Friends, what do you think about the militarized and closed management of university campuses?

I don't agree with this kind of management of the university campus, everyone is an adult, they can be responsible for their own actions, everyone has their own freedom and should not be restrained, and the university is also a small society, in the university is for everyone to get in touch with the society as soon as possible and integrate into this society as soon as possible.

Incomprehensible ... This is to isolate people from society.

Actually, the so-calledMilitarized managementIt is to deprive of liberty. Because complete freedom is a horror, it is necessary to be directed and controlled.

The advantage of liberal education is uncertainty, and the disadvantage is also uncertainty. If you don't have a purpose, you don't know what you want to train your students to, and only God knows about it, but God's ability is stronger than that of people, and the people who create it may not even be able to imagine, which is an advantage.

The disadvantage is also obvious, the child may not fit in, not because he can't fit into the group, but because he will contradict the group's tendency to concentrate. Take the army as an example, the first duty of the army is to fight in unity, obedience is necessary, and all actions are aimed at achieving this goal. If there is really a war, whoever messes up, many details can't be managed, but the core that has been maintained for a long time will not disappear.

In exam-oriented education.

In the eyes of most teachers, parents, and schools, at least in the eyes of most teachers, parents, and schools, grades are the first core, and militarized management is adopted in order to ensure that the first core of existence can be guaranteed.

Speaking of the impact on social skills, the impact on this aspect is actually not much, three people are enough, and those who can be fenced can be said to be a society.

But in terms of independence, there will be, autonomy requires the desire of the core of the self, and in this regard, militarized management has the element of dissipating desire, once the desire is consumed, independence is impossible. But it's hard to say what kind of desire is consumed, everyone's desire is different, if the student is more active and likes to explore and discover, experimental operation, the school may consume this desire, but if the student himself likes to read and think quietly, it seems to have no effect.

Autonomy must be self-oriented, as for whether the inner master of the student and the outer master of the school are the same, it is difficult to say, it depends on the student himself, just do not spend it. It is better to see that some people understand autonomy as more like self-care, and in this respect it is militarized.

Very simple examples, whether a slave is self-caring or a slave owner is self-care, whether a slave owner is self-conscious or a slave is self-sufficient, and nothing else means a slightly more extreme example.

First: I feel that the militarized management of the school is very useful when I come out of the school, at least I can exercise a person's patience, as well as the habit of being strict with myself, and I have a regular study and life every day, which is very helpful for my future work.

Second: on the one hand, the management of the school has helped to improve self-control, and the purpose is also very clear, more practical and serious learning, after entering the society, this spirit of concentration has been affecting themselves, and they are more handy in their careers.

If it is a military school, soldiers are obedience to orders, and the tasks they need to complete need to be completed in a team. At least militarized management can unify everyone's behavior, so that everyone can obey the command, and it is also a constraint on the previously lazy self.

On the surface, the militarized management of the school makes children more self-disciplined and more disciplined, but it has to be said that this militarized management method also suppresses the children's nature and makes them unable to fully exert their creativity.

I feel like my school is very well balanced.

Militarization of dormitory sanitation has improved the living environment, while dormitory management is still managed by the dormitory management, retaining a certain degree of humanity.

I don't think the necessity of military training management in schools is too great, because the most important thing for students is their creativity and innovation ability. This is very undesirable for the future growth of students.

As an individual, of course, I like to be free and slow, but as a collective, we must have a collective spirit, which is an important factor in the militarized management of the school.

I am more in favor of it, because during the school period, I am more strictly managed, I can regulate my words and deeds, make myself better, and develop good habits, which is of great benefit to my future work and life.

Today's militarized management of schools is becoming more and more serious, especially in high schools, because the college entrance examination is based on results, and the school values its own number of uplines, and efficient management can increase the proportion of students. For students, they can use their time more effectively.

I think there are pros and cons to a militarized management university, and I think there is nothing wrong with a military school that trains officers and soldiers, after all, people want to train soldiers who absolutely obey orders.

However, I don't think it's necessary for some ordinary colleges and universities to imitate the militarized management of military schools, although it has certain advantages in the unified management of schools, but it also has certain disadvantages in the ideological and social development of students!