After firefighters come to the house to extinguish the fire, the property claims compensation for th

It took 600 tons of water to extinguish the fire, and I guess your house is not on fire in the kitchen, but the whole building is on fire. What is the concept of 600 tons of water? 600 tons, which is 600 cubic meters, which is equivalent to a swimming pool 1 meter deep, 30 meters long and 20 meters wide!

With so much water, fill your house with a lot more! If you have a single villa, then the community will suffer, if it is a single-family residential building, then the corridor, the neighbor's house below will not have a flood?

Even if what you say is true, then you must also distinguish what it is used forOutdoor fire hydrantsThe water inside is stillIndoor fire pipeswater inside.

The difference between the two: the water in the outdoor fire hydrant comes from the municipal engineering reserve fire water consumption, which is for emergency use, free use, and there is no reason for the community property to ask you for compensation.

The water in the fire pipes in the residential corridor generally comes from the roof water tank, which can only store about 20 cubic meters at most, according to what you said, to use 30 water tanks, or to start the fire pool, there are about two or three hundred cubic meters of water consumption.

All of the above situations are emergency use, whether indoor or outdoor, in the community, as long as you pay the property fee, the property has the obligation to ensure the safety of residents, not intentional arson, then it is impossible to claim compensation, and it is unreasonable to do so.

I don't know much about the legal requirements for firefighting. However, according to everyone, it seems that there is no need to provide a fee.

When there is a problem, we must first communicate, explain the situation, explain the cause of the matter, and consult with each other. All ways to solve problems can be better handled by relying on clear regulations and relevant rules. Fire protection is a public facility in the community, of course, the use of water should also be responsible for the management of the community, now the basic property company management, the use of municipal tap water, from the inlet end of the community directly out of a pipe, to the fire pool, so the water fee is calculated by the total water meter of the property, not counted on the owner.

I don't know what you think about this issue?

Of course, it is unreasonable, generally 600 tons of water can not be used to extinguish the fire at home, even if you want to compensate, you must let the property issue relevant basis and compensate according to the actual water use.

This is unreasonable, because the water used by firefighters to extinguish fires is purely for emergency relief, and is required for maintaining social and public order, and should be unconditionally requisitioned.

After the firefighters came to the house to extinguish the fire, the property demanded compensation for the cost of 600 tons of fire water, which was unreasonable. First of all, according to China's property law, the fire protection facilities in the community belong to the owners who jointly own. According to the Fire Protection Law, the accident loss is compensated by the ** unit.

Secondly, the fire truck has its own water source and will not necessarily use the water source in the jurisdiction, so it is unreasonable for the property to claim compensation.

The property claims 600 tons of water for fire fighting, which is very unreasonable. If the house is on fire, the firefighters come to the rescue, it is an obligation and a responsibility, the firefighters helped you save the house, and also blackmailed people, which is obviously unreasonable!

Very reasonable, but the property needs to pay for the firefighters' work, including the cost of fuel for the car, mental damage, machine usage fees, if you can't afford to pay then let the fire continue to burn! Later on, you need to pay for mismanagement costs hahaha.

Reasonable, but there is a premise, the community fire, whether it is man-made or natural disasters, or accidents, are not strict management of the community, improper prevention, or unqualified building materials, the fire department is responsible for the corresponding responsibility, such as environmental damage, waste of public resources, endangering the public safety of people and things around, and thoroughly investigate whether there is tax evasion, the judgment of the judgment, the grasp of the catch, and the causal relationship.

It is in line with the fact that 600 tons of water can be extinguished at a time: taking the dispatch of 3 high-pressure water cannon fire trucks (for watering the outer wall of the building) as an example, the high-pressure water output rate of a single water cannon is 60l seconds, the number of tons of water is 60 seconds, and the number of water cannons is 600 minutes) = 56 minutes.

The fire truck is free of charge for its own water (taking a single unit with 12 tons of water as an example, it can only be used for minutes), and the actual fire fighting is bound to add the fire well in the community, and this part of the water fee is borne by who uses it. If the first point is located in the public part of the building and there is no specific responsible person, the water fee is generally shared by all the owners of the building; If the ** point is located indoors, the water fee shall be borne by the responsible person or the user of the household.

It is unreasonable, that is to say, don't extinguish the fire in the future, burn it casually, because the firefighters can't afford to pay for it.

Of course, it is unreasonable, first of all, the property does not have such a right, and the water used is municipal tap water, which cannot be counted on the owner. It is reasonable and reasonable.

Irrationality! If you don't fire fighting, you will also be charged the same fire extinguishing fee! Exit fee! Labor costs! Equipment maintenance fee usage fee! Just calculate the cost of 6,000 tons of water.

Unreasonable, the water in the fire hydrant comes from the municipal engineering reserve fire water consumption, and these water are used for emergency use.

I think this is a bit unreasonable, 600 tons of fire water should be shared by the property and the owner, after all, the property also has the responsibility to ensure the safety of the community.

Fire compensation for water bills, reasonable. However, the fire department should investigate whether there are illegal acts in property management, and deal with illegal property companies in accordance with the law.

The water for all fire pipes is paid by the Municipal Construction and Water Authority, and there are no property water charges. Therefore, it is unreasonable for the property to ask for compensation.

Very reasonable, no problem, give it to him, and then ask him for police pay, and then check if their fire protection facilities meet the standards and whether there are any violations.

Reasonable, how many tons of water is used, plus 10 times and 10 times the cost of firefighting.

Reasonable, the fire department can also fine the property 6000 for improper property management

It is certainly unreasonable, the underground fire tether is public and will not be compensated.

Reasonable, by the way, the cost of this police trip was charged.

can compensate it, as long as he dares to ask for it, sentence him to a property, harm public safety, fire protection is not in place, arrest their bosses, and punish him with a mother.

The fire hydrant is not a water meter, it is connected to the municipal fire water, and there is no charge involved. It is advisable to complain directly to the fire brigade.

Reasonable, next time it's on fire, don't call the police if you have the ability, extinguish it yourself, really everyone has it, shameless.

The property demanded compensation for the cost of 600 tons of fire water was unreasonable, and the property did not call 119 if it had the ability, and the property put out the fire by itself.

There are special fire-fighting pumps in the community, and the fire-fighting water does not enter the water meter, how can there be costs? If there is no pump, or the pump is just a decoration that cannot be used, then the fire department will not only not have to pay compensation, but also hold the property and real estate developer responsible. Residents can also be held accountable for damages.

Do you want firefighters to pay compensation? Property it's not big enough.

Reasonable hammer, your house is on fire, of course, use your water to fight the fire, and it would be good if you didn't ask for wages.

A bunch of nonsense that the fire brigade extinguishes the fire, and the water is a fire hydrant. Domestic water pipes, water pressure and hydraulics are insufficient. The fire hydrants are all public water in the country, and if you can't use the domestic water in the community, how can the property ask for compensation.

Yes, labor costs, fire truck fuel costs, wear and tear costs, and troublesome properties are also settled.

It's very reasonable and capable, you don't want others to kill it.

This is not supposed to be. There is no charge for the water used for firefighting, and you have to hand it over to the relevant authorities for disposal.

It should not be paid, the water bill must be paid, but 50,000 yuan is too high, and the property should be asked to come up with the corresponding evidence and receipts.

You should not pay, if the property still insists on letting you pay, you can go directly to the relevant department to complain.

This cost does not need to be borne, and the use of fire trucks is generally borne by **, and there is no need for individuals to bear it.

It should not be paid, and there is no need to pay any fee for fire water, and if the property is still mandatory, it should be handed over to the relevant departments for processing.

There is no need to pay any fees for fire water, and if the property makes you pay the relevant fees, you must use the law to protect your rights.

In daily life, when we encounter a fire, we usually think of fire alarm**119, and then there will be firefighters driving fire trucks to extinguish the fire. When it comes to extinguishing fires, people definitely think of water. Generally, fire trucks have to use a large amount of water to extinguish the fire every time they arrive at the scene, but no one knows whether the cost of fire water should be borne by the individual or the public.

In fact, we all know that fire protection is a public facility in every community. This should have been the responsibility of the community manager, but now it is generally the property management company that is in charge. The water used by the fire brigade is all municipal tap water, but it is connected to a pipe from the water inlet end of the community, through which it leads to the fire pool.

This water bill is eventually calculated on the property's total water meter, but never on the owner.

According to the relevant laws and regulations, the rescue costs of China's fire are borne by the city, including the fuel cost of the vehicle, the cost of wear and tear, and the water cost used in firefighting. No matter whose house is on fire and the fire truck is called, no matter how much water is used after the fire brigade arrives, the property cannot use this to charge the residents.

To sum up, the water used to extinguish the fire with a fire truck in your house is free, and the property asking your family to pay 50,000 yuan for water is pure extortion. Even if it is charged according to the residents' water use, one ton of water will only be charged yuan, and the 50,000 water fee is equivalent to saying that it is 17,857 tons of water used by your household. But such a huge amount of water consumption is enough for a fire truck to use it for five days without stopping.

Your family only has a house, and no matter how big the fire is, it will be extinguished in an hour, and at most a few hundred yuan of water will be used, and the water bill of 50,000 yuan can be used to extinguish fires in several areas. The property is clearly bullying your family for not understanding these problems of fire water and water bill management, and taking advantage of the fire to rob. In the face of such an arrogant and unreasonable request, you can show the other party the relevant legal provisions to him.

If the other party is still vexatious, call the police directly and let the police solve the matter.

No. Because the fire rescue loss is a social public service, no fees are charged, and the property is detrimental to your own personal rights and interests, if the cause of the fire is not due to man-made reasons, Si Tsai does not need to purchase and sell the land code line.

Personally, I think it should not be paid, because the rescue water does not need to pay any fees, according to the fire protection law of the People's Republic of China, Qinghanmeng National Comprehensive Fire Rescue, full-time fire brigade to fight fires, emergency rescue shall not charge any fees.

If the fire is caused by your own personal cause, and then causes serious damage to the property or common areas of the community, you should pay compensation.

This does not need to be paid, we can open this law and regulation, the Fire Protection Law, in this 49 articles have stipulated that fire protection belongs to rescue emergency water. There will be no charge for the materials and water needed to extinguish the fire during the rescue. There has been a similar problem in Chongqing before, and the chief of the fire brigade responded to this question, in the area where the residents are located, the fire department that has a fire due to an accident or a fire caused by other former silver transportation will not charge the residents this fee for going to extinguish the fire.

For the property, asking people to pay 50,000 yuan for firefighting is obviously an unreasonable requirement. It is impossible to get 50,000 yuan in tuition fees for firefighting. According to the calculation of the authoritative department, a water flow rate of one ton of water, if you want to spray it out, then it takes nearly three minutes, 50,000 yuan of water fee, then it is equivalent to 10,000 tons of water, this fee obviously does not meet the charging process, and it does not comply with the legal procedures, so the owner does not need to pay this money.

In life, we encounter some problems that we don't understand, you can search on the Internet, or you can call the fire department to understand the details of this cost, generally speaking, we can find the answer on the Internet, when we call the fire department, the fire department will also give us a reasonable explanation, and we can also get the answer from it. <>

But having said that, we still have to pay attention to this fire safety issue, try not to have this fire disaster as much as possible to remove this fire hazard, after all, after the fire, it will directly cause our economic losses, it is likely to affect other tenants and other residents, if other residents suffer losses because of this, we also need to bear this liability for compensation, so it will lead to a greater economic impact on us, after all, it is not easy to make money in these years, so remember to use fire safely.

The house was on fire Lu Pei, called the fire truck, after the fact, the property let pay 50,000 yuan for firefighting water, I personally think that you should pay the water bill, because after all, Xiangchang is your family use, but this amount is a bit high.

The water connected to the community should be out of us, but we can't use 600 tons of water, so the property fee paid when using water is also related to money. For example, if there is a thief in the community and the property security guard is injured by the thief, the cost of the security guard should be borne by the person who stole it, so if the owner does not violate the regulations and causes the fire, it should be the property to compensate, and the relevant compensation records can be taken out, and the water can be lived. If it is the community that stipulates that it is necessary to compensate, it can be compensated, because the water to be compensated is not said by the property, and it also needs to be based, so we have to ask him to come up with a certificate of 600 tons of water, so that it is okay.