What went wrong with Johnson Johnson, a brand brand for many years, that caused the development of

The biggest reason may be because it needs some hormones in it, which will allow men to develop.

Johnson & Johnson may have excessive estrogen, and the current milk powder is getting more and more fake.

It may be that these products have added something to the production process.

I think there are a lot of reasons for this, don't you think so?

I think there may be some estrogen in it, which was caused by the wrong addition.

Estrogen is added, so it will be like this, and it will make the male mammary gland develop.

This is mainly related to their actual situation.

It may be because some of its products contain too high levels of hormones, which leads to the development of mammary glands in men.

In recent years, there have been countless lawsuits received by Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder incidents, with claims amounting to about 5 billion US dollars, equivalent to 350 billion yuan.

Johnson & Johnson is an old brand. Now Johnson & Johnson is involved in many fields, which are widely distributed in the world. His baby care products are widely recognized by consumers and healthcare professionals as a professional brand.

But it is such a well-known old brand that has been continuously breaking out of talcum powder carcinogenic incidents since 2012.

The largest compensation for the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder incident in these years should be nearly 4.7 billion in August 2018. The victims of that case, 22 women and their families, who claimed that long-term use of talcum-containing baby powder and other products containing talcum powder and other body-strengthening products containing talcum powder caused cancer and appealed. The U.S. Circuit Court in St. Louis, Missouri, found the charge upheld and awarded $100 million in damages.

As early as August 2017, Johnson & Johnson lost a lawsuit to a 63-year-old female patient with ovarian cancer named Eva Aceviglia, paying $100 million in compensation. This lady has also been using Johnson & Johnson's baby powder for a long time, but at the beginning, she didn't realize that it had anything to do with Johnson & Johnson, in fact, this is also human nature, after all, if you can use Johnson & Johnson's baby powder for forty or fifty years, you must trust this brand very much. Later, by chance, she learned that talcum powder caused cancer and began to discover the problem, until she finally took Johnson & Johnson to court.

Johnson & Johnson, as an old brand, has frequent scandals, which really chills old consumers!

Johnson & Johnson has lost a lot of money over the years, equivalent to about 350 billion yuan.

There must have been a lot of things, and then I lost a lot of money.

They have lost a lot of money over the years, but they have also made a lot of money.

I don't know exactly how much I've lost over the years, but it's definitely not a small amount.

I think that since this matter has not been explicitly reported, it means that they may have privately decided that you also spent a lot of money.

They should have lost a lot of money over the years, but they also made a lot of money.

Whether to use big brands and revenue.

level-related. Regardless of whether it is a big brand or a small brand, if something goes wrong and you are on the shelf, it is 100% hurt.

Harm. It doesn't matter if it's a big brand, it's a big brand, or a small brand.

There can be quality problems, so.

Don't talk about probability.

Finish. You let families in remote mountainous areas choose.

Big brands, they certainly won't.

Choose, it's not good to have that money to do something.

If you ask celebrities to choose miscellaneous brands, they will definitely not choose them, because.

I feel shameless for them.

So, how big a brand to choose, first look at your wallet, money.

The bag determines the brand you choose, while.

It's not quality.

I will be careful to choose every skin-friendly thing for my child. It's saying that not all big brands have problems, don't kill a brand with a stick, and don't use anything if you are suspicious of all products.

To live these consumer goods, you must continue to use them, after all, big brands are always safer than those three-no products.

So I have to continue to use it, but I just use it in a reduced amount!

Whether it's a big brand or not, you should be cautious when choosing baby products.

It is definitely necessary to choose a big brand, after all, there are a few problems, and the quality of the big brand is better than that of other copycats.

The first choice is a big brand, if you can't even rely on a big brand, I really don't know what to choose.

What's wrong now, why can't there be a forever brand? Is this true? Why can't the current brand fail after a few batches of products?

It's really worth thinking about, Johnson & Johnson is a big brand, my children have been using this product, this is also terrible, how can we trust these brands in the future? But the child has been using this brand of products, and the child will not have any problems! How difficult is it for a brand to stand firm in people's minds, it takes many years to leave a good impression in people's minds, how can you destroy such a good brand?

It's incredible, how many years of hard work to build the brand, just so destroyed, it's really sad, the leaders of the enterprise should reflect on it! Find out why! In doing so, you have hurt your own brand and the hearts of the people.

A small brand is not necessarily bad, only after trying it will you know that it is best to suit yourself! You don't have to pursue brands in life!

Although the quality of such a big brand is still very good, if you don't believe in the big brands, how can the small brands believe it? However, the problems of big brands should not be underestimated, and we consumers should keep our eyes open, understand consumption, rational consumption, and healthy consumption.

On July 13, it was reported that everyone is no stranger to Johnson & Johnson, which recently faced sky-high compensation for carcinogenic incidents caused by talcum powder and other products, and it was reported that 22 women had been carcinogenic due to long-term use of Johnson & Johnson's baby powder and other beauty products containing talcum powder, so 22 women and their families sued Johnson & Johnson in court.

In response, a jury in Missouri, the United States, found that the allegation that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products contained asbestos and caused them cancer was valid, and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay 100 million dollars in compensatory damages and 100 million yuan in punitive damages.

Twenty-two women and their families said they had been using Johnson & Johnson's baby powder and other talcum-containing beauty products for a long time. They accused Johnson & Johnson of having known about asbestos in its products since at least the '70s, but failed to warn consumers. It is reported that the total amount of compensation faced by Johnson & Johnson this time is 100 million US dollars, which is the highest compensation amount in talcum powder rights protection cases so far.

Anshiyou is a new Chinese trademark launched by Johnson & Johnson.

Stephen Lanzo, an investment banker in New Jersey, USA, sued Johnson & Johnson, alleging that he developed mesothelioma because of the company's talcum powder. Recently, the court ruled in favor of Stephen that he would receive $30 million (about 100 million yuan) in compensation, and his wife Kendra (Kendra) could also receive $7 million (about 44.13 million yuan).

Stephen, 46, who received a huge amount of compensation, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2016, which he said was caused by Johnson & Johnson's Bubu talcum powder, which he had used for more than 30 years. So the Stephens took Johnson & Johnson and a ** business to court, saying that Johnson & Johnson knew that the products contained asbestos fibers that can cause cancer, but did not warn the public.

In the United States, there are thousands of lawsuits claiming that talcum powder products from Johnson & Johnson and others cause cancer. It is reported that talcum powder is made of talc, and some studies have shown that talc has a risk of cross-contamination with asbestos during the mining process.

It is reported that Johnson & Johnson will bear 70% of the $37 million compensation in the lawsuit, and 30% will be borne by talc ** merchants, and the court may add punitive damages next week. Johnson & Johnson expressed disappointment with the court's decision, while Talc intends to appeal the verdict.

It is understood that asbestos fiber is a very small, almost invisible fiber, when these small fibers are released, they can float in the air for a long time and be inhaled into the human body, and the inhaled asbestos fibers can accumulate in the human body for many years, attach and deposit in the lungs, causing lung diseases. Exposure to asbestos fibres can cause diseases such as lung cancer, mesothelial carcinoma – pleural or peritoneal cancer, asbestosis – scarring of the lungs due to fibrosis of tissues in the lungs (asbestosis).

The American Cancer Society said it was unclear whether talc products would increase a person's risk of cancer. The U.S. National Toxicology Program has not yet fully examined talc as a possible carcinogen.

This is not necessarily, according to common sense, this ** is definitely wrong, and general brand goods do not have so much profit margin.

There is also whether you can see whether to send test strips or not, a box of test strips will cost more than 200.

A method verification Through the Johnson & Johnson customer center, you can check the origin of this product.