After snatching money in a taxi, in the process of escaping, is it justified defense for the driver

It is not justifiable self-defense. Justifiable defense is instinctive defense when one's own life is threatened or harmed. Although the suspect robbed you of your money and escaped, your life is not in danger. Therefore, if you hit it, it is too much defense.

It is certainly not justified self-defense, and if the robber is seriously injured, it will be prosecuted as the crime of intentional injury, and the punishment should be mitigated.

Running away after snatching money in a taxi, and then hitting someone with a car is not justifiable because he is no longer a threat to you.

1. If the suspect is robbing and the victim is in danger, hitting and killing the robber with a car is justified defense and does not bear legal responsibility.

2. Driving into a robber, after he was robbed, the nature of the incident changed, and it violated the law, because it was a crime to drive and hit someone to death when the harmful act no longer existed, that is, the suspect escaped.

It is a legitimate defense, one's money is being infringed upon, and the robbery is to recover one's money.

Judging from your simple expression, it has the nature of legitimate defense. However, whether it can be legally recognized as legitimate defense needs to be judged in conjunction with other evidence.

Clearly not justified self-defense. The constituent element of justifiable defence is that the offense is about to occur or is occurring. The money grabber has fled, indicating that the illegal infringement has ended.

The person who was robbed is weak and can only rely on the car he is driving, which is justified defense, but if he continues to run over after being hit, it is not justified defense.

It is not justified defense, and only when the money grabber acts in a way that threatens his or her life is called justifiable defense.

It is not justified defense, and if it is a thief, it is also responsible.

This is not justified defense. Do you know what normality means? That is, at the time, any means of defense you use, including any means of attacking him, can be called legitimate defense.

But **did not use any violence against you**, and did not use any violent means against you, you went to attack him, which is not justified defense.

It should be justified defense, because you're chasing a robber, and hitting someone is of course justified defense.

After a property offense is completed, there is still room for legitimate defense.

Although the property offense has already been committed, and the perpetrator is discovered at the scene and promptly pursued, it is deemed that the unlawful offense continues until the illegally obtained property is hidden in a place where it is difficult for others to discover, and the pursuer may use force to recover the property and become upright and defensive.

It is justified self-defense.

Criminal law. Article 20: [Justifiable Defense] Where conduct taken to stop unlawful infringement is taken in order to protect the state, the public interest, or the person, property, or other rights of oneself or others from ongoing unlawful infringement, and causes harm to the unlawful offender, it is justified defense and does not bear criminal responsibility.

Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived.

Whoever takes defensive action against an ongoing assault, homicide, robbery, rape, kidnapping, or other violent crime that seriously endangers personal safety, causing an unlawful infringer, is not considered to be in excessive defense and does not bear criminal responsibility.

You can apply for reconsideration, depending on how the law decides.

Probably the situation is that the owner of the road encountered a gangster who was suspected of blocking the road and robbing in the name of asking for "happy cigarettes", and after the owner refused, the other party prevented the owner from leaving and smashed the owner's vehicle. And in the end, the owner of the car hit the other party under the condition of calling the police throughout the whole process.

So the question is, is this a legitimate defense?

How is justifiable defense determined?

If you don't calm down a little, it is very likely that you will become overly defensive, and you will be held legally responsible!

What is over-defense?

It is of utmost importance that after the act of defense against the wrongdoer has been taken, the wrongdoer should not continue to act in defense if the wrongdoer has lost the threat, and at the same time, the act of defense should not clearly exceed the limit of justification, otherwise it would turn into excessive defense or even intentional injury.

Aftermath? The official Weibo of the local ** gave the follow-up results of this incident:

According to the notice, the owner of the camera car was frightened by the behavior of the other three people and stepped on the accelerator by mistake, which was temporarily handled as a traffic accident case; (I give 99 points for this explanation).

The few people who forcibly demanded "happy cigarettes" and smashed cars were investigated and punished by the public security organs. I believe that the difference in nature is well known to the friends.

What should I do if this happens?

What can we do to protect ourselves when our personal safety is threatened? Brother Onion is here to tell you!

First of all, we should be more vigilant, although similar dangers are sudden, they can still be detected in advance, such as taking as few remote country roads as possible.

If you encounter a car stop and robbery, try to drive away as much as possible before the other party has completely blocked both ends of the road.

TipsFor vehicles that do not have an automatic lock function, Brother Onion recommends that you develop a good habit of manually locking the door when you get in the car. Some cars can also use the remote control key or driving computer to set the opening method of the door lock, whether it is fully opened with one button or opened separately.

When you go out, you will inevitably encounter some frictions, and even accidents and emergencies, so you must pay attention to your own safety and learn to protect yourself by reasonable means within the law.