Which one is better, Sony T77, W170 or Panasonic FX36

Landlord, I suggest you buy a Canon or a Nikon, I think their cameras are better than Sony's! You recommend several mainstream ones: if you are a photography enthusiast, buy the Nikon P5100 It is a professional camera very cost-effective and fun but it costs 2200!

I also recommend 3 models to you: Nikon's S600, Canon's X80, and Sony's T77

If you pay attention to cost-effective scenes, S600 is better with a wide angle Its response speed is very fast Comprehensive strength **The clarity is quite good!

If you value the appearance and fashion, the T77 is more suitable for sliding operation, with touch screen, smiley shutter or something!

If you value the brand value, Canon's is also very good, the ixus80 is very average, it is the Canon X series, the cost performance is very high, and the effect is not much worse than other models, after all, they are all consumer-grade digital cameras!

You can go to Bubble.com and look at their specific parameters, I won't copy them, so as not to affect the judgment of the landlord, what type to buy is mainly in what you value!

If you buy it for home use or to take pictures, I recommend you buy the S600, which is what I bought, it really works! The 3 models I introduced are all selling very well and have a good reputation!

The ones I introduced are all very good models that they sell separately, and they are absolutely cost-effective!

Now the A650 is only 1800, and the A650 is also very good, you can consider it!

When considering it, pay attention to the size of the ccd and it will affect the clarity! Choose optical image stabilization for image stabilization! The best brands are Nikon and Canon's! A zoom factor of 4x would be fine!

I just use Panasonic FX36,The appearance is simple and generous,**And reasonable,The function is more practical,Shoot**It's also very clear,I like it a lot,The only deficiency is that the night scene effect is not ideal。

I just bought a Sony T77 and I feel good about Sony. The shooting effect is also good, and the touch screen is also good.

I recommend you buy Sony.

First of all, in ordinary digital cameras, Sony and Canon are first-line big brands, each with its own merits, and the others, including Nikon, are a little worse (personal opinion), so I only say that these 2 brands are good Daoxiang.

I recommend Sony W170

Reason: There is a wide angle ** and it is not expensive.

W170 and T77 ** On the 2 machines are more than 300 different in performance There is not much difference between the two are 1010W pixels What a smiley shutter Smart scene ......

The difference is that T77 flatters the front wheel drive of the T series, and the T70 is the same as the touch screen, and the 3-inch screen is larger, which is definitely more visually comfortable, but the battery of T77 is only more than 600 mA, the screen is large, the battery is small, and the practicality is almost The battery is enough to shoot more than 200 shots.

W170 is an inch screen button type battery with more than 900 mA but the thickness is basically 1 times thicker than T77 (T77 is only 15mm thick, thinner than T700), the contrast is the thickest point.

In fact, the main difference between the two is the appearance and vision, T77 is more fashionable, more portable, looks more classy, and W170 is more practical.

In addition, there are also Canon's ixus80 85 and so on in the same grade.

Sony's machine is inferior to Canon, but it's not that Canon is better than Sony.

For card machines, the imaging performance is about the same, and it depends on luck to shoot moving objects.

Because the shutter is not adjustable, when the light is good, or when the light is good, it can shoot well, and when the light is bad, ......

Color bias is a characteristic of manufacturers, Sony thinks consumers like bright colors, Canon thinks consumers like light colors.

Canon's irritability is better controlled, Canon's imaging is soft, because of noise reduction, shooting people is not bad, shooting landscapes is not sharp enough, not as good as Nikon.

Generally speaking, as long as the focus is accurate, the shooting is clear (within 100% magnification, more than 100% will definitely be blurry).

The stabilization is indeed about the same, and the caliber of the CCD lens is about the same.

Macro is mainly used to shoot flowers and plants, and sometimes it is also used to shoot information and ID cards.

After all, it's a card machine, and the difference in macro distance is not too big, and the picture should be a good point for Canon.

The night scene is the same, you can only define the shutter ISO can barely shoot, and it is estimated that it will not achieve the effect you want.

And the average user doesn't necessarily know how to operate it.

I just bought the W170 recently and it turned out to be better than I expected.

When I bought it, I also referred to the A2000 of the T77 Canon, and the 2000 completely disappointed me to the top.

Appearance: Sony's machine is indeed much better than Canon's In terms of photo quality, Canon is better, but this is not a big difference, not a professional, and I can't tell the difference, Sony's pursuit of bright colors and fashionable appearance Canon pursues a professional photo effect It depends on how you choose Other brands of digital are not recommended.

The types of the four models are different.

Sony T77 and Samsung i100 are one of a kind.

W170 and FX36 are one of a kind.

I don't like Sony cameras, there are too many inflated components.

It is recommended to buy the Panasonic FX36

Choose between W170 and FX38 the look you like.

Me too, w179 and Canon's 80is comparison!!

I haven't decided yet???

The W170 has been reduced in price, and the performance is not bad.

Panasonic FX36 is recommended, ultra-wide-angle, Leica lens, and the signal-to-price ratio is high.

The landlord likes the Canon 80 and I think this is good.

Lesson to the landlord: the higher the pixel of the camera, the better, the higher the pixel will produce more noise, which has a great impact on the image quality. Now those 8 million cameras are completely sufficient, and the landlord should not be involved in printing large-size ** things, hehe, so this Canon 80 is still very cost-effective, small, and the imaging quality is excellent

In addition, the Sony T series is an ultra-thin card machine that takes the fashion route. The W series is a traditional digital camera. And Panasonic's FX36 is also very good.,I like Panasonic's stuff very much.,Beautiful appearance plus Leica-certified lens (that's what I use),Hehe,The disadvantage is that there is a little more noise。

The pixel doesn't matter, the image quality is more important.

Sony two, the former is more cost-effective, but the latter has the best appearance, and the overall effect of the shot is actually difficult to distinguish without looking carefully.

But you said you like Canon.,I don't know if it's because of the appearance or the brand or the performance, if you're not professional enough, it's recommended to be T77.,It's easy to look at and never get tired of it.,It's also generous and fashionable to take it out.。

I don't know what the appearance of the home team looks like, but to be honest, Sony and Panasonic really can't compare with Canon.

Canon's imaging effect Canon's color reproduction is definitely incomparable to Sony's.

So it is advisable for landlords to buy Canon.

I think FX36 is better, the night scene of the card machine is not very good, and the technology is more important than the camera to shoot the night scene with the card machine.

In terms of image quality alone, the W170 may be a little better, the optical zoom is also larger, and it has a smiley shutter function, and the screen is also slightly larger.

But the wide angle of the W170 is 28mm, the FX36 is wider, and the aperture of the 25mm W170 is smaller, while the FX36 is.

The W170 uses Sony's MSD, which is more expensive and has poor versatility, and the FX36 uses the most common SDHC card.

In terms of appearance, I think FX36 is much more beautiful.

These two wide-angle cameras,There should be their own advantages,It's also difficult to distinguish between the real shot sample comparison,But relative to me, I feel that the Panasonic FX36 picture is more transparent,The color reproduction is more natural,The macro is also better than W170,From the shape design, I think it is still SonyW170 to be excellent,The workmanship is also more exquisite,It's really difficult to decide one of the two,But if I want to choose, I still choose Panasonic FX36,,

Although I am using T300 now, I still strongly recommend you to use W300, because, T300 battery time is not very long, because the screen is too big, and the recorded ** is sometimes difficult to find in the machine, and it can only be seen in the computer folder, depressed!! What's more important is that the W300 is a telescopic lens, with a wide angle, which is cool to shoot the scenery! And the T300 is a periscope, you can imagine for yourself which one has better image quality!

But these are still based on personal preferences, if you like fashion, choose Sony, if you pay more attention to picture quality, choose Canon is the best! But which ** buy w170 you are talking about now, buy t300 and w300 don't think about it for a long time, if you can really buy it, then i don't know what level of water it has reached for a long time! Even if you wait until the National Day 1800, don't want to buy T300, if you are really in which **, why not consider Canon's 860 or 80is, I have tried it before, and the effect is also very good, especially 80is is also very fashionable, the picture quality has nothing to say, in fact, I will tell you, those who know how will not pursue too high pixels, generally 800 is enough, because you usually just look at the photo on the computer, or develop the photo, but you will not often rush to a photo as big as a wedding photo, So tens of millions of pixels become decorations!

If you look at the professional SLR, many of them are not only 8 million, but the lens and other aspects are more advanced. Don't lie to you, I use a lot of high-end things, you are now a student, I am also a young person, I know what you think, but it is highly recommended that you buy Canon ixsus 80is, it is enough, not only fashion can also meet your shooting requirements, now we can get it in Chengdu for 1500, not to mention saving money, you can use the money you save to buy the rest of the equipment, such as a tripod for the camera (convenient for yourself or group photography), memory card, battery, card reader, screen protector, These are very necessary to buy extraordinarily. Of course, if you really want to buy, it is recommended that you use W170, which fully meets your requirements, it is both a periscope and a wide angle, which can shoot grander scenes, how good!

Wide-angle is understood metaphorically like a person looking at something, and the general lens is equivalent to us putting our hands on both sides of our eyes to see things, and the part of the afterglow cannot be seen. And the wide angle is equivalent to taking your hand away to see things, seeing the part of the eye that is in the afterglow, and the field of vision is wider

W170 is good **Affordable.

And cost-effective.

Panasonic is recommended for the pursuit of picture quality, and Sony's pursuit of product appearance.

Panasonic FX35 is a new machine that has just been put on the city this year,All configurations and functions are relatively good,CCD size and pixels are the predecessor FX33There are different degrees of improvement,The wide angle even reached25mm,And the imaging is also very good,But the noise control is not ideal,And SonyW170It is Sony's first card machine with a wide range,The workmanship of the whole machine and the design of the shed are very in place。 The imaging is also medium-range, and there are no obvious shortcomings, only the macro is more general. It can be said that it is indeed difficult to choose between the two, but I am personally more optimistic about Sony W170.

Strongly do not recommend Sony, Sony's card machine is a vase, card machine wide-angle lens, Panasonic Zhengzai type is undoubtedly the best! The lens of FX36 is 25mm ultra-wide angle, 10 million pixels, 4x optics, 1280*720@30 frames of Gao Qi Laqing shooting and guessing image, and supports SDHC card, SDHC card currently has 16G ** on the market!

Haha, Sony's appearance does appeal to some ladies, but don't you think it's cheesy? If Mrs. attaches great importance to appearance, you can also take a look at Olympus, Casio, all of which are fashionable, and Olympus also has a three-defense function. Panasonic FX36 has a good wide angle, great practical value, I think Panasonic's thinking is still very good, striving for first-class lens specifications, and the workmanship of the body is good, which is worthy of praise.

But I'm disappointed with its performance in controlling noise,You can actually try it,See if the imaging effect is acceptable,It's best to compare Canon,It is estimated that the average person can also accept it,If you think the picture quality is not much worse than Canon, buy 36,Otherwise, buy 80,It's very cost-effective,Canon's imaging is also the safest,If you want a wide angle, consider 860.

After I went through the battlefield of digital BBS several times, I still have a relatively good impression of Canon 80... Anyone with a little bit of digital knowledge should know that the camera is better than the Canon and Nikon!

It is recommended that you take a look at the Olympus 1010 and be sure to see the real thing to ensure that you do not regret it. Sony's entertainment function is relatively strong, the appearance is incomparable, and the Canon professional machine is better, but it is not very practical for home use.

Personally, I like Sony, probably because I use Sony.

Of course, the cost performance is the best in Canon.