When did the West really find India, China, and Japan?

Vasco da Gama simply discovered the sea route from Europe to the East.

In fact, Europeans arrived in China by land (the Silk Road) long before this. As for India, it was even longer, and Alexander the Great once led his army to the Indus Valley.

It is precisely because of the huge profits brought by land ** that European countries have carried out a series of sailing adventures in order to find more convenient and safe ** passages.

The Italian Marco Polo came to China during the time of Kublai Khan, and later returned to China, if they took the initiative to find it, it would have been considered at that time, Japan knew that it was found and invaded by the United States in 1874.

Knowing that there was a China should be in the Yuan Dynasty, Marco Polo wrote a biography after returning (at that time, the biography written by Marco Polo was not believed by Westerners, thinking that Marco Polo made it up. They don't believe in another rich country in the East). The real understanding should be in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, the late Kangxi period sold opium in China (in fact, during the Kangxi Yongzheng period, the West sold opium to China, but it was not so serious.)

Yongzheng also strictly suppressed the sale of opium).

Actually, I think Asian girls just think some white people are handsome. Big eyes and high nose bridge, isn't this the beauty that is advertised now? But.

I think some girls would associate with white people. Marriage is in the minority. The cultural differences are too great.

And with the opening up of culture. They don't like white people that much.

It should be put. Maybe I watched too many Hollywood movies, and I felt that the ideal man should be like in the movie. Western men, not only in appearance, but also in the way they behave, may be relatively close.

Yes: No, it won't

The vast majority of Japanese girls still like to look for Japanese boys.

You, the Japanese, worship Westerners, especially Europeans and Americans.

Chinese girls are all the same, let alone JP.

The situation in China is similar.

Since 2012, China's GDP has surpassed that of Japan and India combined. Earlier in purchasing power parity terms.

It's not the same. China and India have comparable populations, while Japan has more than twice the population of South Korea. China, Japan, and South Korea are all land countries, while Japan is an island country.

In terms of the level of development, it is more appropriate. China's GDP and per capita GDP are more than three times that of India, Japan's GDP is more than three times that of South Korea, and its per capita GDP is two to three times that of South Korea.

You're talking about international relations, right? On the other hand, Japan and South Korea hate each other because of historical reasons and South Korea's arrogance. China and India should be big countries with territorial borders and Asia, and both want to become international powers, so the competition in all aspects is very fierce, so the tension in relations has become a result.

2009 World Economic (GDP) Rankings:

Total per capita.

2 Japan 52900 41480

3 China 33700 2520

11 Korea 9920 20240

13 India 9280 830

The total amount is about the same, but per capita you look at it.

Did you say it was 10 a.m. Beijing time? 11 a.m. in Japan, 4 a.m. in South Africa, and 9 p.m. the day before in Peru. India does not know ......

Eleven, four, blackjack the day before, half-past seven.

Africa's relations with China are okay.

Chinese New Year is equivalent to celebrating the New Year.

Christmas is the equivalent of the Chinese New Year.

Santa Claus at Christmas is the equivalent of the traditional Chinese stove king.

Christmas is comparable to the Chinese New Year.

For Christmas, China does not have a festival, but I have read a book that says that Santa Claus for Christmas is equivalent to the traditional Chinese stove king.

Indians have just finished lunch and are picking their teeth.

The Japanese prepare for lunch.

People in Germany, Italy, and Spain have just gotten off work, or on their way home, or chatting in a bar.

Canada, Brazil don't know, that point is estimated to be a morning jog.

India work, Japan starts work, Germany sleeps, Italy sleeps, Spain sleeps, Canada sleeps, Brazil sleeps.

I don't know much about Japan, so I would like to say a few more words about India.

China's science and technology, high-precision, and sophisticated military fields are at least stronger than India's, such as nuclear ** (Japan does not know), but the military hardware lags behind India and Japan, because the ** of the two countries are bought from Russia and the United States, and China's is self-made.

Looking at the military parade (sorry, it was the founding ceremony just now) It is not difficult to find that China's ** is actually quite backward (a self-examining tracked vehicle is flaunted for half a day) Although Japan was defeated in World War 2 and militarily backward, it has developed rapidly in recent years (they have F22 and even want to buy F35) India has aircraft carriers and armament*** These China do not have China's armed *** is still the direct 9 civilian *** transformation many years ago.

Although China has intercontinental missiles that can launch nuclear bombs into the United States, and India only has backward cruise missiles, its coverage can still cover half of China, and it is entirely possible to destroy China's nuclear base --- Sichuan, so that China will lose its combat capability for nuclear war.

Although China is richer than India and its national industry is far stronger than India (India has not been able to make its own tanks and will not even install the Su-30 assembly line if it has purchased it), if the Indians use tactics well (such as a surprise victory in a blitzkrieg war) and first attack China's military scientific research bases and other vital forces, China may be defeated by the Indians.

And the Indians' diplomacy is too friendly and unfriendly, which is obvious to all.

Moreover, India is likely to be used by the United States as a watchdog to contain China in the future, so India is China's most wary enemy of our time, and we should not underestimate it.

I saw a post before that listed some military facilities that India is stronger than China, and some Chinese actually replied that Kao has the ability to let them pick CS with me....

In addition, a certain gentleman upstairs said that the strongest in Asia is Israel, and even agreed.

Japan can't do it, the Japanese Army can't be compared with China at all, two words: garbage, so it's called"Self-defense"From the founding of the army to the present, the army has always been the focus of the Ministry of National Defense's care, and it is no wonder that it is not strong. Speaking of the Air Force, although Japan has a large number of American F-series fighters, it has a fatal weakness, that is, Japan's fighters are not allowed to carry air-to-surface missiles, and Japan is not allowed to have air-to-surface missiles, so if China wants to deal with the Japanese Air Force, it is enough to use ground anti-aircraft firepower, and the planes of small Japan can only stare dryly and cannot fight.

Finally, there is the navy, the first submarine in the Sea of Japan is generally more advanced than China, but Japan does not have nuclear submarines, and conventional submarines are one word for nuclear submarines: death. Therefore, in the face of Japan's occupation of control of the entire sea, and in the face of a fleet that has completely lost its superiority under the sea, the only thing waiting for them is destruction, so in general, Japan's military strength is far inferior to China, and what I said upstairs about Israel is not right, because Israel's military strength is not second only to China, but surpasses China, and in terms of independent research and development capabilities and advanced equipment, it can be said that Israel is not inferior to Russia and the United States.

Finally, India, in fact, India's current situation is not very good, in terms of equipment India is ahead of China, but India lacks independent research and development capabilities, mainstream equipment is completely imported, and its own research and development equipment is not even as good as Pakistan, now India is very similar to Taiwan, that is, it has very advanced equipment, but there is no supporting maintenance and repair equipment and conditions, just like Taiwan once had a fighter tire burst but there are no replaceable parts, and a large number of fighter parts must be imported from abroad, If China were to be able to produce its own parts and components for fighter jets, it could be said that once a war broke out between China and India, India's equipment would basically be scrapped as long as it was damaged, while China would be able to repair and put it back into battle. Therefore, the military power in Asia whose military strength is second only to China should be India, and Japan cannot defeat India at present, of course, whether it has the money to fight is another matter. It can be said that the military pattern of the whole of Asia is two superpowers and three powers, the "two supers" refer to Israel and China, and the three powers refer to India, Japan and Pakistan.

In fact, there is another military power that is Iraq, but it was destroyed by the Americans, and Iraq's military strength was actually ahead of China at that time. The above is purely a personal opinion, please do not spray professionally.

By strengthening cooperation with the United States, India's military strength may become the largest in Asia, and the number one target is no longer Pakistan's railway.

It should be Japan, Japan's economic strength is strong, and in addition, it is vainly trying to seek hegemony, so its military strength is actually very strong, and it has the full support of the United States, so we must not underestimate Japan, and we may not expect it in many aspects.

On the surface, it is India, but I personally think that India's economy is on the surface, if LZ has been to India, you will know how bad India's infrastructure is, so India's money is engaged in face engineering, and Japan is not only strong militarily, but also has a strong heritage, and has developed science and technology So I personally think it is Japan.

Japan is only second compared to China in terms of the size of its army, nuclear **, missiles and submarines, and its navy is the first in Asia. India and Japan cannot be compared, all high-tech equipment must be imported, the domestic military industrial system is incomplete and not matched, and the army is a universal brand. If it weren't for the nuclear **, the overall combat effectiveness of the army would not be comparable to that of Vietnam and North Korea.

Of course, it is Japan, and India's military equipment is all purchased, while India itself has just made its first flight of a generation fighter, and China's fourth-generation aircraft has just made its first flight, and there is a gap between the two by one generation. Japan has always had the United States, the first military country, to provide him with **, so of course it is Japan.

China's overall military strength in war ranks first, its air force ranks first, its navy ranks third, and its nuclear forces undoubtedly rank first. In the 2005 World Military Power Rankings of the International Arms Control and Disarmament Organization in Geneva, Switzerland, China ranked first in each of the seven national rankings, while Japan only had two, and India did not even have one.

India's military equipment is very strong, but it is not systematic, and most of it is bought from abroad, which is a weakness in the current affairs of the war. Second, although Japan also relies on foreign countries for the most part, Japan has a far stronger economy and military manufacturing industry than India, and as far as India and Japan are concerned, Japan's strength far exceeds that of India. However, Israel's military strength is undoubtedly very strong in Asia, and if it does not rank first, it is the second.

Japan, the simplest example, Japan has science and technology that is higher than hardness, and Japan is armed on its own, and India is armed with all nations!

It depends on who you are facing, anyway, the real military strength can only be tested by war.

How can you be so sure that the first is China? The question itself is debatable! I think in Asia, Japan and Israel are strong!

Neither.

Japan's combat strength is even stronger than China's...

Air Force: China and Japan are tied, although India buys a lot of fighters, but it is too miscellaneous, and the military industrial base is weak, and its strength is below that of China and Japan.

Army: China is the undisputed leader, followed by India, and Japan again, and Japan's military strength is limited.

Navy: Japan's old naval power, China and India are second, China is a little better than India, India's military equipment is very strong, but most of them are not systematic, most of them are bought from abroad, and it is a weakness of current affairs in the war.

In summary, in addition to the army, Japan's strength surpasses India's, think about India's war against Japan, no one can transport the Pacific, how to fight?

In addition, military strength is a manifestation of economic strength, and India's economic foundation is too bad to support it for a long time. Although Japan does not have a nuclear **, it has all the spare parts and fuel. In the event of war, it can be assembled in a matter of minutes.

Therefore, it is not without reason that Japan still occupies an important position in the international community for so many years.

India. Take the person and carry it!!