Let s discuss why the price of a train ticket is the same as a seat ticket?

This is the country's dragon industry, and the better the business, the higher the price will increase in the Spring Festival. The food on the train is several times that of the outside.

Trains, like buses, are public goods provided by the state, and their ** is not determined by the market, but designated by the state**. The same is true for those who take the bus, whether they have a seat or not**, and the same is true for those who take the train, and whether they have a seat or not**.

If it's cheaper to have no seats, it's not like people are buying no seats, and there are empty seats on the bus, and then they just sit down.

As a student, I am not seated and hard seated in the same carriage, because you can't get a hard seat ticket and you don't have a seat, so the country probably won't let you discount you in the form of a half ticket. After all, the ticket for the hard seat is not very expensive, and it is even more difficult to find a ticket with the Spring Festival and the student's holiday, so the standing ticket is the same as the hard seat, I don't think it is too much, you can also sit in some unoccupied seats to rest and rest, or you can also transfer to another train.

Charges are made according to the distance traveled. The passenger said that I don't count, this has to ask Mr. Tie!

Standing tickets and sitting tickets are at the same price, which can guarantee that sitting tickets will be sold out first than standing tickets. If the two prices are different, there may be a situation where the standing tickets are sold out and there is still a surplus of seats, so that some people who have bought standing tickets can sneak into their seats. Standing tickets and seat tickets are priced the same to ensure that no one "steals" the seat. ‍‍

Why train tickets and tickets are a price, this question still has to ask the leaders above, but if you want to buy a ticket or book a ticket online in advance, you can find a seat to book a ticket on that day, the general situation is not the New Year's holiday, there are still tickets with a seat, if you travel or go home to avoid the peak period, a seat ticket is hard to find, then you have to stand, no way!

The reason why there are standing tickets is because so that more people can get on the bus. When holiday tickets are tight, sometimes standing tickets are not available. If you buy a standing ticket, you don't have to stand the whole time, you can find an empty seat where no one is there.

You don't need to sit the whole time if you buy a ticket, right? And because this can make passengers feel more fair, it can also avoid some profit problems caused by the difference in **. So until now, the ** of train tickets and station tickets are the same.

The basic fare of a train ticket is based on the mileage traveled! So the regular sitting ticket is the same as the standing ticket!

Hard-seat tickets only have a basic shipping fee and no add-ons. The contract was fulfilled upon arrival. Sleepers are add-on sleepers for basic shipping.

The main consideration is to make it possible for some people who can't afford to buy a ticket to reach their destination! Because there is always a priority for people who buy tickets, there is always one person who can't buy a seated ticket, so it is necessary to sell standing tickets, but it is also necessary to consider the reasons of fairness and justice, and also to put pressure on the people who buy tickets later! So it's the same, there is no seat for the person who buys the ticket later, it's a standing ticket!

Personally, I think so!

Buying a train ticket online is exactly the same as buying a ticket at the station**.

A handling fee of 5 yuan will be charged for picking up tickets at a different railway station or sales point, and there is no charge for picking up tickets at the train station of origin.

First, "a price for standing tickets and sitting tickets" reflects the principle of equal opportunities, in the face of the tide of ticket purchases, if the people in front of them buy tickets, and the rest are standing tickets, then, the latter to buy tickets must be unconvinced. Why? Money is average, you can buy it, why can't I buy it?

At this time, it can only be solved through "equal treatment". In chronological order, first-come, first-served, latecomers can only buy standing tickets or take their seats on the next trip.

Second, "one price for standing tickets and sitting tickets" still reflects a fair principle. We can't guarantee that the person who buys a standing ticket will always stand, and those who buy a ticket have to sit until the end of the line, in fact, many people buy a standing ticket and find a seat on the way. If it is necessary to distinguish the price of the standing ticket from the price of the sitting ticket, then it is reasonable only if the standing ticket customer himself guarantees not to sit in the seat.

But this is not possible. Since the station and seat tickets are the same price, the customers who buy station tickets and buy seat tickets have equal opportunities and equal status, so that people will not feel that the people who buy station tickets cannot afford to buy seat tickets, and they will not say that such customers are stingy.

Third, "the price of standing tickets and sitting tickets" is responsible for customers. Everyone knows that the seats occupy a larger space than the corridor, but the empty space in the carriage can stand people, and the standing space is much smaller than the seats. If customers come for the fare and buy station tickets, it will inevitably affect the management of train carriages.

Generally, the customers in the carriage are seams, and no one will speak civilized etiquette, gentle and frugal.

Everyone doesn't want to see the carriage overcrowded, and those who have seats don't want to be full of people standing next to them. In fact, the railway department stipulates the ratio of standing tickets to sitting tickets, which is quite reasonable. When you buy a ticket, the first to buy all the standing tickets, the later to buy the standing ticket, and then you can't buy the ticket later.

This is a responsibility to the customer. To sum up, "the price of a standing ticket and a sitting ticket" is reasonable and reasonable, and we don't need to worry and worry about buying a standing ticket that is the same as a sitting ticket if we are late.

Train station tickets and model tickets** are the same for the following reasons:

1.Principle of equal opportunity: Railway station tickets and seat tickets** are the same, in order to ensure fair competition for all ticket buyers, that is, first-come, first-served, last-purchased station ticket passengers do not have land sedan to enjoy more discounts.

2.Principle of fairness: If the standing ticket and the seated ticket** are different, then there may be a situation where the passenger who bought the standing ticket will not be able to obtain the seated ticket, which may cause dissatisfaction among the ticket buyer.

3.Cost reason: The ** of the sitting ticket and the standing ticket are the same, and in many cases it is due to cost considerations. For example, for a railway company, providing better service to passengers on a standing ticket may increase operating costs, so a standing ticket** may include this part of the cost.

In general, the fact that train tickets and sit-down tickets** are the same is the result of a number of factors.

The railway department sells non-seat tickets, which is also a way to allow more passengers to go home, passengers can voluntarily choose to buy, and the seats on the train are also mobile, passengers get off at one station, and standing passengers can take their seats. And, regardless of whether there are seats or no seats, the cost of capacity paid by the railway sector is the same.

The station ticket of the railway ticket can be said to be such a long process formed by history. At present, in many cities, there is no system of distinguishing station tickets in basic transportation facilities, and if we consider implementing it, the technical operation problems are also relatively large. Therefore, the change of the no-seat ticket price Heng Qingfeng has not yet been considered!

The reason why standing tickets are the same as sitting tickets is because the implementation of such the same is that they can be unified.

The station ticket on the train ** is the same as the seat ticket **, I personally think that the main reason for this situation is the result of the train station not encouraging people to buy station tickets, and the main purpose of them is to alleviate the amount of ** and so on.

Why don't there be seats on the train, but they are as expensive as the tickets? Say it and you may not believe it.

The full name of the train seat ticket is "reserved seat ticket", that is, a seat ticket with a reserved seat. A no-seat ticket is a "non-reserved seat ticket" and is also a seat ticket, but there are no reserved seats. <>

In fact, there should not have been a no-seat ticket, the railway was the first kind of cardboard ticket, once someone on the train got off halfway, this vacant seat would be empty to the terminal. In order not to leave seats free, a portion of non-seat tickets (about 5% per car) will be added.

However, the passenger flow soared 20 times during the Spring Festival, and the compromise solution to the lack of capacity was to sell additional seats on the premise of ensuring the safety of the train, so as to send as many passengers home as possible.

If a standing ticket has a different price than a seat ticket, and the station fare is low, then it should be stipulated that the person who bought the standing ticket cannot sit in the seat. To make an analogy: a person who has bought a seat ticket cannot go to a sleeper car. Passengers who have bought economy class by plane cannot go to first class. <>

What we buy is a service, how much money is spent, and what we enjoy is the corresponding service, and it is not reasonable to enjoy the best service at a low price. If the person who is seated in the ticket goes to the sleeper, it will also reduce the service in the sleeper.

The situation now is that people who do not have a seat can sit in their seats and enjoy the service of having a seat. In this respect, the same price is reasonable.

If the price of a seatless is lower than that of a seat, then unless a special seatless carriage is manufactured, the ticket inspector will inevitably be required to constantly check the ticket and get the passengers who buy the non-seat ticket out of the seat, which is almost impossible to achieve. <>

In fact, except for the Spring Festival and some particularly popular routes, the vehicles are often not full. So, if the no-seat price is low, people will indicate that they want to be no-seat if they know that a car is often unoccupied, because even a no-seat ticket can be used to sit on the seat.

According to this logical analysis, it seems that we are convinced, but - any problem is like a coin, there are two sides to it.

Some people will also question that consumers' right to fair trade is violated by having to choose to pay the same amount of money and accept discounted services after they have sold out tickets, as well as a clearly unfair contract. China's train fares are priced first, and the railway sector does not belong to the market subject of perfect competition, and its transportation responsibility has a strong public and public welfare nature.

Not very reasonable. But in the current situation, there is no better way. If a standing ticket is cheaper than a sitting ticket, let's say half the price, there will be chaos that you can't imagine.

The reason for this situation is that the railway is monopolized by the state, there are too many Chinese population and limited railway resources, take the same train as an example, you don't sit, naturally someone sits, and it is still crowded.

You can change the ticketing system, you must wait for the second-class tickets to be sold out, before you can sell the tickets without seats, these two tickets can not be sold at the same time, the order is poor, and the ticket price without seats is cheaper than the second-class seats, and there will be no off-season when everyone is greedy to buy a non-seat ticket but can have a seat. Other soft sleepers, hard sleepers, and first-class seats sell tickets unchanged, and the problem is solved

In the off-season, train tickets are very easy to buy and not stressful.

In the peak season, you can't buy a train ticket with money, so it's very stressful.

If the standing ticket is cheap, everyone buys the standing ticket, who buys the seat ticket, does he buy the standing ticket, and when he sees the empty seat and sits down, he says, I will stand up again, then he sits down, does he make up the fee?

For example, a restaurant is already full of customers, and 3 people come in to eat, and there is a restaurant around, and the boss says, I'll squeeze a place for you, add a table, and provide plastic chairs.

After eating, the customer said that he would not pay the bill, because he did not enjoy the same service as other customers, the chair was uncomfortable, and the table was small, is it okay?

Therefore, this problem is only a temporary phenomenon at present, and everyone understands each other.

The future development direction of China's railways is to increase the construction of passenger dedicated lines, build more high-speed railways and bullet trains, and meet the travel needs of passengers.

For example, the Beijing-Tianjin intercity between Beijing South and Tianjin, an average of 20 minutes a train, the running time is only 30 minutes, this train has never appeared ticket dealers reselling tickets, the most peak season, that is, passengers arrive at the railway station in the morning, the nearest ticket that can be bought is 1 o'clock at noon, passengers can still accept.

Looking forward to another 2-3 years, the problem of difficulty in buying tickets for China's railways will be completely solved. After solving the problem of difficulty in buying tickets, the railway department will better launch services to make passengers happy and happy.

People who often take the train know that DU actually really lets you sit for more than 10 hours, and you still don't want to! There are too many people overloaded inside, which seriously affects the environment and safety performance in the car, increasing a lot of uncertain factors, if the appropriate overload is still understandable, the iron boss has to overload in order for everyone to go home! The popular line, Yunnan-Guichuan, Lianghu and Guangzhou, there were many cars that year, and the high-speed rail could only be slowly increased