Which is better Besturn D915 or Celeron 420 and why?

Tell you that in fact, the Pentium E2140 is not as good as the Ben D915 It's just that the Ben D915 has a big heat, in fact, the Pentium D performance is good, but it will often crash and have problems! It must be pd915 good, level 2 cache is 8 times that of 420!

The PD915 will perform much better, but consider heat generation and** as well as overclocking.

I would still choose the Saiyang 420, after all, you need a high-power power supply to buy PD915, and a lot of electricity will be wasted in a year.

The performance 915 is better than the CM430.

The heat dissipation CM420 is better than the PD915.

The power consumption of the PD915 is more than three times that of the CM420.

Of course, it's Ben D915, it's good, and the L2 cache is high.

D915 is better than 420. 420 cache is small. The 915 has a large cache and is correspondingly faster.

Pure performance 915 is good because other parameters are too different, but the comprehensive power and calorific value are still 420 good architecture gap.

Pentium D915

Frequency (MH: 2800MHz.)

Bus frequency: 800MHz

Slot type: LGA 775

L2 cache (:2MB*2.)

Craft: 65 nm.

Celeron 420 clock speed (MH: 1600MHz

Bus frequency: 800MHz

Slot type: LGA 775

L2 cache (: 512KB.)

Craft: 65 nm.

Pentium D915 is good.

No matter how handsome a eunuch is, after all, he is a eunuch, and no man is good ......

Of course, it's Pentium D915, these two CPUs are not at the same level, PD915 is dual-core, and the L2 cache is 4M, while the Celeron 420 is single-core, and the L2 cache is only 512KB, and the two are not comparable.

The former is dual-core, although it is the weakest PD series dual-core, but it is also stronger than the single-core of 420.

But if you don't make a big noise, it's just a single task, Celeron 420 is not weaker than PD 915, 420 is also a core architecture no matter how you say it, although it is a super shrink version, but the heat and power consumption are much smaller, PD 915 was a small electric stove back then!

It has to be Pentium D good, Celeron is low-end, one level lower than Pentium.

Of course, the Pentium D915 is better after all, the Celeron 420 secondary processor is slightly lower.

Pentium D915 is a super antique from the current point of view, out of the block for 4 years, the performance is really not strong according to the current standards, and the power consumption... and its cup, Celeron E3400 is Intel's main low-end processor, cost-effective, low power consumption, it is recommended that you buy Celeron E3400

Although the Pentium D has a high frequency of dual-core, it cannot share the L2 cache and needs the motherboard northbridge to communicate, and the actual efficiency is very low, and it was once called a fake dual-core by AMD.

Celeron E is a Core 2 core, although the main frequency, L2 cache are not as good as Pentium D915, but the actual performance is much higher.

The performance of the E3400 is stronger, and the performance of the PD9XX series is barely comparable to the E21XX at the lowest end of the Core2 architecture. Although the PD915 has a high frequency, the efficiency is very bad.

。。Celeron performance level is lower than Pentium processors, of course, the E2160 Champion 420.

The Celeron 420 is a single-core CPU

The 64-bit CPU with high clock speed, the E2160 architecture of the old Pentium 4 is a 64-bit dual-core CPU with a local frequency, and the E2160 of the Curry architecture is much better than the 420!

It is recommended to use the E2160 if you can

Of course, it's E2160 pull, the cache is 4 times that of 420, and it's dual-core, which is simply slaughtering a small race sheep.

Well, it's all antique-level CPUs, and if it's a product of the same generation, it's definitely better to be Pentium,

It depends on what you do, if the single chip is definitely M730, it is better, after all, the main frequency and the second-level cache are better than Celeron, but 420 is the YONAH core after all, and the chipset is replaced, so the performance will be greatly improved, my personal recommendation is to choose Celeron if it is a general study and office, after all, there are still advantages. If you have a surplus of RMB, you should buy a Pentium one.

Celeron 420 is good, Celeron M420 performance is better than the Pentium M processor 730, it is used.

It is the new YONAH core, and the performance and power consumption have been greatly improved. Performance ratio.

The Pentium M processor 740 is tall.

First, this question is asked in a more general way, AMD processor is the full name of AMD, including a variety of CPUs. And Celeron is the lowest-grade processor in Intel.

Second, if you compare AMD's mid-to-high-end processors with Celeron, AMD is naturally better. For example, AMD's A10 and FX bulldozer series are sure to be much better in the race.

But if you take AMD's low-end brands, Sempron and A4 compared with Celeron, it is naturally better than Celeron.

3. Classification of current popular CPUs: (clear at a glance) <>

Of course, it's Pentium, which is the first choice for high-end users, and the competition is strong in terms of performance.

Intel's CPU, from the same period under the same framework structure, performance: Core, Pentium, Celeron.

The Pentium is the ancestor of the Core, but the back waves of the Yangtze River push the front waves, so the Core is much better, and the Celeron is behind the Pentium and the Core, and the AMD4000 5000 is better than the Pentium

Pentium Processor Contest Jan is good!

Pentium belongs to the mid-to-high-end, and Celeron belongs to the low-end goods. There are only two CPU manufacturers on the market: Intel and AMD. In order to grab the low-end market, Intel took out a part of the CPU of the same frequency and turned off some of the functions (the main difference is that the second-level cache becomes smaller), and the trade name is "Celeron"; And the perfect and *** is called "Pentium".

Of course, it's galloping Celeron junk goods.

Because of the physical (quality) problem!

For example, each generation of CPUs and graphics cards comes out with the highest-end first, why?

These are composed of the core, a batch of 100, then 20 of them reach the high-end standard, 40 of the high-end standard, and so on, slowly divided into various levels, of course, the market is also for the market effect!

Slowly, there are more batches, and more low-end cores are accumulated, so you can mass-produce low-end CPUs and GPUs!

CPU and GPU are composed of architecture and core, of course, the architecture also contains a lot, and the cache is also divided into levels!

Why are there so many levels, because the core is made of transistors, and transistors are made of sand, and there are no two identical eggs in the world!

Take the Intel 3rd Generation i-Series, for example!

q2'12 out of i7, i5 of 34xx, 35xx

q3'12 out of the i5 33xx, i3 3220 or more.

q1'13 out of i3 3210

By analogy, it is the 21xx and 20xx of the Pentium, and the 16xx of Celeron

That's it, now the best value for money is!

Although 1610 is reasonable, I'm so sorry for the board, no matter how low it is, it's a good use!

For other models, because of the supply and demand relationship between the market and the factory, there are not many goods in the mainland!

For example, the 2120, the first Pentium that supports 1600! But the ** aspect.

It doesn't make much sense. Pentium and Celeron are both product brands. There are no rules.

It's just that the two different brands used for market positioning are aimed at different groups of people. Among them, the market positioning of "Pentium" is higher than that of "Celeron". Different markets need different products, which in turn restrict their product performance.

This is the purpose of existence.

Off topic: The emergence of the Pentium brand is the successor to the 486 processor. In the United States and most countries, Arabic numerals cannot be registered.

This has led to the 486 or compatible 486 processors from companies such as AMD and Cyrikos, Texas Instruments, etc., which also use the name 486. And the 586 processor after the 486 adopted the name Pentium and was registered. In the future, Pentium will be Intel's product brand, and its processor products will not be confused with other companies' products.

The Celeron product brand was used at that time for the Pentium brand 2 series processors. At that time, Celeron appeared to seize the low-end market with AMD. It has been used to this day.

Now Intel processor brand positioning Core i7 i5 i3 Pentium Celeron, similar products Celeron is entry-level, and the current better one is the Core series.