Who knows which is faster, the Besturn D915 or the CORE2 6600? What s the difference?

Because PD's NetBurst architecture has a long pipeline, the frequency is high, but the efficiency is very low, so it has high frequency and low energy, and C2D's Core architecture combines the essence of NetBurst and PM mobile processors, and it can also reach a higher frequency while having high efficiency (relative to AMD's K8), so the 6600 can completely destroy AMD's K8 in terms of performance, not to mention a 915 that can't even do 3600+.

First of all, the heat generation of PD is large, and the power consumption is also large, which is recognized by everyone.

Then the landlord, you will have to spend more money to teach the electricity bill, and you have to buy a better radiator.

Unlike the Core 2 6600, Intel's latest product consumes 40 percent less power and is 40 percent more efficient

Which do you say?

core2 6600 must be much faster The difference between the two should be the difference between P3 and P4 generation!

The latter is much stronger than the former, as Intel said that the power consumption is reduced by 40% and the performance is increased by 40%.

If you say that the speed is of course 6600 faster, but it is ** higher, weigh it yourself, if you pursue speed, choose 6600, if you pursue cost performance, or choose AMD!

The back is much faster, the cores are different, and PD915 is very power-hungry.

Nothing is too high than **6600 and the performance is super.

The difference between calorific value T4 and T6 is not very large. They are all T series, and the TDP of the design is 35W. When there is nothing wrong with the notebook, the temperature will definitely not be too high.

I haven't actually used it, but I've used a P7350 with a TDP of 25W. My laptop is a Lenovo Y430G-PSE with integrated graphics, and the general temperature is stable around 46 degrees. My classmates' machines are all T6400 plus NV9300 discrete graphics cards of the Y430A series, but I don't know much about their machines, just know that they don't say it's very hot.

On the first floor, it is said that "boiled eggs" is a mainstream processor, which can almost have the temperature of boiled eggs. My old Lenovo brand machine, the P4 processor, is also overclocked when the CPU is 32 degrees, and the heatsink falls off and immediately falls 90 degrees. If the T4300 can really boil eggs, which notebook factory would dare to use it?

I didn't do much research on discrete graphics cards because I never used integrated graphics cards. In short, I think the temperature of the laptop graphics card is possible in the 60s, and the part that once said that there is a problem of excessive heating of the graphics cardY450 remembers to rise to 80. I feel that as long as there are no rumors of "excessive heating", the temperature can generally be in the same range.

In addition, the heat and power consumption of the machine of the discrete graphics card will definitely not be very small (compared to the integrated graphics card), and it is recommended to add auxiliary cooling equipment when running to ensure the life of the notebook.

The performance is not very clear, it is certain that the 6600 is the mainstream configuration T4300 It is safe to say that the heat can completely boil eggs. 4570This graphics card is still good in the mid-range book,3D Mark 06 can be on 3000 points,Recommend this configuration of the book。

I quoted this friend once, and I think it's very good, and I recommend it to you.

In fact, there is not much difference between performance and heat, and I only have one suggestion, which is to choose the cheaper one.

As for this book, I don't know how to evaluate.

First, they are all 64 bits.

Second, it must be E2140 fast, the core architecture is beyond doubt, E2140 is slightly better than 915, and E2140 power consumption is only 60W, and 915 power consumption is about 110W. In addition, the E2140's overclocking capabilities are much better than those of the 915.

The E2140 is better.

The D915 consumes high power and generates a lot of heat.

1 I don't have to say that it must be the Core E2140 is good, and the single-weight score software evaluation is almost the same, and the calories alone are far behind! PD with you unbearable death!

2 PD is about to be discontinued, and the heavy consideration is E2140 good!

Which of these two CPUs is better?

According to your requirements, it is decided, usually surf the Internet, watch more movies, choose 2140, less heat, high efficiency (open dual-core, definitely faster), 915, play games well, fast speed, high performance, should be matched with a more high-end graphics card, preferably more than 6600gs in order to play his best performance, his heat pay attention to a little, is quite large!

In other words, the performance of the 915 is a little higher, after all, the L2 cache is 2MB2, but the energy consumption is also quite large.

Finally, I wish you a speedy solution to the problem :-)

The biggest difference between the two is that the PD915 is a Netburst microarchitecture, while the PE2140 uses a Core microarchitecture, which makes the latter perform well at lower clock speeds and lower power consumption.

Personally, I feel that PE2140 is better than PD915

The clock speed doesn't say it all, these two CPUs are completely different architectures, and the latter is much more efficient than the former, as if more work can be done in the same amount of time, so the clock speed can be lower.

In addition, Intel developed the two architectures with different starting points: Netburst is for higher clock speeds, while Core is for higher performance, and the power-per-watt ratio.

The clock speed is not the only parameter for CPU performance.

For example, there are now 2 motors. A motor has fast speed, but high power consumption, high noise, and complex operation. The speed of the bmotor is slightly slower, but the power consumption is low and it is easy to operate. Which one do you choose?

The internal architecture of the PD processor lags behind the PE. Although the main frequency is high, the chip stability and data transmission structure are strong.

So it's better to choose PE.

One is the Pentium architecture and the other is the Core architecture The biggest difference is that the E2140 is good.

Model Core 2 Duo E4300

Applicable Type: Desktop.

Interface type LGA 775

Core type conroe

Production process. Core voltage.

Main frequency: External frequency: 200MHz

Frequency multiplication: 9x, L1 L1, 2*32k

L2 L2 2048k

FSB 800MHz

Model Pentium D 915

Applicable Type: Desktop.

Interface type LGA 775

Core type presler

Production process. Core voltage.

Main frequency: External frequency: 200MHz

Multiplier 14x

L1 L1 32k

L2 L2 2*2048k

FSB 800MHz

HyperTransport Bus Technology Hypertransport bus technology is not supported.

I guess it's E6300

The work order task PD915 is faster, and the game is faster

If the work is multi-tasking, the former is much higher.

The CPUs of the Pentium D are all dual-core CPUs.

The CPU frequency of the Pentium D915 is only faster than that of the Pentium 4, for three reasons:

1.Pentium D's CPU is using a new architecture;

2.The Pentium D's CPU is dual-core and hyper-threaded, which is much faster in terms of multitasking;

3.Pentium D's CPU is in terms of processing tasks, if the software can support the use of 2 cores at the same time, it is the processing speed x2, and the single core is, 2 cores are processed at the same time, plus the loss is faster.

May I ask if the CPU of the Pentium D is a dual-core CPU

It is the CPU frequency of the Pentium D915 only.

The main frequency here is talking about the single-core main frequency.

The galloping CPU is fast.

Since it is a single-core Pentium D, it must be fast.

The Pentium D series are all dual-core. The D915 is faster because it has a more advanced architecture.

There are many, many differences in various aspects such as architecture, core, and level, if 915 gets 100 points according to the percentage, 6600 is more than 200 points, the gap is too big, 915 is worse than 925, 925 can't run 3600+, e6300 is almost 4600+ level, in this way, e6600 should have an understanding of what level it is! In terms of vista's basic score, I estimate that 6600 can exceed the score!

Much faster, a lot faster, the Core Architecture, the Bensi Architecture, can't be compared.

The comparison of the two should be seen (how much um process, how much is the core, how much is the cache), and how much is the supporting chipset!

It's not super, it's still pd915 block.

If you play a game that is not very demanding, it's nothing, mine is an old p4, it's okay to play Vista Ultimate, as long as the memory is enough.

It's so much faster that it can't be compared at all.

The Core 2 Duoe6320 is a true dual-core. Products of the new belt.

Besturn D915 is a mid-to-high-end product in the Besturn series.

None of the 6320 is inferior to the PD915.

In addition, the PD915 is low-to-mid-range. Mid-to-high-end PD how PD945

The total frequency of the Core Duo E6320 is 1066Hz

The total frequency of the Pentium D915 is 800Hz

Of course, it's the fast of the core.

Well, of course, if strictly speaking, it's a super-generation product.

The Pentium should be faster, whether the computer is fast or not, it depends on the main frequency of the CPU, and the Pentium is obviously higher.

I'll tell you that the Core dual-core is better at the moment, although I use AMD.

But to be honest, the Core cooling problem is also solved, and the cache is super high.

The machine will not be slow for a long time, and the main frequency is only one aspect.

The UL2 of K2 is 2MB and your PD is 1MB Which do you say is better?

It's not a grade at all, take BMW or Altobi, which do you say is better?