Qin Shi Huang has received mixed reviews in history, how would you evaluate Qin Shi Huang?

Qin Shi Huang is a legendary epoch-making figure in Chinese history, the founding emperor of the Qin Dynasty, the first great unified dynasty in Chinese history, who has had a profound impact on Chinese and world history, pushed China into the era of great unification, laid the basic pattern of China's political system for more than 2,000 years, and was praised as "the first emperor of the ages" by the Ming Dynasty thinker Li Zhen.

Vinegar is delicious, vinegar is not delicious, sugar is delicious, sugar is not delicious, marriage is too tired, marriage is very happy, you just say such a simple thing is said to be good, some people say bad, not to mention the emperor who changed a dynasty, a Qin king, his violence, his ruthlessness, can not erase this person's ability, at the age of 39, he destroyed the Six Kingdoms, he achieved the great unification of the Chinese nation, admire.

Now people to judge other people are either good or bad, history says that Qin Shi Huang is a tyrant, I think although he is a tyrant, but because of the problems of the times, he does not use extraordinary means how to achieve the great unification of China, if he has no strategy, no talent, how can he set up a centralized system, how can he unify the unit of measurement, people, always have to look at the problem in many aspects, in order to see things clearly.

I think he is the first emperor of the ages, because he unified the six kingdoms, made the Chinese culture further exchange and integration, and also established the foundation for the later feudal dynasties, and even built the Great Wall to resist foreign invasions, although he has many negative reviews, I still think he deserves the title of the first emperor of the ages.

I think he's very methodical and has a strong strategic vision.

Books with the same text, cars with the same track, and unified weights and measures, so that people all over the country can use the same language, use unified standards to maintain roads, and promote economic development. This is a truly great feat!

Look at Europe, why there are so many languages, it is because there is no specific standard, which leads to economic development that is not as good as that of the United States and the United Kingdom!

I don't think that's true. Qin Shi Huang established the emperor system, ** implemented the system of three princes and nine kings, attacked the Xiongnu in the north, built the Great Wall, built the spiritual canal, unified currency and writing, and established the Qin Dynasty into a great unification in China's history.

Qin Shi Huang has merits and deeds, but the two cannot be compared, as the so-called gold is not perfect, we should treat it rationally. His greatest contribution was the unification of the six countries, the promulgation of laws and the unification of the written language, which in turn had a profound impact on the history of China and the world, and laid the basic pattern of China's political system for more than 2,000 years. So I don't think he can overshadow his outstanding contribution because of his mistakes.

Qin Shi Huang he unified the six countries, unified the system, culture and currency, he made a significant contribution to the history of China, and at the same time because he maintained his own political unity and centralization, made some excessive measures, and also had a great impact on China's history, so I think to evaluate Qin Shi Huang should be divided into two for evaluation, not too one-sided, his merits and demerits should be combined.

The importance of Qin Shi Huang in Chinese history is undoubted, the county system he created is still very used in today's China, Qin Shi Huang established the underlying idea of great unification for the Chinese nation, and every monarch in each period of Chinese civilization took unification as the first responsibility, making Chinese civilization one of the few big countries in the world with unification as the background.

Ying Zheng was born in Handan, the capital of Zhao State, and later returned to Qin State. In 247 BC, at the age of 13, the throne was reused by Li Si, Wang Jian and others, from 230 BC to 221 BC, successively destroyed the six kingdoms of Han, Zhao, Wei, Chu, Yan and Qi, completed the great cause of unifying China, and established a unified multi-ethnic state with centralized power - Qin Dynasty.

I think the First Emperor is really powerful. It's just that some things are done in too much of a hurry.

Unification of the Six Kingdoms to establish the first great unified country in Chinese history, the establishment of counties and counties with the same track (unified national road width, convenient for the whole country to travel to and fro) Shu Tongwen (abolish the six languages and unify the use of seal scripts), Xing Tonglun (to teach the law, and set up cunning township officials in various places, called "three elders" to unify people's cultural psychology), unified weights and measures (abolish the original way of counting instruments in the six countries, and unify the use of the statistical methods of the Qin State), build the Great Wall (resist the invasion of ethnic minorities).

The people of the whole country were forbidden to use private weapons, the law was severe, and the burning of books and Confucianism restricted the wisdom of the people to maintain the rule of the Qin state.

Overall, Qin Shi Huang was a great tyrant in Chinese history.

Qin Shi Huang's merits and demerits:

Gong: 1 Unify the six countries.

In the late Warring States period, Qin became the most powerful country among the Seven Kingdoms.

In my eyes, Qin Shi Huang is a hero who unified the six countries and ended the war, but he is also a sinner who burned a large number of history books, Qin Shi Huang made a significant contribution to the unification of the country, but also led to the loss of a large number of history books.

In my eyes, Qin Shi Huang is a man of great courage and strategy, and the correct evaluation of Qin Shi Huang should be from both sides of the positive and negative, rather than one-sided.

In my eyes, Qin Shi Huang is a king with a certain historical value, but his personality is more irritable, and the Great Wall he built unified the written language and unified the six kingdoms, and his contribution is worthy of recognition.

Qin Shi Huang in my eyes has merit and deeds, although Qin Shi Huang is tyrannical, but he unified the four seas, unified the currency, and built the Great Wall is also a good thing.

Qin Shi Huang made great contributions to the unification of the Six Kingdoms and the unification of weights and measures, but his book-burning and Confucianism hindered the development of Chinese culture, and his brutality made people's lives miserable.

I think from a historical point of view, it's a great unification. It has achieved a propulsive role in history. But on the other hand, he is also more brutal personally.

Later generations have mixed reviews of Qin Shi Huang, do you think Qin Shi Huang's merits outweigh his faults? Yes. After the unification of the Six Kingdoms, Qin Shi Huang was culturally"Harming the country and harming the people"In terms of safeguarding their own interests, they have not done much except for formulating political measures such as centralization and county systems.

It is the famous "book burning and advocating Confucianism", in fact, book burning is not Xiang Yu's entire responsibility. Why?

At that time, Qin Shi Huang ordered that all the ideological books of the Six Kingdoms should not be collected by the people (other scientific and agricultural books could be collected), so these books that collected pre-Qin thinkers were hidden in the Qin palace by Qin Shi Huang, and were finally burned to death by Xiang Yu. In the case of Confucianism, it was the two Confucian scholars around Qin Shi Huang who fled, causing the crime of shielding and killing some people, but this was limited to the Confucian scholars in the palace, so it was not a nationwide atrocity such as "burning books to trap Confucianism". If Qin Shi Huang really unified the characters, he really had great merit.

Qin Shi Huang did not unify any writing at all. The only thing that is unified is the font, just like today's imitation Song style, Song style, regular script and Xingshu. After the Qin Dynasty unified the world, it was stipulated that only official decrees could be written in small seals.

If ** orders it today, only imitation characters can be used, because it is written in Song script. Other fonts are prohibited. Excuse me, what is the credit for this?

It was the Yellow Emperor who <> unified the text. The specific executor is Cangjie. In the unified text, Qin Shi Huang's merit is zero.

The Yellow Emperor is the highest merit. I think there is no doubt that Qin Shi Huang's merits outweigh his faults. After the establishment of the Qin Empire, Qin ** and Qin Shi Huang were criticized for more than two thousand years.

Qin Shi Huang was a tyrant, and Qin was a tyrant. After a long time, it finally turned into a curse. Throughout the history of criticism of Qin ** and Qin Shi Huang for more than 2,000 years, the basic situation is that the criticism is fierce and the factual evidence is weak.

The Qin Dynasty ruled the world with an unstoppable momentum, and rebuilt the Chinese civilization on a large scale with the ambition of reform and prosperity, so that China at that time not only crossed the ancient and loose federal civilization of the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, but also integrated all the achievements of civilization bred by the fierce struggle of the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period for more than 600 years, and created the iron civilization of mankind on the largest scale and the fastest speed, which was the greatest state form and the most progressive social civilization in the Qi era. In general, there are two main points: Qin Shi Huang unified the territory of China.

Qin Shi Huang also unified Chinese civilization. The unity of civilizations is more important than the unity of the territories.