Compare the performance differences between the two CPUs

To be honest, your 2 CPUs are very poor,L2 is much more important than L1,Especially in game performance,In addition, Xeon and Celeron are not a grade of things at all,Don't worry about parameters,Xeon U's overclocking performance is very strong,But**The gap above is very big,Look at yourself,Performance is definitely 2 to 1 stronger,

Xeon is used as a CPU for servers, and strives to ensure stability.

In view of the architecture of the Xeon processor and the data transfer speed required between the server CPU and the memory is not very high, the L1 cache is relatively small, but this does not affect it.

The two CPUs have different uses and are not comparable.

If it's a CPU of the same era, choose Xeon.

If Celeron's technology is more advanced than Xeon, then choose Celeron and believe in technology.

L2 cache is more useful than L1 at high computations, and L1 is more important than L2 at low computations.

Who will give me a comparison of how far the performance of the following two CPUs differs? E6750 T6400 (Notebook) I want to give a comparison to see how big the performance difference is. Hello, let's not talk about a desktop computer and a notebook.

Don't think about it, Xeon must be much higher in the game,,LZ may not know,Xeon (Xeon) is IntelIntel,The series launched for servers.。。 It's much better than your home low-end Celeron...

The entanglement in the parameters is better than the use and **, no matter how it is compared, Xiaoqiang is better than Xiaoyang!

Needless to say, the strongest is stronger.

The SNB processor is still made at 32nm

In the case of the same architecture, (i.e., Intel vs. Intel in the same series, AMD vs. AMD in the same series).

CPU performance first depends on the number of cores, then the main frequency and L2 cache, and then the three slowdowns.

i7 2630qm, although the default frequency is low, but it uses four cores and eight threads, and supports turbo frequency, the performance is extremely strong, it is the current Intel high-end processor, and the performance is stronger than the previous generation i7 740qm

The i5 2410M is dual-core and four-threaded, supporting turbo frequency to, and due to the architectural advantages, the performance is slightly better than the i5 480M

As for the i3 390M, it is also dual-core and four-threaded, and since it does not support turbo frequency, the performance is the same as i5 450M, which has the same main frequency after turbo frequency, but it is not as high as i5 480M and i5 2410M.

As for AMD, it is the desktop processor and some high-end mobile processors that do not lock the frequency, although the main frequency is very high, but the architecture is quite different, so even if the main frequency is much higher, the performance is far inferior to the positioning of Intel products. Therefore, AMD mainly adopts the strategy of Tianji horse racing, with 3 cores to play dual cores and 6 cores to play 4 cores, in order to wait for the new architecture of the CPU to go public.

i7-2630qm is used for notebooks In order to dissipate heat and save power, it will naturally reduce the frequency, but the technology of i7 is stronger than i5 Some functions are not available in i5 Multitasking i7 is definitely better than i5 So whether it is good or not depends on the main frequency.

AMD is also good, the cost performance is higher than Intel, and the black box version is not locked and doubled, which is very good for DIY people, but there is no difference between you and lock the frequency doubling Core + Core 2 + Core I series have 65nm, 45nm, and 32nm.

The i5 is dual-core four-threaded, and the i7 is four-core eight-threaded. However, the i7-2630QM is a dual-core, four-threaded notebook CPU. With hyper-threading technology, it is equivalent to 50% more computing power per core. Then the more cores, the higher the computing power.

Big brother i7 is good for quad-core The core is 32 nanometers.