Why do many of today s scientific theories seem difficult to perfect?

Perfection is a concept, and everyone interprets it from a different perspective.

It is true that in this era in which we live, in the context of scientific development, some theories have reached the point of peak, and there is no way to surpass them in the current state, so they seem to be perfect. But when the environment changes and the level of technology improves, these seemingly perfect things will become less able to adapt to us, and we feel very backward and have many loopholes.

To judge that something is relative, there must be a reference.

If it is absolute, then things cannot be perfect, because the progress of our technology will never end, it will never end.

Therefore, the perfection of things depends on the conditions. Just as Marxist philosophy says that the motion of things is absolute, and the relative is the same when at rest.

In fact, I think that today's scientific theories are not all "perfect", and in the so-called era of knowledge, there are many updates and supplements of scientific theories. However, after many scientific discoveries in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the system of scientific theories has been relatively complete and rigorous, and many of today's discoveries are only detailed. It's a lack of exploration.

The spirit of criticism must have a basis for criticism.

There's no theory or objection to overturn it for the time being, and it's perfect to take it.

It's like the sky is round and the earth is like a place where others thought it was right before.

Therefore, it is not enough to have a critical spirit, but to have a persistent spirit of science in order to separate the false from the true.

Many theories are indeed perfect within a certain range of applications.

No one lacks a critical spirit, and if you overturn a scientific theory that everyone agrees on, you will become famous all over the world and rich enough to rival the country. The question is, can you?

Do scientific work is also unwilling to the most others.

If you think about the relationship with China, what project funding is going on now, and so on.

Professors are all running these.

There is still time to be criticized.

Isn't it miserable in case someone else voted down on your own project.

This is not academic and perfect.

It's that intellectuals are becoming more and more spineless now.

There's something that people can't perceive right now, and it takes a genius to discover it.

Just like Newton's Galileo is certainly perfect for the undiscoverable.

Maybe hundreds of years ago, people thought their perceptions were perfect.

There is no such thing as perfection.

If you think about it, those scientific theories are also untenable.

More than 2,000 years ago, the Roman orator and orator Cicero told the story of a missionary who showed an atheist a picture of a group of praying worshippers who survived a subsequent shipwreck as a testament to the power of prayer to protect people. The atheist asked immediately.

"Where are the portraits of those who drowned after praying? "The missionaries' attempts to use a few examples to deceive the truth with illusion are flawed by the atheists: the drowned worshippers are dead, and it is certainly impossible to crawl out of the bottom of the sea to spread their stories everywhere.

The missionary made a logical fallacy – "survivorship bias."

The more blunt translation calls it "evidence of silence", and more bluntly it is "dead people don't speak." Such examples abound in life: suppose that in an absolutely rational market environment, there is a ** trading market, and the annual investment risk and return are comparable.

Hire 16 monkeys and give them two buttons.

One buys, one sells, and lets them randomly press every day – checking earnings once a year, and the monkeys who lose money are driven out, keeping only those who make a profit. So, there were 8 monkeys in the second year, 4 in the third year, 2 in the fourth year, and 1 in the fifth year. A monkey can actually make a profit in the ** trading market for five consecutive years.

If this monkey is a human, we can call him "** master", "** big bull", "stock god". Each family will interview him to understand his diet, lifestyle, religious beliefs, etc., and then summarize it into a book "The Philosophy of Success", which has become a bestseller of the year.

Topped the bestseller lists. But because it's a monkey, it all comes down to luck. But at the same time, behind this monkey standing out, there are 15 more unknown monkeys.

It's counterintuitive that three proven scientific theories are so difficult to accept!

Quantum mechanics is at the microscopic level. My understanding is that we go to the casino to play roulette, and we can't be sure how many it is, which is quantum science, but after many times the numbers will be evenly distributed on the individual numbers, and it becomes a macroscopic certainty. So it shows that God is single, and the hand speed is very fast, and the macrocosm we see is that God has given us a definite world with countless hand speeds, but on the microcosm, even God doesn't know that the dice will fall on **.

The theories of relativity and quantum mechanics are both seemingly absurd, but in fact very scientific. For example, the theory of relativity, where the speed of light is constant, and time and space change due to the speed of motion, is inconsistent with our daily observations, and many paradoxes are derived: such as the twin paradox, and so on.

Quantum mechanics is even more like a theory from another world, such as a double-slit interference experiment where an electron can pass through two slits at the same time, or the uncertainty principle, where you can't know the position and velocity of an object at the same time. As for the more famous Schrödinger's cat paradox, it is even more divine.

As a result, he developed the idealistic theory that human consciousness (observation) determines the objective world (note that this theory is a theory proposed by mainstream physicists in quantum mechanics). However, experiments and theories continue to prove the correctness of quantum mechanics, and have led mankind to make breakthroughs in many major basic research in modern times. Therefore, quantum mechanics can be ranked first in the seemingly absurd, but actually very scientific theory.

Even Albert Einstein could not understand and refused to admit it.

String theory is the most scientific theory, but it is currently incomprehensible to strings and has become an absurd theory. The string is understood as a curly dimension, which deepens the problem, and the scientific community naturally gives up. But in fact, if we abandon the esoteric question of the nature of space and understand that the closed-loop string is the smallest structure, the understanding of all things is much simpler.

The string is a closed-loop **, and countless strings form a force. The lion completes the connection through the ** mode of the string, then the string becomes a weak force. The ** of the lion forms the daily gravitational force, magnetic force and strong force, and all the movements of all things originate from the propagation of the lion.

Space mechanics can explain all the physical phenomena in space. For example, general relativity, quantum entanglement, antimatter**, multi-level nuclear energy, the nature of dark matter, gravitational redshift, the homeostatic structure of the universe, antigravity, the feasibility of inertial flight, the characteristics of cosmic celestial bodies, the lifetime of black holes, the universe is large**, the phantom of the double star, the principle of light difference, the nature of light, the error of gravitation, multidimensional space. In the future, space mechanics can directly calculate the properties of materials to create super-strong materials and high-temperature materials.

With the inexhaustible cold nuclear fusion energy, we will no longer exploit underground resources, and we will still have a blue sky and clear water.

Not all quantum science can explain it, so what does quantum entanglement mean?

Quantum entanglement is only one side, and perhaps there is another side that has not yet been discovered. produces the same result and ignores the distance, then a with a telescope**b, they have the same quantum entanglement, do they see each other? What time did you see each other?

If A is B, are you looking at yourself like a mirror? So is the mirror a spatial conductor of compressed distances?

In my opinion, the Buddhist theory of karma and the Taoist theory of bigu and qi are two absolutely scientific theories that seem ridiculous to most people.

Let's start with karma.

When it comes to karma, many people will think that it is a kind of superstitious propaganda, and they will also give examples to refute that so-and-so is usually overbearing and has lived for more than 90 years; Someone had a very good heart and died before the age of fifty.

In fact, this is a misunderstanding of the theory of karma, which only sees the superficial phenomena and pulls together the phenomena that have no causal connection in the first place, while the real causal relationship is ignored.

The theory of cause and effect is complex. If it is explained simply, it can be summarized in two sentences, one is that any effect must have a cause, and any cause must lead to an effect; In another sentence, from cause to effect, there must be sufficient fate, otherwise cause will not produce fruit.

In fact, when we look beyond the phenomena and sort out the root links behind the phenomena, we will find that the theory of causal correspondence is completely correct.

Let's talk about Bigu food.

As soon as ordinary people hear about Bigu food, they will take it for granted that they don't eat anything and are hungry for many days, which must be a lie.

In fact, the Taoist Bigu Eating Qi is a form of cultivation. When cultivating, you need to maintain a certain state of meditation, at this time, the breath is in an extremely weak state, and the consumption of body energy is very small. Low energy consumption and no hunger.

At the same time, by controlling breathing, the original nutrients in the human body are also constantly transformed into new energy, and the consumed energy is slowly replenished to maintain a balanced state. In this particular state, it is possible to insist on "skipping meals" for a certain period of time. However, cultivators also need to replenish their water consumption by drinking water or eating fruits.

Therefore, there is nothing particularly mysterious about Bigu food gas, it is scientific. It's just that ordinary people don't understand.

Those who believe in science end up in theology.

The more knowledge you have, the more you can feel the insignificance of your own human beings.

The same two quilts, one for hot water and one for cold water, are put in the refrigerator at the same time, and the hot water freezes first. It seems absurd, but it is true, but there is no accepted correct explanation for it.

The Five Elements Doctrine is regarded by many people as feudal superstition, but in fact, it is a comprehensive summary and development embodiment of the Yin and Yang Theory, the Essence Theory, the dialectic, the movement and other ideological concepts. The true meaning of water, wood, fire, earth, and metal refers to the five common operating characteristics of things, and their mutual restraint relationship is an abstraction of the rules of survival of individual things.

Rational explanation. It is only because the Five Elements Theory is a relatively dialectical theory, highly comprehensive and generalized, without standard measurements, difficult to understand and easy to use wrong, and is not generally accepted by people. However, the Five Elements Theory has a solid theoretical foundation and long-term and large-scale practical tests, and is likely to have multi-directional and multi-purpose theoretical research prospects, especially in the traditional Chinese medicine industry, which shows its theoretical scientificity.

Some people may say that the content of the Five Elements Theory is too concise and rigid, and lacks accurate standard exposition and scientific method research and utilization. This may be the problem and direction that needs to be solved in the development of this theoretical discipline.

I support Albert Einstein and don't believe in some of the theories in quantum mechanics, such as ultra-distance quantum entanglement, uncertainty, etc

A considerable number of well-known cases in game theory meet the requirements of the subject, and the most famous one is listed below.

The Prisoner's Dilemma. The two co-suspects were arrested and interrogated separately. If they plead guilty at the same time, they will each be sentenced to eight years in prison. If they do not confess, they will be sentenced to one year each. Only one confessed and was released for meritorious service, while the other was imprisoned for 10 years.

The result of the rational game was that both men pleaded guilty and were imprisoned for a total of 16 years, achieving the result of theoretically the greatest total loss for the two. Interestingly, this is precisely the most rational game outcome.

No matter what the accomplice chooses, the best choice for each suspect is to confess: if the accomplice denies and confesses himself, he will be released directly, and if he does not confess, he will be sentenced to one year, and it is better to confess than not to confess; If an accomplice confesses and confesses himself, he will be sentenced to eight years, and if he does not confess, he will be sentenced to ten years, and it is still better to confess than not to confess.

In fact, this dilemma can also be applied to the traveler's dilemma, the problem of counterfeiting in reality, social climate, and many other aspects.

Why is the human nose protruding? - Because the protruding nose can be seen by the eye, thus helping the person to establish a sense of space.

In VR technology experiments, there has always been a problem of spatial vertigo. A study by Pudu University in the United States found that as long as a virtual nose is added to the VR scene, the phenomenon of vertigo will be reduced.

The researchers tested 41 participants in a variety of virtual scenarios, some with virtual noses and some without. It was found that people with noses were able to stay awake for longer.

Including IQ, personality, feeling well-being, beliefs, political leanings, sexual orientation, etc., the differences between people are largely due to genetic differences.

The shared family environment created by parents has little impact on children's acquired growth.

The story of Achilles and the tortoise. It is said that Achilles, who is quick and fast, can run faster than anyone else, but he can never catch up with a king.

Going faster and faster, time rewind happens!

Sometimes it can be avoided.

What are some scientific theories that have been proven plausible but are ridiculous?

It is said that if you open your legs and take care of your mouth, you can** In fact, it is very unscientific.

The influence of parents on their children's upbringing on children is often exaggerated, and from the perspective of psychological research, the greatest impact on children is usually genes (including the interaction between genes and the environment, because genes come first, so this part is counted as genes), followed by the non-shared environment (parents can also provide non-shared environments for their children), the use of the shared environment is small, but it is still necessary to provide children with a good non-shared educational environment (parenting). ”