What do you think of the phrase a woman is virtuous if she is not talented ?

I think"A woman's lack of talent is virtue"This statement is incorrect. Because in today's society, girls who are not talented will be derailed from this society. Now not only boys can earn money to support their families, but girls can also earn money to support their families. There are also cases where girls earn more than boys.

If the current girl is not talented, then she will lose a lot of the fun in her current life. For example, if you don't go to school, you won't be able to meet a lot of friends, you can only stay in your own small room every day, and you will lose a lot of fun in your life. <>

And when a girl chooses to go to school, her heart will be enriched and she will be more confident. When she learns some skills, she can solve problems on her own without relying on anyone's help. We also know that in today's society, people think about their own interests first before choosing whether to help others.

In order for us not to look at other people's faces, we also need to be talented.

When a person is talented, she can use her own ability to earn money, and she does not have to rely on boys to meet her needs. We don't have to ask others for what we want, we can buy what we want at will. A talented girl will be more temperamental than a girl without talent, and it will be easier to find a boy she likes.

After all, only when you are good enough can you find a guy who matches you. If you don't have talent, you can only find a random boy to spend the rest of your life.

A talented girl will have more choices than a girl who is not talented. Her life will be more fulfilling and meaningful in the future. Therefore, girls still need to be talented in today's society.

I strongly disagree with this statement. The traditional thinking is that women should be married and raised at home and be a "full-time housewife", but that is a thing of the past after all. Women in the new era must not only pursue "talented", but also surpass themselves at all times, and even surpass some men who look down on women.

Although women in ancient times said that "the door is not out, and the second door is not out", they also have their own talents, and some are even proficient in piano, chess, calligraphy and painting. Their fate is to obey their husbands and teach their children all their lives, but the talents they master can accompany them in the future, so that life will not be too monotonous.

And in modern times, there are more and more strong women in various fields. Most of them have been excellent since they were students, and then they are also very enterprising in their careers, so even if there are varying degrees of discrimination against women in the workplace, they still do not give up their careers. <>

In fact, they could have put down their careers, then get married, have children, and concentrate on being full-time wives, but they didn't do it, because they didn't take "women's lack of talent is virtue" as their shield to escape reality, and they knew how important it was for women in the new era to achieve economic independence.

Getting married and having children seems to be a fate that all women can't escape, but it doesn't necessarily mean how happy everyone's married life is, and one of the biggest advantages of being financially independent is that we don't have to look at anyone's face, we can buy what we like at any time without consulting with others, and we can even be very confident when we quarrel.

The premise of economic independence is undoubtedly "talented", and only when a person is good enough can it be possible to gain sufficient economic strength.

In any era, it is always excellent people who will be favored by others, so how can it be said that "a woman is virtuous if she is not talented"?

I don't think this point of view is right, it's hard to hear, and I think people with this point of view may still be a little feudal. Since ancient times, how many heroines have made amazing achievements in different fields, how can it be said that women are virtuous if they are not talented?

This view has been handed down for a long time, when men were superior to women, and it was a patriarchal era, and women were relatively much lower than men.

Women generally have no opportunity to learn knowledge, even if they read books, most of them can only read books that must abide by women's morals, such as the three from the four virtues, and there may be rich people who can ask Mr. private school to teach, but what about women from poor families? can only learn to be a female celebrity, do farm work, and then get married when you reach the right age.

Is it really a talented woman who is liked? In fact, not really, isn't Li Qingzhao a good example? She attaches equal importance to her talent and beauty, and is loved by many people. Talented people are sought after by people after all. Who doesn't love talented people?

For now, women can hold up half the sky. There is nothing that a man can do that a woman cannot do. Sometimes, women can even take advantage of the advantages that men do not have, and better complete the corresponding tasks.

This view reflects the fact that the status of women is lower than that of men. In China, the difference between the status of men and women in most places is not large, but in a few poor areas, women are the economic ** of the family, a lot of hard work, heavy work or women to do, in addition to these, the meaning of their existence, probably just a tool for reproduction.

Abroad, the situation may be more serious.

Of course, these are my personal opinions, originally everyone looks at the problem from a different angle, and the ideas are different, there is no right or wrong, the position is different, there is nothing to argue, what do you think?

I think this statement is very inappropriate, and it is obviously not suitable for this era. Perhaps, people used to think that "women are virtuous if they are not talented", but today's society is no longer the society it used to be, in addition to people's thinking is not so feudal, there are more inclusive ideas.

"Women are not talented" in ancient times refers to women who do not know some big truths or calligraphy, they are diligent and thrifty, kind but dull. The stupid thing is that they don't understand knowledge and reason, and the dull thing is that they are also "lowly" about their own positioning, just like the discrimination against women in that society. At that time, the man was the only pillar of the family, "the male is outside, the female is inside" is a very common family model, the man is responsible for working outside to support the family, and the woman is born with little strength, can only spin at home to watch the children, do a good job of housework at home, this is the responsibility and obligation of the woman.

In fact, there is another kind of positioning of women in the past, which is "a tool for inheritance", and reproduction is a major task of human beings, and women play such a role. <>

In addition, women are not as strong as men by nature, in the agrarian society at that time, women naturally had a lower status at home, and they will marry after adulthood, and they must serve the men around them well after marrying. For a "talentless" woman, she will not have her own thoughts, because of the limited ideas they accept, including the exposure from childhood, the mission of women is to "teach each other husband and children". Although women may seem dull, this is their "shrewdness" in running their homes.

However, this is no longer the case, and a new generation of women is entitled to an education on an equal footing with men. What's more, it is no longer an "agrarian" society, and this society lacks not only a large number of labor, but a thoughtful and innovative soul, and a valuable soul has nothing to do with gender. Now that "husband and child" is no longer a woman's label, there is no longer a clear boundary between the items of sharing inside and outside the family.

This is the elevation of women's status, human nature is free, and "talentless and virtuous" is no longer a narrow requirement for women. In fact, a person without talent cannot be "virtuous", because knowledge is a prerequisite for the cultivation of "morality". To sum up, I think that "a woman is virtuous if she is not talented" is a fallacy.

In the past, women rarely went to read and write, and people always said: women are virtuous if they are not talented. First, if the mother's family cultivates her to be very talented, it needs to cost the mother's family a lot of money, then after she marries into the mother-in-law's family, she becomes a member of the mother-in-law's family, and the mother's parents think that they have made a loss-making business.

And the in-laws, when marrying a daughter-in-law, will also require the woman to be talentless, because the talentless woman has no opinion, so the in-law and the husband will listen to whatever they say, such a woman is well-behaved and obedient, is a firm supporter of feudal etiquette, and always sacrifices herself to achieve a man.

But today's women have received a good education since childhood, they work hard in their careers, and have made many achievements that are not inferior to men, whether in the workplace or in the family, they also have a high status.

So now there are still some machismo will say that "women are not talented is virtue", this part of the men has limited ability, but the temper is very big, they always think that this society is too cruel, their limited opportunities to make money have been robbed by women a lot, the competition is becoming more and more fierce, he earns less and less, and even many people are not as much as women earn, have to make him hate to think: women are not talented is virtue.

And the economic base determines the superstructure, and if you don't have the ability to make money, you will naturally be looked down upon, and it will be difficult for some people to find a wife. Because of their abilities, they are no longer worthy of today's talented women. So he thinks it's because women are so talented now that he becomes a single dog.

And some married men's wives are also earning money to support their families, the status of husband and wife has long been equal, and women no longer have to obey men, which makes some men very unaccustomed to it, and they have always regarded women as men's subordinates. Therefore, they will also emphasize that a woman's lack of talent is virtue.

But now, men who still want to sacrifice women to gain happiness, please wake up your heads, either you change your ideology, or you can only travel to the Qing Dynasty!