Is it true that China s GDP income ranks third in the world? Is it true that our people s income ran

1.Almaty is not for sure, as for Astana. Here's a comparison in terms of foreign trade, the difference is huge, so neither is Astana.

Urummu has achieved a total import and export volume of 100 million US dollars in foreign trade every year;

Astana's total external value in 1997 was $22.6 million;

2.Islamabad is one of the youngest capitals in the world, with a current population of only 1 million, and Urumqi has 2.33 million, which should not be as good as Urumqi.

Other cities are either too far away or underdeveloped.

Therefore, the nearest are the Indian capitals New Delhi, Xi'an, Chengdu, Baotou and Ordos.

Please take a look at the figure below: Supplement: New Delhi is the political and economic center of India, and India is the second largest developing country in the world after China.

I just checked it and found that the GDP of Baotou, Ordos and Urumqi is about the same:

Baotou: In 2009, Baotou's GDP reached 216 billion yuan, the per capita GDP exceeded 12,000 US dollars, and the per capita disposable income of urban residents was 23,089 yuan.

Ordos: In 2006, the city's GDP reached 80 billion yuan, with an average annual growth rate. GDP per capita is $6,600. The per capita disposable income of urban residents in the city reached 13,002 yuan, and the per capita net income of farmers and herdsmen in the city reached 5,308 yuan.

Urumqi: In 2008, the national economy maintained steady and rapid growth, and the total economic output jumped above the 100 billion yuan mark. The gross domestic product (GDP) of Dijingbi District was 102 billion yuan.

In 2008, the per capita disposable income of urban residents was 12,328 yuan, and the per capita net income of farmers and herdsmen exceeded 6,000 yuan, reaching 6,116 yuan.

From the above, it can be seen that although the years are different, Baotou seems to have a greater economic level than Urumqi, so in the end the nearest Ying Lunian should be... Turban!

And then add the uproar:

In recent years, Kazakhstan has maintained rapid economic growth, with a growth rate of nearly 10 percentage points every year, and a per capita GDP of more than 4,000 US dollars (Global Network).

So for Almaty, I have reservations!

At present, Urumqi has gradually gained the upper hand in the competition for the largest city in Central Asia. In terms of the size of the urban area, the population is comparable to that of "Tashkent". In terms of the number of high-rise buildings, the vitality of the city, and especially the GDP, Urumqi is far ahead of Tashkent.

2008: Tashkent's GDP was about 33.1 billion yuan, while Urumqi's GDP reached 102 billion yuan in the same period, more than three times that of Tashkent. The population of Tashkent is only about 2 million, and 4.45 million refers to the population of Tashkent Oblast.

At present, Tashkent far exceeds that of Urumqi, that is, its three subway lines.

So Tashkent is not!