Why is Santana popular and how is Santana?

It feels good to drive a Santana, because I think this model is also a relatively old model in China, it is cost-effective to drive, and the comfort is also better, well, it feels good to drive, the fuel consumption is not large, and it is also relatively environmentally friendly.

Personally, I prefer the Poussin car square head looks generous, and its long body looks particularly mature and stable, the acceleration is also very fast, the rear space is not small, the seat of three people is not crowded at all, the comfort is also good, the only drawback is that the sound insulation effect is not very good, as long as the car is a fire in some small plastics will collide very seriously, and there is too hard to run high speed with air conditioning!

I just want to say those people, say that the Poussin car is not good or picky people, to explain a point, do not understand the car at all, in fact, the Poussin car as long as the display screen looks on the grade, the current car is a new version of the interior, which other can be compared with Poussan, I will say a little let everyone hear, the current car seat cushion will sink for a long time, but the Poussin car will never be like this, what airbags does the current car have, is it really safe??? Safety and unsafety are still reflected in driving skills, friends, understand?

Santana is suitable for ordinary families to drive, if there are no too high requirements, it feels good to drive, comfortable, and the car performance is also good.

The suspension is moderately soft, scoring 70 points between the old GL8 and the Japanese model. The front and rear left and right views are large, especially the rear window, and many cars are almost furnished. The longitudinal engine is flexible in cornering, and there is no car to compare.

7,500 km of maintenance, in a class of its own. The biggest difference is that the car with Chinese characteristics was not intended to be eliminated when it was introduced, and it was polished for 30 years to continuously improve the problems found, so as long as the oil and tires were changed and water added. Disadvantages: poor sound insulation and high road noise.

I think Santana is still very good to drive, first of all, it is relatively common in our real life, and it is a very early model, and the comfort and safety quality are very good in all aspects.

30 years of reform and opening up classic cars, the feelings of the post-80s! The quality is solid, durable and resistant, and the interior is classic and comfortable! The ground is solid, the speed is steady, the hydraulic power is flexible and the direction is accurate, and the driving feeling is relaxed and comfortable!

It's not like the soulless car of the so-called new Santana! The steering wheel of the new Santana is too sensitive as a nervous one, and driving gives you a nervous tense feeling, and it is so tiring to drive! A generation of classics is not in vain!

Good car, easy to drive!

2016 model, manual comfort, landing. It's a bit exaggerated to turn on the air conditioner. Turn on the air conditioner in the summer, I am in the south, the driving style is not violent, the power is required to speed up the fuel consumption of 9 to 10, in the north when the air conditioning is rarely turned on in the summer, and the fuel consumption of gentle driving is below 6.

In summary, if you don't mind shaking this car, you can also start, after all, those who buy Volkswagen have their own beliefs, the power is enough, I like this kind of car, it gives you power when you want power, and you surprise you when you want to save fuel. I drive less cars, if I choose again, I won't choose Santana, I will definitely consider Lingdu CC, I can buy a better one as much as possible, and I won't regret it in the future.

Santana has a large space, good performance, good air conditioning, fast speed, high chassis, easy maintenance, and is very good to drive.

I don't think it's any different to drive a Santana, it's just a means of transportation, I'm not a person who cares a lot about other people's opinions, maybe they think my car is ridiculous.

This model is generally good, for domestic cars, he has a long history, and then the comfort is relatively high, it is more comfortable to drive, and the cost performance is also good, and the safety is also good.

It feels better than Elantra Yuedong, fuel-efficient, good chassis, not bumpy, Yuedong has been flying over the manhole cover railway, 100 kilometers of fuel consumption of six fuel, and I want to drip, that is, it sometimes takes two or three times to open the trunk by remote control, in short, the car is good, and the workmanship is better than that of Korean cars.

Santana's words, it's okay to drive it yourself, the key is that others will think that your method is too special and low, especially bad.

It's not very good to drive a Santana, because now the general driving school uses the Volkswagen Santana, which has a very old-fashioned appearance and a manual transmission.

The old Poussin who drove a fourth-speed carburetor steering wheel without a booster accelerates quickly.

In fact, this car is more suitable for driving when learning to drive, because the appearance of this car is not particularly good-looking, and there is no face when you drive it.

This kind of car is more suitable for novices to drive, because I think his performance and all aspects are average, and it is quite good to drive when I first learn to drive.

Good car, never lagging behind, 2000, 3000, Zhijun are basically eliminated, but Poussin still exists.

The return rate on the road is high, and the friends around him laugh at him. There are many small problems, if you don't clean it up, you can't stand it, clean it up, and you have to start a big project with a little problem. The comfort is better than most cars in its class.

<> dad has always felt that he is a person who knows a lot about vehicles. Not long ago, my dad bought a Santana. For Volkswagen's cars, my dad has always liked them, and for a car with a good reputation like Santana, my dad can't put it down.

One day, what do you think of Santana's car? After listening to my evaluation, my father had nothing to say.

In China's vehicle market, Santana should be a relatively old car, but it is definitely a very classic, although it has also experienced discontinuation halfway, but, after the new Santana is re-listed, it has still won the love of many people, just last year's sales reached nearly 300,000 units, and although it is an entry-level car, but the configuration is definitely very complete.

The car has six airbags, a body stabilization system, cruise control, anti-pinch hands in the windows, electronic power steering, and a welcome pedal. It's really unexpected, and in terms of power, it is with two engines, and the fuel consumption is very affordable. In all respects, although Santana is not too prominent, it is relatively good.

In the field of joint venture cars, Santana's comprehensive strength is definitely very strong, and Santana has always taken the route of being close to the people and practical. So it makes sense to have good sales. It was wise for Dad to be able to choose Santana.

After listening to my evaluation, my father was speechless. Dad didn't expect my evaluation to be so professional.

See also the entry for "George Santayana". George. George Santyanna (1863, 1952) was an advocate of critical realism in the United States.

Originally from Spain, he moved to the United States as a child, where he studied at Harvard University, where he received his Ph.D., where he taught. He returned to Europe and lived in Spain, England, France and Italy, before dying in Rome in 1952. In addition to the Critical Realism (1920), which he co-authored, his major philosophical works include Skepticism and Animal Belief (1923) and The Field of Being (1927-1940).

Santayana's philosophical thought proceeds from skepticism, advocating the suspicion of everything, even Descartes' "I think". But he argues that there are only two things that cannot be questioned, and that is the "direct material" (perceptual material) and the "essence" (abstract concept or form) in human perception. He gave an example:

People look up at the crescent moon, some see it as a "heavenly fire", some see it as a "fairy", some see it as a "satellite", and so on. Although each person sees it differently, they are both composed of concrete direct materials and abstract essences (such as the forms of heavenly fire, fairies, satellites, etc.), and they are both clear and unquestionable. From there, he opposed the "direct presentation theory" of the new realism.

He asserts that the content of knowledge and the object of knowledge are not the same thing as the new realists believe, and the process of knowing is not the process of "direct presentation" of external objects directly into the human brain, but the process of knowing the object through the mediation of "essence" (abstract concept), and due to the distortion of mediation, human knowledge is not only likely to produce errors, but also impossible to obtain the truth of the object, thus falling into agnosticism.