Is there a difference between good and bad Compare good and bad

What's good and what's bad. Things don't seem to have good or bad properties in themselves. But for the same thing, the same person, or the same person at different times will have different conclusions about its good and bad, if two people are not compatible, the conclusions about the good and bad attributes of this thing are likely to be diametrically opposed, which is very common.

So a thing does not have fixed "good" and "bad" attributes even at the same moment. A thing is only the creation of a qualitative change in the original system that produced it. The thing itself, the good and the bad, the human being, the human behavior, are only the fruit of the more primitive system that produces it and the appearance of its creation.

There are many, many systems around us, they are natural and must be generated, the same must as ours, for human beings some are tangible, some are intangible, and we are destined to prosper, decline and die along with these systems. I haven't read much of the idol's book for three days of fishing, two screens, I don't know if that's the truth. There is no absolute good or bad, black or white, in this world.

There are good and bad, everything has two sides, but there is a difference between good and bad.

Good and bad are relative, and a person uses his own principles to judge the good and bad of things.

Good or bad depends on personal thoughts, and although there is no absolute good or bad in this world, there are still positions, and there are still good and bad.

It's really hard to define who is good and who is bad. Because people are complex animals. Thoughts are complex, and so are actions.

It mainly depends on how you measure your own psychology. Believe in yourself. Trust your feelings.

If you think it's good, that's good. If you feel bad, no matter how good others say, it's not really good. One word.

Still have to believe in yourself.

The word "comparison" is very abstract in the eyes of many people, but in my mind, it is true. Comparisons can be good or bad. There are two sides to everything:

The comparison of goodwill can make people have a spirit of struggle and sprint, on the contrary, it will make people lazy, and they cannot surpass themselves and challenge themselves; But if it's used in the wrong place, it can have a bad effect – malicious comparisons. This refers to intrigue in the dark, fighting openly and secretly. Like in the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Dongfang Shuo and Qiankunzi and Wang Huaiye fought and "fought" in the imperial court.

Personally, I think that these people like Qiankun Staring Kongzi and Wang Huaiye are scum! Maybe I watched too much of the TV series "Dongfang Shuo"; Maybe those actors acted too realistically, and those traitors often made me gnash my teeth!

Back to the topic – comparison. We're rambling on this big topic. Let's talk about how we can develop a legitimate way to compare ourselves with others.

First of all, we must see the strengths of others, which is more valuable. If your English is very good, you often score more than 90 points, but if you compare it with someone who scores more than 60 points in the English test, is it valuable?

Ask yourself and answer yourself - the former bridge is worthless! So what's the point of having no value?

I believe that many people have watched "The Legend of Sou Shen", and I think it is very good-looking. Tianzun and Yu Hengzi intrigued, and in the end Tianzun was defeated by Yu Hengzi, but Yu Hengzi gave her courage to Tianzun and was able to die, and she and Yu Hengzi finally turned into a snake and never separated! Perhaps, the comparison can also be more emotional!

All in all, the comparison is okay, but there is one premise - a good comparison!

Good and bad and good and bad are different angles of evaluating things, which can be understood as two different dimensions. The difference between them is as follows:

1.Good or bad is a relative concept, which refers to the degree to which something is superior or inferior to other things, and it is relative.

2.Superiority and disadvantage is an absolute concept that refers to the advantages and disadvantages that something has in itself and is not affected by other things.

Take an example to illustrate: the quality of a car refers to the degree to which the car is good compared to other cars, for example, it can be said that the car is good because it performs better than other similar cars; It can also be said that this car is poor because it is of lower quality than other similar cars. The advantages and disadvantages of this car refer to the advantages and disadvantages of the car itself, for example, it can be said that the advantages of this car are strong power and firm body structure, and the disadvantage is that fuel consumption is higher and more expensive.

In conclusion, good and bad are a relative concept that needs to be compared with other things; Superiority and disadvantage, on the other hand, is a relatively independent concept, which only examines the characteristics and problems of the object's innate and empty answers.

There is a difference between good and bad and good and bad. Good or bad refers to the quality of behavior, quality or disorderly goods, which can be evaluated through superficial inspection, and the evaluation criteria are mainly in line with social ethics and legal provisions. The advantages and disadvantages refer to the advantages and disadvantages of a certain thing, which can be evaluated through in-depth research and analysis, and the evaluation criteria are mainly based on the completeness, effectiveness, flexibility and technical integrity of its function.

Definition of good and bad

Hello, the essential difference between good and bad, good and bad are relative, good and bad can be transformed into each other. Good people can become bad people, good things can become bad things, and vice versa. The criteria for judging are different, and the distinction between good and bad is different.

In social life, there are morals and laws, and what we think is good advocated by moral laws and what we think is bad, and what violates moral laws is considered bad. Human beings are historical and realistic. Two meanings:

First, the essence of human self is gradually generated in the constantly developing history and real life, and people always live in the concrete historical and real space. Second, the formation and development of man's self-essence must be constrained by certain historical and practical conditions. People are diverse and different.

On the other hand, individual life is unique, irreplaceable and differentiated.