The profound meaning of the phrase fish always live their whole life in the sea .

The fish can't change its destiny and can't see the world overseas, which is his sadness and its luck. Because whoever leaves him will die. One should work hard to achieve a higher level, but if you don't have the strength and no faith, maybe it's good to be a frog at the bottom of a well, at least you're worried about your life all the time on land than on land.

Some things can be changed, so do your best to change them; There are some things that can't be changed, so don't force it, remember to live happily and have no regrets at the end of your life.

This is an objective fact of ecological balance.

The importance of the environment.

No living thing can be detached.

Fish always live their lives in the sea", just like people have to live in this society, there are strong winds and waves, there are thorns, there are reefs, and they must learn to live and strive to get rid of all difficulties in order to live a peaceful life.

It's sad......Because of the constraints of objective conditions and the limitations of ability, he can only be a frog at the bottom of a well forever, and cannot see the farther world (such as the scenery on land). It's self-deprecating for your own powerlessness.

The life of a fish. It is inseparable from water.

It's like people. You can't get rid of something that can't be arranged.

Even if it leaves the water.

I won't be able to live long.

Indeed, the growth of fish is still similar to that of us, and sometimes, people will be restricted by a certain environment to grow, so we must be required to adapt to the environment, and when the opportunity is ripe, then make plans, although the fish do not have a chance to get out of the water, but not yet"Flying Fish"The existence of the fish, at least it shows that the fish is also struggling with fate, unwilling to live this life, shouldn't we work harder, you say, landlord!

The fish lives in the sea because it does not have a high pursuit, and if the ancestor of the fish had ambitions and goals, it would not have lived in the water for generations, right? (Pure self-testimonial, I hope that those who have points will have a field, and those who have no points will have a personal field!) Thank you all for pulling

I think it is: people should not be too ambitious, if you are a fish, you can't live without water, and you can't live without water.

Because the gills of a fish are only adapted to absorb oxygen from the water and cannot absorb oxygen from the air, it can only live in the water.

Because fish breathe with gills, and at the same time, the gills can only absorb oxygen dissolved in water, not in the air.