Can you accept a second child with the woman s surname?

I can accept a second child with a daughter, and I don't think it's a big deal.

In real life, there are many single-child families due to policy reasons. However, as time goes on and policies change, many families put some hope in their daughters' children, which I think is acceptable.

Family harmony requires both husband and wife to feel happy. I once talked about a girlfriend from an only daughter family, and our relationship was going well at that time, and at one point it came to the stage of talking about marriage. At that time, we used to discuss this issue.

Because she is an only child, her parents have always expected her to have a child with her surname. She was a little apprehensive when she mentioned it to me, but I didn't think it was a big deal.

In a married life, I think happiness is of course important, but she thinks happiness is just as important. It's just that the two of us didn't get married because of the long-distance problem, but this doesn't affect my judgment on this matter.

I can accept the second child with the woman's surname, and I will not have any psychological pressure because of this. We live in an era of free love, where everyone can pursue the happiness they want, and everyone can decide how they live.

For a single-child family, I think it's normal to want one of the children to have their last name. As a 21st century boy, I'm not so rigid in my thinking and less macho in life, which I think is perfectly acceptable and doesn't affect my dedication to my children.

In fact, in real life, if a girl makes such a request, I think most boys nowadays will not refuse.

With the development of the economy, people's minds are becoming more and more open-minded, and the issue of the child's surname will not become a key issue affecting the relationship between two people. As long as two people love each other, I think this family can live happily ever after.

There are always things in life that need to be accepted, and I don't think we have any reason to object.

I can fully accept the second child taking the woman's surname, not only can I accept it, but I think I should do the same, after all, it is the woman's child, and the pain they suffer is only known to them.

I can accept the second child with the woman's surname, in fact, there is nothing bad, a child has a surname, it is very fair to each other, two people can be equal in marriage, in order to be happy for a long time.

It's acceptable, the child's name is just a code name, it doesn't matter whose surname you follow, anyway, it's your own child, and you will also win the respect of the other party.

I can accept the second child with the woman's surname, because the child is two people, since they are both second children, then it is okay to follow the woman.

I can accept it, after all, the child was born to a woman, she has suffered so many crimes, and it is normal for the second child to follow her surname.

This requires two people to communicate in advance, if everyone has discussed it, it doesn't matter who the second child has the surname, in fact, the second child follows the woman's surname, which is also more fair.

According to laws and regulations, a child's surname can be taken by either the father or the mother, but, in general, children take their father's surname without special reasons.

As for you to give birth to a child with the man's surname, and if you want to take the woman's surname when you have a second child, you must discuss it with your husband and in-laws in advance, and then go to register the child with the woman's surname after obtaining the consent of your in-laws.

Yes, no matter how many children you have, you can choose to have the father's surname or the mother's surname, which is the right of your husband and wife, and has nothing to do with your in-laws.

However, the in-laws do not agree, and this may exacerbate the family conflict, so it is best to convince the in-laws with your husband before choosing to do so, so as to avoid a lot of unnecessary trouble.

If you have two children, then one of them can have the woman's surname, but it must be agreed by the in-laws, which requires you to negotiate with him, and if the in-laws do not object, it is okay.

The first child with the man's surname and the second child can be born with the woman's surname. As long as you communicate well with your in-laws, I think your in-laws will understand.

According to the policy of the state, a child born can take the surname of either parent, but the surname cannot be fabricated out of thin air; According to your situation, it mainly depends on the open-mindedness of your in-laws, and if your husband agrees, you can discuss it with your in-laws.

In this case, it is necessary to discuss with the in-laws, and the family with a strong sense of family concept may not agree, and those who have a family tree may not agree, as long as the in-laws agree, it is no problem.

If you want to have a second child with the woman's surname, then you have to get the consent of the man's family, you can communicate with them well, and they have no opinion.

It's up to you to see your family situation and how well you communicate with your family! If you are an only child and have two boys! The in-laws are more reasonable! If your husband agrees, it's no problem! Even in the past, there were many people with their mother's last name!

It depends on the communication between you and your husband. If your husband agrees, it's fine. If you are an only child, you should agree.

This requires you to discuss the child's surname with your husband and her husband's family, and the law stipulates that the child's surname follows either parent, but there are more traditionally with the father in our country!

Of course, you can. As for whether you can agree or not, it depends on the man's family. There are some societies that agree, but the vast majority do not agree very much.

Can the first child born and the second child born with the man's surname apply for consent with the woman's in-laws? You can discuss this with your in-laws and they will agree.

In fact, the second child can be with the woman's surname, and at the same time, I think the child's surname has nothing to do with the father or the mother, it still depends on how the two people choose.

If you have a child with your father's surname, and your second child with your father's or mother's surname, you have to negotiate with your husband and wife, as long as they have no opinion, it doesn't matter what others say!

As long as it is discussed, there is no problem, and if the in-laws do not agree, it will not work.

In fact, the most important thing for this kind of thing is to communicate and negotiate with your husband, and the opinions of your in-laws are not the main thing, after all, the first child has already followed her husband's heart, and under normal circumstances, your husband will understand.

In fact, this is the result of discussion and research between the two sides, as long as both parties agree, and then do the ideological work of the parents, it is much easier to achieve a lot now.

Since ancient times, children have taken their father's surname. This tradition has been around for a long time. Perhaps it is because of the predominance of men in this society.

However, with the development of society, people do not particularly care about whose surname their children have. Because in real life, some children take their father's surname, and some take their mother's surname. So, in marriage, is it reasonable for the wife to want the second child to follow his surname?

1. The surname is actually just a mark, whether it is the surname of the father or the surname of the mother, it cannot change the relationship of family affection.

In ancient times, the surname of the father was only for the purpose of passing on the lineage. Nowadays, people seem to have weakened this thinking a lot. The child is the child of both husband and wife, and neither the father's surname nor the mother's surname can change the relationship.

Therefore, there is no need to dwell on this issue at all.

Second, the eldest of some families takes the father's surname, and when the second child is born, he follows the mother's surname.

Because many adults are now only children, therefore, the status of two people is equal, therefore, on the question of whose surname the child has, many young people have also chosen a more fair approach, they have agreed in advance, when the first child, with the father's surname, to the second child, with the mother's surname, in fact, this practice is very good. This can also fulfill the wishes of both parents.

3. Some families will let their children add the surnames of both parties to their names.

Nowadays, some people choose a four-character name when naming their children. The first two words are the last names of both parents, and the last two words are the real names. This method of naming is also a popular practice nowadays.

In fact, this practice is also very good, after all, it can make parents more satisfied in this issue. However, this way of naming generally occurs when the two surnames are not particularly popular, after all, you also need to pay attention to how good the name is.

In our daily life, I think love is very beautiful, because it can make us feel that life is full of color, among them, our life is boring many times, because in addition to work, we may not have anything else to do, so at this time love can add color and temperature to our life, and we are really lucky to meet the right person in our life. So now let's look at such a question, in marriage, is it reasonable for the wife to want the second child to take her surname? In a marriage, if my wife asks the second child to learn sex, I think such a request is reasonable, and one can follow the father's surname and the mother's surname.

One. A child can be born with the father's surname and the mother's surname.

In our daily life, we will find that in fact, some children follow the mother's surname, I think the surname is just a name, sometimes there is no need to be too serious, not to marry someone else's family, the child can only follow the father's surname, if there are two children, one can follow the father's surname, one can follow the mother's surname, if the second child is born, in fact, there is such a requirement, I think it is also reasonable, maybe she hopes that her child can follow her surname in the future, so that the child will always remember the mother's surname. <>

Two. Following the mother's surname didn't make much of a difference.

In fact, not all children in the family must have the father's surname, if there are more children in the family, or there are two children, in fact, one can follow the mother's surname. The arrival of a new life in this relationship means that the family is complete and can make the family full of more warmth, so many times the parents' relationship is not very good, and they will slowly run in for the sake of their children, and strive to give each other a happy family, with the mother's surname, it has no effect. <>

The above is just a personal opinion, if you encounter such a situation in your life, do you think it is reasonable?

I think it's reasonable, in fact, many places are now popular for the second child to follow the mother's surname, I think whose surname is not very important, as long as the family is harmonious and the life is happy, there is nothing that can't be.

Reasonable, no one stipulates that children can only take their father's surname, as long as both parties are willing to have a surname.

If you think it's reasonable, it's reasonable, because women also have half of the right to speak, and they are also part of the family, which is more casual and not reluctant.

Yes, because there is no such law now, so children can also take their mother's surname, which also reflects the status of women.

In marriage, of course, the wife wants the second child to follow the mother's surname? Because it is also very hard for the mother to come back and give birth. It is also a matter of course to let the child follow his mother's mind.

If my wife wants a second child and her last name, I would do it. But I still hope that the two children have the same surname.

For thousands of years, the tradition in China has been to follow the father's surname, and in most countries in the world, it is not only the children who follow their father, but also the woman who marries must change to her husband's surname. In China, at the legal level, children can take their father's surname or their mother's surname. Because at the legal level, it is okay to follow the parents' surname, if the wife wants to have a second child with her surname, after all, it is difficult for a woman to give birth to a child, and it is not easy to object, and she will be willing.

But I think it is better to follow the tradition and follow the father's surname, after all, the customs and habits have been like this for a long time, and the child does not follow the father's surname, and it is easy to be considered to eat soft rice or be suspected of being a son-in-law, which hurts the man's self-esteem. If one follows the father's surname and the other follows the mother's surname, as everyone usually says, it is easy to be mistaken by the outside world for a combined family, and there will be an embarrassing situation. In addition, one follows the father's surname and the other follows the mother's surname, and in real life, there has been a situation of family disharmony or even conflict, the elders of both sides are biased towards one person, and there are contradictions in property inheritance, resulting in tension in family relations.

The above is my opinion and opinion, everyone can express their own views on this issue.

Hello willing, as a lesbian, if I were a gay man, I would definitely agree to have a second child with the woman's surname.

Because on this issue, I once told my husband that if the second child has another child, the child will take my surname, but my husband disagreed, and I didn't dwell on this topic anymore.

Personally, I think that most parents in modern society also do their best to raise their daughters, and raise a daughter only to marry a stranger. If you compare it to something inappropriate, it's like a good cabbage is gone, and your heart is more or less very unbalanced.

Not to mention having one child, if you have two children, then taking one of the children with the woman's surname is actually a kind of reward for the father-in-law. This kind of return can be called a spiritual return, which makes the father-in-law and mother-in-law feel that the son-in-law remembers them and cares about them.

Like our family, I am very happy if the child who has a second child follows my surname, and I think my husband loves me too much. But if my husband insists on not allowing it, then I won't force it, because my mother's family also has a younger brother, so I have a nephew with the same surname as me. My parents won't be too disappointed either.

In fact, most of the post-80s and post-90s generations are only children, and only one daughter was born in the family, and finally married. I think this issue should not be raised by the woman at all, but the man should take the initiative to ensure with his father-in-law and mother-in-law that the second child will take the grandfather's surname. Chinese, in fact, still regard the passing of surnames from generation to generation as very important.

There is no need to refute this.

Of course, if the woman's parents marry their daughter and receive a huge bride price from the man, it is a different matter. Personally, I think that marrying a daughter in some places and charging a sky-high bride price is selling a daughter in disguise, so there is no need to fight for this surname.

The above is purely a personal opinion, please forgive me for the shortcomings!