Can the chat history on Want Want be used as legal evidence 10

Even if you can make evidence, the probative power is not very strong, you can get in touch with the company, and the probative power of the data on the company's server is still very strong.

The kind of chat software that looks like it won't work, at least not convincingly.

Of course, you can, because Want Want this software is specially designed by the company, which is to allow buyers to keep chat records with sellers as credentials. I've also encountered the same problem, you only need to send a screenshot of the record to the certificate column of the complaint seller, and the company will deal with it, but before that, you'd better call the company and communicate.

The chat history on Want Want can be included as legal evidence!

But 1. The chat record you provide must have the name of the shipment and the quantity of the shipment indicated by the other party (if it was changed when the shipment was made, but he didn't notify you of anything in writing, so he ignored it).

2. The other party needs to issue an invoice (express delivery), if the quantity and name of the goods are also specified above, then this responsibility can only be borne by yourself, because you have signed on the express delivery note; If it only clarifies the name of the goods but not the quantity, then you can take your loan bill (express delivery) as the standard, and he can only eat Huanglian dumbly.

3. You have to issue an invoice (express delivery) when you return the goods, which should clarify the quantity and name of the goods, if it is not clear, then you have nothing to say.

The web version of "Want Want cannot save chat records, for your benefit, please use the "software version" Ali Want Want.

Yes, but the original chat history must be original, that is, unedited, deleted, or modified.

Hello! The questions addressed to you are as follows:

It can be used as evidence on the one hand, but it must be supported by other evidence.

Fix the evidence first.

If you still have questions, you can contact me again and good luck!

**Want Want chat records can be used as evidence. But it's more difficult. For example, if you first prove that this **Want Want is used by you, and the other party's Want Want number is also used by the other party, this requires that the numbers of both parties have real-name authentication.

Generally, the court or public security will intervene in the investigation only upon application if the case has already been filed. Secondly, the probative power of this chat record is also relatively weak and cannot be used as direct evidence.

Evidence is divided into civil evidence and criminal evidence, so the types of evidence are as follows:

1. Evidence in civil cases includes: parties' statements, documentary evidence, physical evidence, audio-visual materials, electronic data, witness testimony, appraisal opinions, and inquest records;

2. Evidence in criminal cases includes: physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, confessions and justifications of criminal suspects and defendants, appraisal opinions, inquests, inspections, identifications, investigative experiments, and other records, audio-visual materials, and electronic data.

[Legal basis].

Article 63 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China Evidence includes:

1) Statements of the parties;

2) documentary evidence; 3) physical evidence;

4) audio-visual materials;

e) electronic data;

6) witness testimony;

7) Appraisal opinions;

8) Inquest records.

Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as a basis for determining facts. Article 62: Parties have the responsibility to provide evidence for their own claims.

The people's court shall investigate and collect evidence that the parties and their litigants are unable to collect on their own for objective reasons, or evidence that the people's court finds necessary for the trial of the case.

The people's courts shall follow legally-prescribed procedures to comprehensively and objectively review and verify evidence. Article 65: Persons shall promptly provide evidence for their own claims.

On the basis of the parties' claims and the circumstances of the trial, the people's courts are to determine the evidence that the parties shall provide and the time limit thereof. Where the parties have real difficulties in providing evidence within that time limit, they may apply to the people's court for an extension of the time limit, and the people's court will appropriately extend it on the basis of the party's application. Where parties fail to provide evidence within the time limit, the people's court shall order them to explain the reasons; Where they refuse to explain the reasons or the reasons are not sustained, the people's courts may, on the basis of different circumstances, reject the evidence, or give the evidence but give a reprimand or a fine.

Hello dear, I'm glad to answer your <>

As a transaction certificate, it usually needs to contain important information of the transaction, such as the information of the buyer and the seller, the date of the transaction, the commodity information, the quantity, etc., and the accuracy of this information needs to be guaranteed and proven. It is difficult to guarantee the accuracy of WeChat chat records. 2.

However, in some small or informal transactions, if the buyer and seller agree to use WeChat chat records as proof of the transaction and treat them as valid, the chat records can also play a certain role in proving these specific transactions. However, its effectiveness is not as good as that of official invoices and other documents, and the larger the transaction amount, the more important it is, and the more formal transaction documents are needed. 3.

In the event of a transaction dispute, WeChat chat records can also be used as a preliminary evidence to play an auxiliary role. However, in view of the fact that its accuracy is difficult to guarantee, it may be difficult to become the basis for the final ruling, and can only be used as reference evidence. Ideally, the two parties can settle the matter amicably, or a third party will notarize and intervene.

4.It is recommended that when trans-chain transactions online, formal transaction credentials are indispensable. WeChat chat records can be used as evidence for preliminary negotiations, but in transactions involving large amounts, more important transactions, or larger disputes between the two parties, it is still necessary to retain more authoritative transaction documents such as invoices and receipts.

This can maximize the protection of the rights and interests of both parties to the transaction. WeChat chat records can play a limited role in the proof of small informal transactions, and can also be used as a preliminary evidence reference. However, for more important or disputed transactions, formal transaction evidence is essential.

Want Want chat logs can be used as evidence. Because Want Want itself is a tool launched to chat between users and businesses, its content can be used as evidence. However, it is more difficult to obtain evidence.

For example, if you want to prove that this **Want Want is used by you, and the other party's Want Want number is also used by the other party, this requires that the numbers of both parties have real-name authentication. Generally, the court or public security will intervene in the investigation only upon application if the case has already been filed.

Can Want Want chat records be used as evidence?

Want Want chat logs can be used as evidence. Because Want Want itself is a tool launched to chat between users and businesses, its content can be used as evidence.

However, it is more difficult to obtain evidence.

For example, you must first prove that this **Want Want is used by you, and the other party's Want Want number is also used by the other party, which requires that the numbers of both parties have real-name authentication. Generally, the court or public security will intervene in the investigation only upon application if the case has already been filed.

Secondly, the probative power of this kind of chat record is also relatively weak, and it cannot be used as direct evidence.

The "three natures" of evidence are needed when the chat history is used as evidence:

1) Relevance. Relevance is the primary task of evidence review, and procedures that are not related to the facts to be proved in the case can be directly excluded without further examination of their legality and authenticity.

2) Legitimacy. Legitimacy is related to whether a certain piece of evidence can be qualified to be convicted, that is, whether the evidence has the ability to prove or not.

It includes the legality of the subject of the obtained evidence, the formation of the evidence in accordance with the statutory process, the form of the evidence in accordance with the statutory requirements, the content of the evidence obtained in accordance with the statutory requirements, and the use of evidence in accordance with the legal limits.

3) Authenticity. Authentic evidence can restore the facts of the case to objective facts to the greatest extent.

The authenticity of evidence is the essential requirement for evidence to be the basis for a verdict, and it requires that evidence be true in both content and form, that its content reflect objective facts, and that its form can be recognized by people.

Therefore, the examination of the authenticity of a single piece of evidence is the basis for the comprehensive determination of the evidence of difficulty.

Since the truth of evidence is the truth that people derive from after the fact, it may be a definite gap with the objective truth, so the evidence must be strictly examined to screen its authenticity.