-
There are no constraints restricting the use of nuclear **. The INF Treaty lapses and allows the signatories to use nuclear weapons with impunity.
-
Because after the INF Treaty expires, countries will begin to research missiles, and there is a high probability that there will be a war.
-
Because this treaty plays a very important role in preventing nuclear war, many countries are abiding by it.
-
Because the UN secretary general does not understand military affairs, he exaggerates the failure of the treaty and excessively extrapolates it.
Medium-range missiles refer to land-based cruise missiles and ballistic missiles from 500 km to 5500 km. And longer-range intercontinental missiles are an important foundation of nuclear deterrence, but this is not included in the limits of the INF Treaty.
The purpose of the INF Treaty was only to reduce tensions in the US-Soviet confrontation and to limit the number of missiles from 500 km to 5,500 km. However, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the United States has become the sole ruler of the world, Russia is only left with an empty shelf, NATO's encirclement of Russian forces, and the northward expansion of the European Union have doubled the pressure on Russia.
It was Russia that announced its withdrawal from the treaty, but in fact it was just a slogan and a bargaining chip, and the United States made the same threat, but no one would think that it would take action. But Trump did walk the talk, and he retreated, which startled Russia, including the world.
But in fact, due to Russia's weakness, the significance of the INF Treaty is only to reduce the pressure on Russia, and there is no practical benefit to the United States except for restrictions, and the treaty is invalid, the United States can redevelop and deploy intermediate-range missiles, and Russia and other countries need to respond accordingly, which is exactly what the United States wants to get.
-
Because the INF Treaty is one of the conditions that can prevent a nuclear war. And the invalidation of the INF Treaty also means that this condition has been lost.
-
Because the United States withdrew, so that the United States has no restrictions, it can do whatever it wants, so the UN Secretary-General said so.
-
Because this secretary general did not really understand the various *** that the treaty would bring about if it was invalidated, so that's it.
-
NATO's encirclement of Russia's influence and the northern expansion of the European Union have doubled the pressure on Russia.
-
I feel that there are still many reasons for failure, after all, there is a certain gap, so it will fail in the end
Signing refers to a member state or individual, while ratification refers to the co-leader or organization of this body! Thank you. Hope!
The analysis of potential failure modes and consequences is as follows: >>>More
The Treaty of Wangxia is also known as the Sino-US Five-Port Trade Charter >>>More
Let f(x)=2x 3-3(a-1) 2*x+1 (a>=1).
1) Find the single increment interval of f(x). >>>More
Operate File --> Import --> Import to Stage" in order.