Core i9 9900KS and Core i9 9960X which is good, don t talk about the practical?

It must be i9 9960x is good, with x is the flagship version, just ** is nearly twice as expensive as i9 9900ks, the main frequency can be supersed, so it doesn't make sense to say that it is more than the main frequency, and the other parameters are basically crushing i9 9900ks, just to say that if it's just a general home to buy i9 9900ks, it's okay to go to the flagship version of i9 9960x, which is basically not cost-effective, and it doesn't make any sense to buy a CPU and talk about cost performance at 8k.

Play games on the i9 9900ks main frequency is higher,The game frame rate is higher,In addition to playing games, do other things,For example, if you are engaged in software design or like to open an emulator, you can open a dozen on i9 9960x,But the main frequency is much lower,The game frame rate will be reduced,A few frames to a dozen frames are possible,Look at game optimization。

How to compare the positioning differences, 9900ks is a game tool, and 9960x is a production tool. You asked this question.,If you want to choose one of the two, I recommend 9900ks,Because 8c16t and high frequency play games have nothing to say.,Cutting ** or something is enough.,Because if it's just needed in this area, I won't ask this question or I've already bought 3900x or waited for 3950x.。

The i9 9960x is thirty-two threads and the i9 900ks is sixteen threads. Other parameters are not much different, to say that it is definitely 9960x's much more powerful. None of them are at a level.

Intel Core i9-9900K Compared with i9-9900KF, except for one more UHD630 built-in core graphics card, other parameters remain the same. That is, in terms of performance, the i9-9900K and i9-9900KF are the same, and there are basically no differences. However, the i9-9900KF does not have a built-in core graphics card, so we must match it with a discrete graphics card.

Reference: i9-9900K or i9-9900KF which is better and more suitable, these points are important! You'll know after reading it.

As far as CPU performance is concerned, the performance of the i9-9900kf is basically the same as that of the i9-9900k, with some slight differences and other factors such as the system. With the part of the independent display, the i9-9900KF is still basically the same as the i9-9900K. In comparison, the power consumption growth of the i9-9900K generation is still relatively large, and the comprehensive power consumption will increase by 30%+.

Single-threaded: The i9-9900kf will have slightly lower single-threaded performance than the i9-9900k. Compared with previous products, the i9-9900KF has increased by 15% from the i7-7700K. Considering the frequency of the 7th generation Core, it basically relies on the frequency increase.

Compared with the R7 2700X, the advantage is even more obvious, which can reach about 28%. Compared with the i7-8700K, it is about 9% higher.

Multi-threading: Compared with previous products, the i9-9900KF has nearly doubled the i7-7700K, but the advantage over the R7 2700X is compressed, around 23%, compared with the i7-8700K, the improvement is about 40%.

Manufacturing process: The added cores and improved clock speeds of the 9th Gen Core processors have allowed them to surpass the Core 8th Gen processors, and the processors are getting more and more powerful, but the latest processors are still manufactured on the 14nm process, which first appeared on the Broadwell processors launched in 2014. As a result, with the 10nm process node not going well, Intel can only look elsewhere for performance improvements.

1. The performance of the two is basically the same under the silent frequency, but 9900K comes with a core display UHD630, which supports Intel vPro, stable platform plan, and trusted execution technology, while 9900KF does not support these technologies.

2. Which one is good depends on the character, and if you buy a good physique, you can overclock to a higher frequency, and there is basically no difference between the two without overclocking.

Coreless display core i9-9900kf,Cheaper than i9-9900K is one of its advantages,In addition, there are foreign evaluations that have tested KF's physique is better,But for home use,It's still 9900K。 The so-called ** advantage is actually not much worse.

It's all the same. The difference is that the previous one with integrated graphics can be powered up without a graphics card (or in the event that the graphics card is broken). The latter does not have an integrated graphics card, and it can only be lit up when it is matched with the graphics card. And the latter is cheaper than the former.

i9 9900k with core graphics,**The high point is that you don't have to buy a graphics card to connect the monitor to boot into the system。

i9 9900kf without core graphics ** a little lower, you must install a discrete graphics card with a monitor.

Other parameters are the same, belonging to the same type of chip, there is no comparison.

Many people will say that it is a brazing silicone grease problem, in fact, no matter how serious the selection of this thermal conductive material is, it will not cause a price difference of thousands of yuan, and it can only be said that Intel has determined to go to the end on the road of silicone grease (anyway, silicone grease can also support the heat dissipation ......... of 18 coresNo evaluation, a sigh)

From the actual performance point of view, the i7-6950x is not more powerful than the i9-7900x, the main thing is the competition of the times:

During the period of i7-6950x, the opponent AMD was still in the stage of being pressed to the ground and tortured, and the strongest civilian use was the most powerful FX9590, i7-4790K, i7-6700K and other quad-core models could easily abuse it.

Therefore, as a 10-core civilian flagship, the i7-6950X is sold at a reasonable price.

When the i9-7900X appeared, AMD had already released Ryzen, of which the Ryzen7-1800X reached the level of i7-6900K (8 cores and 16 threads) with less than half of the **, at this time, even if Intel still mastered the most cutting-edge IPC and process, it had no confidence to raise the price significantly.

Most players of the i7 6950x use it at 10 cores, and the i9 9900k uses it with 8 cores. The performance of the single-core i9 is strong, and the game is better, and the i7 has more than 2 cores, so it is better to deal with it more, and the overall performance is about the same. Although they are all made of 14nm, the power consumption of the old architecture is higher, and it is the same when they are overclocked.

In fact, it's better to buy 9900k now, the process is more advanced, not to mention the game, a higher frequency is better than a multi-core There is a specific evaluation of this, the specific performance is between the two and the middle, 6950x, the good is limited, and the actual cost performance is not better than 9900k

The single-core 9900k is stronger, after all, the main frequency is there, which is more suitable for gaming. But the 6950x is a ten-core, with higher multi-core synergy and better in rendering and mapping. At present, the two U** are about the same, with power consumption of 95W and 140W, which depends on your own needs.

Two other points to note are that the 6950X memory is quad-channel and supports up to 128G, but he doesn't have a GPU. The 9900K memory has only two channels, supports up to 64G, and has a core display.

9900k is much stronger, but it is also much more expensive, and you can buy it according to your actual needs.

At last year's autumn conference, Intel launched nine generations of Core processors, of which the flagship is Core i9-9900K, 8 cores and 16 threads, single-core and dual-core acceleration frequencies can reach, so single-core and multi-core performance have set records, Intel officially called it the world's best gaming processor.

Now the Core i9-9900K has been released for almost a year, Intel has not upgraded the desktop version of the 10th generation Core processor, friends released the 7nm Ryzen 3000 series processor last month, in addition to 6 cores, 8 cores also brought 12 cores Ryzen 9 3900X and 16 cores Ryzen 9 3950X processor, but the latter has not yet been listed, and the current flagship is Ryzen 9 3900X.

For the performance of the Core i9-9900K processor and the Ryzen 9 3900X processor, especially the gaming performance, each company released a test last month, and you can take a look at the pinnacle battle of these two processors.

At the recent Games Show in Cologne, Germany, Troy Severson, sales and development manager for PC gaming and VR, said in an interview, "It's fair to say that the Core i9-9900K is still the best gaming processor in the world, and that hasn't changed." ”

Troy Severson also announced the measured performance of a number of games at the scene, and the foreign media attending the meeting said that the Core i9-9900K processor is indeed ahead in most games.

Troy Severson said to **You've heard a lot from our competitors, and I have to be honest and blunt about saying that they've done a good job of closing the gap, but in gaming, we still have the highest performance CPU processors, and we're going to keep it ahead.

Intel's i9-9990XE and i9-9900K are both high-end processors, but there are some notable differences between them.

In terms of the number of cores, the i9-9900XE only has 14 cores and 28 threads, while the i9-9900K has 16 cores and 32 threads. This means that the i9-9900K will have an advantage in multi-threaded pants.

However, in terms of frequency, the i9-9900XE's base frequency is up to all-core acceleration and dual-core acceleration is even higher. The base frequency of the i9-9900K is that the all-core acceleration can be reached. Therefore, in terms of frequency, the i9-9900XE has a significant advantage.

However, the power consumption of the processor is also different. The i9-9900XE has a TDP (Thermal Design Power Consumption) of up to 255W, which places higher demands on both the motherboard and the cooling system. And the i9-9900K has a TDP of 125W, which is obviously easier to control.

In terms of performance, the i9-9900XE is likely to outperform the i9-9900K on multi-threaded applications due to its higher frequency and core count. However, on single-threaded applications, the i9-9900K is likely to continue to lead the way due to its more advanced architecture.

Overall, while the i9-9990XE is an improvement over the i9-9900K in some ways, whether or not it's worth buying also needs to consider your specific needs and scenarios for which you should use it.

Intel's current top-of-the-line HEDT high-end desktop platform processor is i9-9980XE, 14nm process, LGA2066 interface, with 18 cores and 36 threads, frequency. A few days ago, Intel had another i9-9990XE processor, which also belongs to the Core X series.

Judging from the model of 9990, it should be higher than 9980 in terms of specifications, but I didn't expect this processor to only have 14 cores and 28 threads, cut 4 cores, frequency, L3 cache, TDP255W, which is 90W higher than i9-9980XE.

According to the source, the i9-9990XE will not be introduced to the general retail market, but only to system integrators, and will be sold in an auction manner, which will be held once a quarter. Liquid-based.

Viewpoint:

Judging from the specifications, the i9-9990XE is more like the frequency boost version of the i9-9940X, but because it is still a 14nm process, it will definitely sacrifice some power consumption if you want to increase the frequency, which is why the i9-9990XE will be 90WTDP more than the i9-9980XE and i9-9940X.

Tonight, Intel officially released the Core i9-9900KS processor, which is another 5GHz processor from Intel after the Core i7-8086K was launched last yearThe difference is that this time it is an 8-core, 16-thread, all-core accelerated 5GHz processor, the strongest gaming processor upgradeFinish.

In terms of architecture and process, the Core i9-9900KS processor is not much new, it is still 14nm++ process, Coffee Lake-S architecture, 8 cores and 16 threads,Base frequency, all-core acceleration frequencyIn contrast, the Core i9-9900K processor is the base frequency, all-core acceleration, single-core, dual-core acceleration frequency.

But the price of the Core i9-9900KS processor is:TDP power consumption has been increased to 127W, compared to the Core i9-9900K processor is 95W.

The performance of the Core i9-9900KS processor is undoubtedly the strongest of the current desktop 8 cores, according to the official statement, compared with the PC 3 years ago, the performance of the Core i9-9900KS processor is increased by 27% when gaming, streaming** and recording.

Game aspect,Compared to the computer of 3 years ago, the Core i9-9900KS processor has a 35% increase in frame rates