-
The direct stationing of troops in Japan is the best measure. We haven't withdrawn yet.
-
1. Because Europe was busy with World War I, it had no time to look eastward, and its economic invasion of China was somewhat reduced, and it was in a state of contraction as a whole. Because the United States was not affected by the war, its investment in China grew rapidly. Taking advantage of the shrinkage of the European powers, Japan attempted to annex China on its own and invaded economically on a large scale.
2. Economically, China's national capitalist economy has been given a short opportunity for development, and the national capitalist economy has developed rapidly during this period, but its strength is still weak. Objectively, it has also enabled China to establish a number of modern industries and promote China's modernization. Politically, China's semi-colonization has deepened, and the people's movement to save the country and survive has become even stronger.
The United States and Japan have always adopted an attitude of economic aggression toward China. Since the Meiji Restoration, Japan has tried to expand its living space, so it is one of the necessary means in the period of economic aggression. Among them, the "Twenty-One Articles" are the most famous.
The United States, on the other hand, has always advocated "open doors." The reason for this is that the United States has failed to catch up with the frenzy of the great powers to carve up China, but it is like a piece of the pie. At the same time, it is also aimed at squeezing Japan's power on the Asian continent as much as possible.
Therefore, during World War I, both countries used the export of capital as a means to try to seize the Chinese market, in order to achieve indirect domination. Japan focused on using force to deter warlords from submitting to his rule, with the three eastern provinces being a case in point. The United States, on the other hand, is trying to control China's economy with its strong economic power, so as to achieve its goal of indirectly dominating China.
The European countries, which were busy with the war in World War I, relaxed their economic aggression against China, causing them to lose the advantages they had established in China in the early stage. It was replaced by the United States and Japan.
As for the impact, of course, it is that China's national capitalism cannot develop and hinders China's modernization. At the same time, it also makes China's "two halves" characteristics more prominent. In particular, the "21 Articles" basically betrayed China's sovereignty.
-
Answer]: B This question examines the tactics adopted by Japanese imperialism against the people after the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in Chong Bingzhou entered the stalemate stage.
After the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression entered the phase of stalemate, Japan changed its strategic policy of "quick war and quick solution" and prepared to deal with a long-term war of dispersion. With regard to the people, we should adopt the policy of giving priority to political inducement and supplementing military attacks with military attacks.
-
After the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression entered the stalemate stage, the policy adopted by Japanese imperialism towards the Kuomintang ** was () aMilitary strikes are the mainstay, supplemented by political inducements.
b.It is mainly based on political inducements, supplemented by military strikes.
c.Military strikes and political inducements are equally important.
d.Fight quickly and conquer by force.
Correct answer: and travel B
First, the outcome of Huawei's battle has been decided, and the impact of this battle on Huawei is comprehensive, second, it may lead to Huawei's transformation, and third, of course, this can also expand its popularity, and this battle can also attract the attention of the public.
1.scale, belligerent countries, troop strength;
2.** Equipment, aircraft, tanks, aircraft carriers, submarines are massively used; >>>More
Policy, of course.
Strategy: a course of action and methods of struggle developed in accordance with the development of the situation. >>>More
The GMAT test is 16 days apart from World War II and World War I, and candidates can only take it eight times in their lifetime, so don't waste the number of times you take the test with the mentality of giving it a try. >>>More
Purely military point of view:
The defense was pretty much the same: trenches, machine guns, barbed wire and reinforced concrete fortifications. >>>More