Sony T300, T77, W300, W170 Which camera is better?

The W300 is out of stock in many places, but it has the largest CCD area.

T300 is better to go directly into T700 or T77, forget it Other opinions are the same as above.

The W170 has a wide angle with five times the light variation.

The W300 doesn't have five times, it's only three times.

I'd like to get my hands on the W300

I've been thinking about this for a long time.

The T300 is about to be discontinued, so I won't consider it.

The selling point of T77 is the thinnest DC, I think it's better for girls to use, of course, if it's thin, it won't be good for standby.

This is also a common problem of the T series.

The W300 has a lot of pixels.

The W170 has a wide angle, which is more practical.

But after I think about it.

I still prefer the T77, it's more beautiful.

Although T300 is fashionable, the periscope lens CCD size is only 1, not as good as W300, and the touch screen is not very convenient, W3001 CCD with 13.6 million pixels should be good, since you like telescopic lenses, or W300 is better, I personally prefer W300, I don't know the difference between T series and W series**.

Although it is 10.1 million pixels.

But the results of the seven or eight megapixel shots are not clear.

I'll start with the upstairs question.

Whether it's Sony's problem or not, but what you say shows that you're an absolute layman. If you explain it to Sony customer service like this, I won't change it for you.

Whether the effect is good or not, what is the relationship between clarity and pixels??? The pixel generally only determines the size and clarity of the original image, and the quality of the imaging has little to do with the pixels.

First of all, I suggest that the "Tohoku Ichiro" friends start with themselves to see if they are not using the camera well. Don't complain about something else first. If you are given a 6 million pixel Nikon SLR, it is estimated that you will still say that the effect is not good.

Now let's talk about the landlord.

One is a card player and the other is an ordinary camera. In terms of imaging, it seems to be W300 good (from my point of view), but this little bit of goodness is generally difficult to find, unless you compare the original size ** every day. Therefore, in general terms of application, there is no difference between the two cameras.

My advice is to choose from the appearance, which is much easier than the image quality. One is a telescopic lens and the other is a periscope lens, and the difference in appearance is very obvious.

Summary. Hello <>

In terms of camera specs and performance, the Sony W800 is a bit better than the W730. First of all, the W800 has a higher pixel count for sharper shots. Secondly, it is equipped with a faster lens that enables better imaging in lower light conditions.

In addition, the W800 also has a larger optical zoom range, as well as a faster autofocus speed, which makes it perform better in different photography scenarios.

Which one is better, Sony W730 or W800.

Hello <>

In terms of camera specs and performance, the Sony W800 is a bit better than the W730. First of all, the W800 has a higher pixel count for sharper shots. Secondly, it is equipped with a faster lens for better imaging results in lower light conditions.

In addition to this backfill, the W800 also has a larger optical zoom range and a faster autofocus speed, which makes it perform better in different photography scenarios.

Hello, Sony W730 and W800 are both entry-level digital cameras, and they both have similar features and capabilities. However, from the point of view of technical parameters, the W800 is slightly ahead of the W730. Also, if you pay attention to the exterior design, the W800 is also more stylish than the W730.

Personal advice and opinions for your reference:

Sony T77, T300, T500, T700 models, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is the same, 1 inch, although the number of pixels is slightly different, there is no major substantive difference in the actual imaging effect, basically the same type, the same grade model.

Sony T77, T300, T500, T700 are all using periscope lens (caused by the particularity of the lens structure) card machine, the imaging effect is slightly lower than the telescopic lens, such as the Sony W series card machine.

Sony T77, T300, T500, T700 are fully automatic cameras, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, but can cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments through various shooting modes pre-made in the machine, but in the case of poor light, especially in shooting night scenes, it will be inadequate, but generally home models are fully competent.

In terms of cost performance and practicality, Sony T77 is higher,**Around 1800 yuan,Focus on the appearance of Sony T700,More delicate and fashionable,**At about 2500 yuan。 (Sony T700 as the largest buy point of 920,000 pixels of 16:9 ratio, inch TFT.)

Sony T77, T300, T500, T700 at this price, you may wish to pay attention to Sony W300,**Around 2400 yuan,Better performance,The main advantage is that the size of the sensor CCD is relatively large,About 1 inch,(Sony T77、T300、T500、T700 is only 1 inch),Large-size sensor with more than 10 million high resolutions,It can really bring higher quality imaging effects,In addition to a variety of shooting modes pre-typed in the machine, It has a comprehensive manual shooting function, and you can integrate more into the effect you want when shooting, and the fun and space of shooting will be greater, especially when shooting pure night photos, after manually adjusting **, aperture, ISO and other parameters, the resulting photo picture effect is clear and clean without any noise, which is Sony T77, T300, T500, T700 with a so-called program mode (commonly known as point-and-shoot mode) camera shooting similar to night mode can not be compared.

Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, and the lead that suits you is the best, and you can compare them according to your own price and preferences.

T700 but not as easy to use as T900** is not much worse.

I recommend also buying the T900 because of the performance of the 900.

Much better than 700 now.

The 700 is the unit that comes with 4G memory.

That's not good. And the 900 is with 2G of RAM.

The sensitivity of the touch screen is good now!

I personally use the t77

T200It shouldn't be available,And 700It's really too "advanced",T77The configuration is already very luxurious,700Compared with 77, the screen is upgraded,This power consumption problem is really a headache,T77It is already very power-consuming。 The general camera 230,000 resolution is enough,There's no need to go out 90 tens of thousands,This just lets you buy a few more pieces of Sony's original electricity,A piece of more than 200,The built-in 4G card is meaningless,In terms of cost performance77 and 700 are about the same,But from my experience with 77,T77It's really a good machine to take。 I also recommend the 77 and 900 in the T series

T700 is better, Sony T700 is Sony's latest flagship card digital camera, equipped with 10.1 million pixel CCD image sensor, 4x optical zoom periscope lens, inch 920,000 pixel widescreen LCD, hardware performance has reached the peak of ultra-thin card machine. What's even more rare is that the Sony T700 has such performance while the thickness of the fuselage is only the thinnest. The ultra-thin and metallic body gives the Sony T700 a stunning feel.

Now let's see if the Sony T700 has the strength to win the title of the strongest card DC.

The performance and appearance are good T77, or how can it be more expensive than W170 more than 300, it can only be said that W170 is not bad cost performance.