celeron GHZ is (Celeron 4 North Wood Core, 130nm process, main frequency, FSB 400MHz, L2 cache 128KB, 478-pin interface).And then make a comparison:

The comparative performance of the processor is mainly from 4 aspects, 1 is the second-level cache (manifested in the performance of multi-** performance and playing large games, which is the performance of the so-called processor floating point computing ability), 2 is the main frequency (manifested in the speed of office software applications, this is the performance of the so-called processor integer computing ability), 3 front-side bus (determines the memory connection processor bandwidth), 4 is the production process (determines the power consumption). Therefore, it is concluded that the performance of Ben 4 Erslow 512k) is much stronger than that of Yang 4 Erslow 128k.

Finally, I would like to emphasize: under the Netbrest architecture of Ben 4 (Sai 4), the capacity of the L2 cache is the most important point, and the Celeron 4 second slow is only 128KB is 1 4 of Ben 4A and 2 2, so the main frequency of Celeron 4 is only about 1 2 higher than Ben 4a 1 2 (such as the performance of Celeron 4 is equivalent to Ben 4a), and the performance is comparable. The Celeron you said is equivalent to Ben 4 at most, so Ben 4 (2 slow 512kb) is better than Celeron 4 (ordinary Celeron 4 2 slow 128kb, Celeron 4D 2 slow 256kb).

Now the new Super Celeron (such as Celeron 420) has only reached 512KB in the second slow.

Good is for sure, but it can't be doubled

The first is that the main frequency should be higher, and secondly, the second-level cache of the Pentium should be high, which determines that its processing speed is significantly higher than that of Celeron, and then they use different core technologies. How many times better is the specific, it is rarely said that, generally the performance is superior, and there are some special testing software that can measure the comprehensive score for comparison.

That's an increase of more than 40%.

The performance of the Celeron GHZ is similar to that of the P4.

In terms of frequency, it is 600 m hertz higher. That is, in the usual use, Ben Si is faster at the same time, Ben Si secondary cache is 512k, Celeron this is only 128k, when complex operations, the effect of Ben Si's larger secondary cache can be brought into play, Ben Si is stronger, but for current use, it will not be obvious.

If it is an upgrade of the same platform, the performance improvement is still obvious. It's worth upgrading.

Hello main parameters.

Model: Pentium4 box).

Chip factory side. intel

Interface type. socket 478

Core type. northwood

Production process. 130 nm.

Core voltage. The main frequency has a prize to find mistakes.

External frequency 200MHz

Multiply 14x L1 cache.

l1 = 20 L2 cache.

l2=512

Front-side bus frequency.

800mhz

Thank you Dali Prefecture hereafter.

Pentium Intel CPU Appearance Time Celeron --- Pentium --- Core, CPU is useless just looking at the main frequency.

Pentium 4 is a 512k L2 cache with a low frequency and an advantage when multiple programs are running at the same time, while Celeron is a 256k L2 cache. The frequency is high, but the multitasking is slightly worse, and in overall comparison, P4 is better, because, twice the L2 cache, the CPU work efficiency is 40% higher.

The higher the processing speed, the better. Computer things are generally the higher the number, the better, this is what my teacher at the technical school said.

P4 is Pentium 4 single-core, and the other is Core, which is a generation ahead of Pentium.

At the same frequency, they are all Ben Si good. Not to mention the higher frequency of Bensi.

00 is significantly stronger than P4, because 3300 is a new architecture and process, and it is superior in performance and power consumption** is about 260 yuan. P4 is only a few dozen dollars.

are obsolete and not of comparable value.

Pentium4 This is good, because in Celeron it is just a chicken rib in Intel and I don't want to buy it! Master Lu test can't decide the use of performance,If you feel that it's not as good as Celeron,Then I think,This should just be the feeling of LZ on the score,In actual use,P4 is much more stable than Celeron's performance,As for overclocking, it depends on what kind of motherboard it is,The motherboard is different,Overclocking methods are not the same。

It's a single-core CPU, but it uses hyper-threading technology, so in the device manager, it's a fake dual-core with dual CPUs.

It's definitely the Pentium 4 that is better, and the Pentium Race Young is more high-end.

The 478CPU is good, but now it looks like it's just as insufficient.

Anyway, it's all antique, no matter how good it is, it's not enough.