What is the responsibility for me if he ran away with the criminals?

Criminals go together, if you are a policeman, and the criminals run away, then you are derelict in your duties, and if you are an ordinary person and the criminals run away, you will not be legally responsible.

What is the responsibility for me if he ran away with the criminals? Walking with the criminal, he ran away, and you helped him escape, and you are responsible, and if you can't stop it and are run away by it, you are not responsible.

If you don't know, you don't have responsibility, if you know that you are a wanted criminal, it is a crime of harboring, and if you don't report the crime, please think clearly

If you didn't commit a crime, that's cover-up, and if you know he's sinned, go with him and don't report him, that's the case.

Walking with the three-year-old Songzi, he ran. What are my responsibilities? Actually, he didn't have much responsibility for you when he ran away, but you walked with them. Then it depends on what people say, you are also in business, and you didn't give it this month. Look at me.

If you commit a crime with him, then you are in the same case, and if you do not commit a crime with him, you also know about it and should bear some responsibility.

Walking with criminals, if you are knowing, it is a crime of concealment, and you will be punished by law.

If you don't know he's a criminal and he runs away, you don't need to be held responsible, and if you are complicit with a criminal, then you're guilty of harboring.

I don't know what you're like, what kind of relationship is you? If you don't do your duty, I don't think you're responsible.

With the criminal, but did not shield him, it has nothing to do with you if he ran away, if you do, it may be a crime of harboring or harboring.

Walk with a criminal, he ran away, and if you don't know that he is a criminal, there is no responsibility for you.

Go with the criminal, he ran away, you don't have to take any responsibility.

The criminals go together, but if you don't do anything illegal, he runs away, and he has no responsibility for you.

Walking with a criminal, I feel like he ran away, you have no responsibility, you don't know at all that he is a criminal0

Walk with the criminals, well, what is the responsibility for me, I think there is direct responsibility for you.

Walking with the criminal, what responsibility does he have for me when he runs away, it depends on whether you know or don't know, and there is no responsibility if you don't know.

The difference between breaking the law and committing a crime is actually quite large, and the circumstances of the violation are generally relatively minor, but the punishment for the crime is the most severe, so the two are different, so what are the specific differences? Let's see what the lawyer has to say!

Breaking the law and committing a crime are two different concepts, and they are both related and distinct.

Violation of law refers to all acts that violate the constitution, laws, decrees, administrative regulations and administrative rules of the country, and its extension is extremely extensive. Crimes, on the other hand, must comply with the provisions of the Criminal Law of our country on crimes, and must have the following characteristics:

First, crime is an act that endangers society. The harmfulness of behavior to society is the most essential characteristic of crime.

Second, a crime is an act that violates the criminal law. In other words, an act that endangers society must also be an act under the Criminal Code in order to constitute a crime.

Thirdly, a crime must be an act punishable by criminal punishment, and only an act that endangers society is considered a crime if it is punishable by criminal punishment. The above-mentioned characteristics are indispensable conditions that must be present in the determination of any kind of crime.

At the same time, the Criminal Law also stipulates that if the circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, it shall not be considered a crime. This shows that the circumstances of the act and the degree of harm to society are the boundaries that distinguish between violations of the law and crimes.

Breaking the law and committing a crime are two concepts in law, and violating the laws and regulations of the country is not necessarily a criminal act. However, a violation of the Penal Code is a suspected crime. Whether it is a crime or not can only be determined after the court has made a judgment.

Whether it is a crime or not is judged according to the consequences caused! As long as the other party is intentionally injured or the above injuries, it constitutes the crime of intentional injury, otherwise it is a violation of the Public Security Administration Law and will be punished by public security, but it does not constitute a crime.

Answer: The fact of violating the law should indicate that a crime has been committed.

No, breaking the law is not necessarily a crime, it depends on the situation, such as speeding, illegal behavior, but not a criminal act.

A should be chosen. Our criminal law regulates what a crime is and how it is punished.

According to the provisions of China's criminal law, if the person's previous fraud has not passed the statute of limitations, his previous fraud will be investigated. At this time, his first sentence had already passed, so the fraud was sentenced and executed separately. If he behaves very well in the first sentence, he will be given due consideration for a lenient sentence in the second sentence.

Sentencing is to be based on the principle of first-in-the-first commutation.

I will catch it, but don't catch it very tightly, I guarantee that it will be fine after a while, and the police station will ask for some money.

It's hard to say, since the first 2 can come out for a little money, then the third one will be fine for a little money.

Of course, catch. If you are seriously injured, you should be sentenced.

Definitely going to catch it. The law will not let him go; For the sake of money, the police will not let him go.

Yes, his responsibilities remain.

For all laws, please refer to the Constitution of the People's Republic of China

It depends on the situation, and the specific points are as follows:

If, before a person commits a crime, an analysis of what kind of legal consequences the crime will bear, with the aim of making him abandon the crime, the act is not enough to constitute a crime;

If a person is taught the method of committing a crime before committing the crime, such as teaching a person how to commit a crime, the act will constitute the crime of teaching the method of committing the crime under the criminal law, and the corresponding legal responsibility will be borne.

From the title and content you wrote, I will give you the following analysis:

If you analyze the legal consequences of committing a crime before someone commits a crime, with the aim of making him give up the crime, then your behavior is not enough to constitute a crime;

If you teach others how to commit crimes, such as how to commit theft, before they commit crimes, your actions will constitute the crime of teaching criminal methods under the criminal law, and you will bear corresponding legal responsibility.

As long as they do not participate in the actual course of the crime, such as after committing the crime, they help the criminal suspect to avoid legal arrest and sanctions, they do not commit a crime, and of course instigating others to commit a crime is different. In a sense, your actions can only mean that you are not a qualified legal practitioner.