The mother in law has two sons, the eldest son doesn t have a wife, and the money is basically used

When the mother is the two sons, the palms and backs of the hands are meat, but it is impossible to end a bowl of water to that flat, the two sons will have different money to give them in different situations, but it is best to let the two sons stand on their own, if they don't help well, they will help out the contradictions, and the second son should take the initiative to lend a hand when the eldest brother needs it, after all, it is a brotherhood.

I definitely don't want to buy it, this kind of is too partial, the eldest son is not married, so he paid half of the money to buy a house with his brother, it is clear that he bought it for his brother, there was no contradiction at the beginning, and there will be a contradiction after a long time, I don't know what my mother-in-law thinks, do you want two people to fight, if the eldest son has no opinion, forget it, now the eldest son has an opinion, why do you have to do this, it is not recommended that the eldest son pay for this house, if you want to buy it, buy a house of your own, Instead of one person and half of the kind, this can avoid economic disputes in the future, and since mothers are so partial, the eldest son should think about himself instead of giving any money, and save some money for himself.

The eldest son can only keep his opinions, and the second son has children, and the mother-in-law can only post the money to the second son. Only when the eldest son has a family and children will the mother-in-law give money to both sons.

Housework should be resolved through negotiation, mother-in-law only bought a house, two sons live together is not convenient, especially the younger son has a family, has a wife, has children, it is more inconvenient, it is recommended that the younger son and his wife and mother-in-law, brother negotiate and work together, for the eldest brother is buying a house, after all, the eldest brother has not yet started a family, he should also start a family, so he also needs everyone's help, and finally I wish you a happy family.

are all sons, for the sake of fairness, the eldest son can not pay this money, and he can't be comforted if he doesn't marry his wife.

This house belongs to your mother-in-law, she has the final say, and in the future, her mother-in-law will make a will, and whoever she gives it to will be whoever, there are many brothers, and she is long-winded! Is this raising children to prevent old age?

Summary. Hello, I suggest that you leave it alone as a wife for the time being, in this case it is best to choose to let your husband come forward, after all, as a child of parents, the situation of favoritism on one side will indeed exist, but you can't ask the younger son for money and not ask the eldest son for money, this behavior is not right, and it will also make the unbalanced relationship between brothers more acute.

The mother-in-law has two sons, why does the wife always ask the younger son for money, and the wife has the right to take care of it.

Hello, I suggest that you as a wife leave it alone for the time being, in this case, it is best to choose to let your husband come forward, after all, as a child of the parents, the situation of favoritism on one side will indeed exist, but you can't ask the younger son for money and not ask the eldest son for money, this kind of behavior is not right, and it will also make the unbalanced relationship between brothers more acute.

As a wife, you should choose to resist, you should have a good talk with your husband, and don't give money to your husband, mother-in-law is a very eccentric behavior.

Discuss with your husband well, let him understand that this is wrong, and communicate with his family, so that he can better solve the problem.

Well. In short, you'd better reduce your appearance, it's your husband's own complaint and internal contradictions, you can teach him how to do it, but you can't say something in person that shouldn't be said by Yinchang, it's easy to misunderstand.

According to the Marriage Law and Judicial Interpretation III of the Marriage Law, Article 10 If one of the husband and wife signs a contract for the sale and purchase of real estate before marriage, pays the down payment with personal property and takes out a bank loan, and repays the loan with the joint property of the husband and wife after marriage, and the real estate is registered in the name of the party paying the down payment, the real estate shall be disposed of by agreement between the two parties at the time of divorce. If no agreement can be reached in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the people's court may make a judgment that the immovable property belongs to the party whose property rights are registered, and that the loans that have not yet been repaid are the personal debts of the party whose property rights are registered. In the case of divorce, the party registered in the property right shall compensate the other party for the joint repayment of the loan and the corresponding increase in property value between the parties after marriage.

The ownership of the property is subject to the registration of the title deed, as it is pre-marital property and belongs to one party.

Zongheng Legal Network Guizhu lawyer.

The house demolition is subject to registration, and the property right of the individual registered before marriage belongs to the individual.

Lawyer Hou Jianhuai.

It is the joint property of the husband and wife and can be returned.