What s going on with the Sakura Telescope?

Don't listen to the nonsense upstairs, known as Japanese cherry blossoms, in fact, they are not made in Japan, a company in Hong Kong, because the registered trademark is Japanese cherry blossoms, so it misleads many people, the owner of selling dog meat with a sheep's head, he is not professional in making telescopes, toy level.

Sakura is a brand, and it is the Sakura brand telescope. I have one, it's very good, good value for money.

The most basic thing about a telescope is sharpness, and the sharpness of a telescope with obvious chromatic aberration is not good, and chromatic aberration is a problem of sharpness. Regardless of whether others say toy telescope or standard telescope, good sharpness is a good mirror, unlike some standard telescopes The sharpness is not as good as a toy telescope, the telescope is playing, anyone who says that a certain telescope is a toy telescope is a misguided mirror that others say between 400 yuan and 10,000 yuan? It's not good to buy, I bought a mirror of Yuanjin brand 15 50 400 yuan, the effect is poor and the color difference is obvious, not as good as a 50 yuan mirror, buy a telescope without buying a brand mirror, the brand is worth dozens of yuan, I personally look at things and feel that the sharpness of pulling close is a good mirror, how can a good mirror be so expensive, unless the factory uses more workers, fewer customers, low sales, and more advertising costs, the mirror ** soars very high, because there are no customers, everyone needs money, Finally, a few customers who can be counted can only soar in order to make money, which is too pitiful.

I'm a customer I'm just figuring out now, anyone who says that so-and-so telescope is a toy, it's not good sales, no one feeds them, they popularize telescope knowledge is right, but it's not right to sell expensive when you help here, it can only make customers feel that the telescope is a luxury product, not a lot of supplies rather than high-end licensed durable goods, and the price of several customers soars, which is not right, indicating that everyone doesn't like this telescope and wants to make money, so they can only sell and raise the price, and the storage strength ≠ sales. Whoever sells telescopes writes information about the strength of storage is selling the mirror at an expensive price. The customer's picture review is the strength, and the telescope is a visual toy, so when buying a telescope, you must look at the picture review, or communicate with the seller to ask for the picture behind the mirror.

Finally, it is judged according to the physical principle of the lens. Also understand the degree film. Calibre.

Achromatic. Flat.

The so-called "Japan Sakura Telescope" is not actually from Japan, and in fact there is no such brand at all. So, what are the so-called "Sakura Military Night Vision Telescopes" and "Japanese Sakura Telescopes" that exist in large quantities on the market now? Sakura, which did exist, was originally a low-end brand in Hong Kong in the last century, but as early as about 10 years ago, it collapsed.

I don't know why, maybe this brand left some impressions, maybe "Sakura" is easily reminiscent of "Japan", and then most of the inferior products in the mainland began to be sold under the brand of "Japanese Sakura". Sakura, from a brand that has been thrown down, has become synonymous with inferior products.

The landlord judged that the telescope could not only look at the brand, and if the landlord was satisfied with the magnification field of view of the telescope, there was no need to retreat. The **200 yuan should be a suitable for a sleepy boy** (unless it is a false price for an unscrupulous trader to deceive people who don't know how to get a shoddy product). A good telescope imaging is clear, Wang Mao Wang himself has a certain quality, the hand is particularly comfortable, the field of view is different due to different magnifications, as long as the landlord feels comfortable.

Yes, it is still a very trustworthy brand.

There is no such brand.