WHAT ARE THE FEATURES OF AMD CPUS AND WHICH ONE IS FASTER COMPARED TO INTEL?

Intel's CPU has a long history, once occupied more than 90% of the CPU market, because of advanced technology, reliable quality, popular with users, but expensive.

AMD started out as an obscure small company that made CPUs with backward technology and a lot of heat production. But it is not afraid, dare to challenge the market boss, has been working hard to move forward, in recent years technology and quality by leaps and bounds, coupled with low **, a sudden rise.

Overall, the highest-end CPU market is still dominated by Intel, as the technology is still leading and the reputation is good. For CPUs in the same price range, AMD has better quality and better performance than Intel.

Is AMD more cost-effective than Intel? Talking nonsense with your eyes open! I don't know, don't talk nonsense, it's already on par in terms of cost performance!

As soon as the E5 comes out, K8 is going to die! Is there a bird's value for money?? Unless you are below 300 and compete with Celeron!!

This performance gap in ordinary households is not visible.

If you don't believe it, find two computers with similar configurations on different platforms.

You can tell the difference between AMD and Intel.

The bottleneck of gaming PCs these days is the graphics card.

AMD's cost performance is higher than Intel's, and the performance problem is not compared due to different models.

Another Intel*** point, the heat resistance is very strong, but generally speaking, there will be no problems with the CPU, it all depends on personal preferences.

Each has its own characteristics, and all have been ahead of the curve. At the moment Intel is better architected. However, the performance at the same price is actually the right number, otherwise how to sell it. Either way, it's okay.

The microstructure of the processor is different, each with its own characteristics, but Intel is better.

What are the differences between AMD and Intel's CPUs, and how to choose?

The APU is suitable for more programs, but it is not good for playing games, and the frame drops are serious. The IPU is suitable for playing games, the response is fast, and the frame rate is stable, but the program is open more than average, and if you play games, use Intel's CPU. Don't think about APUs

If you talk about cost performance, AMD's processor is more advantageous. In addition, many of Intel's processors have increased in price since September last year, and they are still at a relatively high level, which is not very worthwhile.

Since last September, even if it is a loose piece, and regardless of the old or new model, Intel CPU has begun to increase in price, and even the dual-core and four-threaded 4th generation i3 has risen to almost 600 yuan, which is simply amazing. i5-8400 is the fastest running speed closest to Hong Kong reporters in the price increase army, directly from more than 800 yuan to 1670 yuan in a month, almost doubled**! Even if more than half a year has passed, the box is still in the ** position of 1699 yuan.

AMD's side seems to be much more conscientious, 6 cores and 12 threads of Ryzen 5 2600 even if it is boxed, the price is only 1359 yuan (JD PLUS members can get it for 1299 yuan), and its big brother Ryzen 5 2600X is not more than 1600 boxed, it is simply impossible to praise AMD.

The parameters are as above, the advantage of the eighth-generation Core i5-8400 over the ryzen 5 2600 next door is that the single-core frequency is higher, the maximum turbo frequency is reached, and there is also a nuclear display that is better than nothing, which can play some role in some emergencies.

Looking at the Ryzen 5 2600, it has obvious advantages, such as supporting multi-threading, so that 6 cores can virtualize 12 threads, which is more comfortable when running some multi-threaded applications. The second is the overclocking function, even with the cheap B350, B450 can enjoy this benefit, instantly get the performance that matches your big brother 2600X. The new 12nm process also enables it to maintain a stable state of power consumption and heat generation when multiple cores are running at the same time.

Finally, in the case of much better data on paper than Intel, Ryzen 5 2600 boxed** only costs 1359 yuan, while Intel boxed is more expensive and requires more than 1699.

How do brands compare to brands? The two specific models can be compared.

In a word, if you have money, you will get Intel, and if you don't have money, you will get AMD.

Let's put it this way!

It depends on what you come to use, play games with AMD, and the office is of course Intel!

When it comes to performance, if you have enough budget, you can buy the latest one! The difference between the two processing powers is not very big now! There's no need to be so embarrassed!

I'm leaning towards Intel's albeit slightly more expensive.

Compared with Intel at the same level, AMD will have more power consumption and heat generation, but the price will be cheaper.

This is to find the right cost performance for you.