Summary of the rules of high school Chinese language diseases, high school Chinese language disease

Recently, a Chinese professor at Yale University, Meier Tsai, wrote a parenting book called "Tiger Mom's Battle Song" about her experience of disciplining her two daughters in a "Chinese-style" way, which sparked a big discussion in the United States about "China-American education methods".

This is a parallel compound sentence with two clauses:

The first clause: A parenting book by Cai Meier, a Chinese-American professor at Yale University, called "Tiger Mother's Battle Song", describes her experience of disciplining her two daughters in a "Chinese-style" way.

Adverbial: Recent (precedent adverbial).

Pre-subject: A parenting book by Cai Meier, a Chinese-American professor at Yale University in the United States, called "Tiger Mother Battle Song".

Subject: Book. Predicate: Introduction.

Complement: 了 (tense particle as complement).

Pre-object: How she disciplined her two daughters in a "Chinese" way.

Object: Experience.

The second sub-clause: Provoke a big discussion in the United States about "Sino-American education methods".

Subject: book (omitted from the previous period).

Predicate: to cause.

Statement: The United States on the "Sino-American Educational Method".

Object: Great discussion.

There is nothing wrong with this compound sentence.

Sentence: The book introduces the experience and provokes a great discussion.

Experience in how to manage in the Chinese style.

There's nothing wrong with that.

It feels weird to read, so add "this" before "causing a big discussion in the United States about the "Sino-American education method".

It's not the experience that causes the big discussion, it's the fact that the thing causes the big discussion...

1. The decision of the city on strictly prohibiting raising dogs and killing wild dogs and rabies in urban areas has been warmly supported and supported by the general public. (Jiangxi volume).

Analysis]: The mistake here is actually obvious, that is, [the city ** strictly prohibits the behavior of raising dogs in the urban area], and due to the inappropriate expression, that is, the word "and" makes the meaning of the sentence become [the city ** also strictly prohibits the killing of wild dogs". This is the so-called joint structure (the two parts before and after the word "and" constitute this joint structure) is inappropriate.

2. Wang Lin stayed in the laboratory for half a month, as if he was isolated from the world, so he went home and forced himself to read the newspaper for ten days. (Cantonese volume).

Analysis]: [Ten days of newspapers] is an ambiguous expression - (1) Xiao Wang has read newspapers for 10 days, for example, newspapers from August 1 to August 10, which is called "10 days of newspapers"; (2) Xiao Wang was alone at home and spent 10 days reading a lot of newspapers. So, after changing to [Ten Days Newspaper], this ambiguity was removed.

Let's explain 2 first

There are two interpretations of the ten-day newspaper.

1. Suppose the newspaper is **, from No. 1 to No. 10, a total of 10 days, 10 newspapers, and Wang reads these newspapers.

2. Suppose there is only one newspaper, but it is very thick, and he reads it for 10 days.

There is no language problem in the election.

a."It shows ......"Wonderful story" is a mismatch between the verb and the object.

c.After "comparable", add "ability", otherwise the object is missing.

d.The first half of the sentence should be changed to read "the experience of traditional culture and art". The second half of the sentence is wordy and incomprehensible, and there are many problems.

Answer: a.

Analytical sentences: bThe word "and" is a top priority" must be removed.

c .The last two sentences are reversed, and the words "passed." Put it in "to one bit." Front.

d .At the end of the narrative the meaning deteriorates, putting "will be usable to have." Changed to "will be usable to turn on." That is, change "have" to "open".