Who understands the display of the F22 fighter

You ask the US Department of Defense Equipment.

He's talking about games, and he's right.

What nonsense is the upstairs person talking about.

Running over to fight the artillery, as long as you enter the close range of numerical superiority can be revealed, even the third-generation fighter is also very promising to tie with the advantage of 3:1. For the F-22, the riskiest grappling is one that must be avoided, although the odds are high when the numbers are not too large.

In addition, the conditions for launching air-to-air missiles at close range are now too relaxed, and even if there are infrared suppression measures, it is still more dangerous to get close. At least much more dangerous than radar distance.

The question is how to maintain a numerical advantage in the past, after all, the aircraft that has not been able to compete with the F-22 in terms of distance, and the positioning is almost impossible. If a few F-22s can make the entire region abandon air defense, then the purpose has been achieved. If this is done, it is estimated that it will not be long before the early warning radar station and the front-line airfield will be in ruins.

In other words, the F-22 itself is the best Faraday cage, because there must be a good conductor outside the internal equipment, which just shields all EMP, not to mention that the ** EMP can only be produced by a nuclear explosion, and the EMP does not distinguish between friend and foe.

The exchange ratio should admit that there is no fighter compared to the F22, the advantage of the F22 is all-round, the electronic advantage is great, the aerodynamic shape is on the upper side, but the engine is excellent, the total maneuverability, range, and acceleration are all over the current aircraft.

It should also be admitted that without that country's air command, the dispatch system is superior to that of the US military, and the US military's air early warning, electronic warfare, dispatch, and command capabilities are also at the top level in the world.

Therefore, it can only rely on the exchange ratio, fight with a large number of aircraft, according to the deduction, the exchange ratio of the Su-27 and the like is about 10:1, and the J-8, J-7 and the like are about 20:1, taking into account the **, the cost of training pilots, you should try to consume the F-8 with aircraft like J7, J22

China has tactics against F22.

High-precision ** like F22 has very high requirements for logistics maintenance, as if the stealth paint has to be repainted once after flying. We can use road-based missiles or special operations teams to attack nearby US airfields and make the F22 have no return. The airfield was destroyed, and the only option was to take off and land on the highway.

But without the costly maintenance equipment, the F22 becomes a one-off of hundreds of millions of dollars**.

However, the maintenance of China's SU30 is very simple, and the maintenance requirements of logistics are not so harsh. Soon after the highway takes off and lands, it will be able to take to the air again for combat.

This set of tactics is still very economical and practical. China's current missiles can cover any U.S. airfield. It would be very unwise to use an airplane to fight the F22, and the advanced fighter that can deal with the F22 will not be worth the loss economically.

Well, there are two drawbacks.

The first is that the cost is too high.

The second is that the amount of equipment is too small.

It is impossible to shoot down the F22 without advanced fighters.

China currently does not have the ability to shoot down the F22 and cannot do anything.

If you want to take J8, J7 or even J10 or something like that, they won't pee on you, and you will leave after completing the set task, and you can't see it or hit it.

The F-22 is too expensive to build, and this is its biggest drawback. It is possible to use several J-10 or J-11 to cooperate with AWACS aircraft to carry out encirclement and suppression, and the losses of the United States are definitely greater than ours.

Don't think about shooting down the F22A without an advanced fighter. As the most advanced fighter at present, the F22A can only be said to be a little more expensive. If you have to name a bunch of shortcomings of the F22A, then all the other fighters are rubbish.

You can use some more earthy methods, such as spraying metal powder at the height of the best combat performance of F22, so that when it is attached to F22, its radar stealth is easy to hit small, or use pulse **, because the material of F22 uses efficient radar wave absorbing materials, and it also has high absorption capacity for high-energy electromagnetic waves, so that pulse ** is quite effective for it, and enough to destroy its computer system, a blow is enough to make it fall, the disadvantage is that the destructive power of pulse ** is relatively large, There is also a large number of anti-air balloons in the airspace to monitor, so as to carry out a locking attack, or in the airplane to aircraft in the air battle, we turn off the radar, because the F22 uses the reverse tracking technology of radar waves, we can first make it lose the target and hide in the high altitude, because of its extremely fast speed, in the process of pursuing our fighters, we can use the "Cobra" maneuver, or suddenly pull up and other actions to let the F22 to our fighters take the opportunity to lock and attack with thermal induction missiles.

Such an aircraft costs too much, whether it is manufactured or maintained, and when fighting a local war, he has an absolute advantage. But when a large-scale war occurs, in the middle and late stages of the war, it is basically unaffordable, and it costs a lot of money to fight a war, and it is so expensive for the United States to fight a small country like Iraq, and he cannot afford to fight a country like China, in short, it is too expensive.

Fires an EMP bomb. f22 directly becomes f86.

All planes landed with surface-to-air missiles.

This trick makes the S400 and F-22 unable to dodge.

China does not have the S400, only the S300 is barely used, but the number is too small, and the high-power radar on the ground finds it easy.

His speed and ceiling are not very exaggerated.

You can use ballistic missiles to attack the airfield where the F-22 is parked, and at present, the F-22 of the US military in Asia is deployed in **, and China's ballistic missiles can completely land on any airfield. There will still be F-22s on air patrol or standing on take-off surviving, but the number is very small enough to pose a threat. Of course, the U.S. military can also take off F-22s from airports around the world and fly over with air refueling, but air tankers are not as good as F-22s.

There are three methods, which are ground air defense, ground air defense and ground air defense.

The biggest disadvantage is that ordinary people can't drive.

Expensive, that's the only drawback, and the U.S. only purchased 180 planes.

The plane is too big and the drag is too great, the engine power is small, and the bomb load is small, as long as the other party discovers it and takes off the fighter to intercept it, it will be doomed.

One of the most advanced fighters in the world, but not the most advanced aircraft. Airplanes are a very broad concept.

It has advanced aerodynamic layout, good endurance and stealth ability.

The A-22 system has the characteristics of high reliability, less spare parts, and small air transportation support. Its avionics system is fault-tolerant, allowing the system to automatically reconstruct when a circuit board fails. The electronic system is liquid-cooled, which helps to extend the life of the system.

In addition, during development, avionics systems undergo comprehensive analysis, development testing, and full-scale testing, which are more rigorous and timeless than traditional military standard testing. For example, the number of thermal cycles in the electronic equipment test is 10 times that of the military standard, and the vibration time of high-speed vibration is also 10 times that of the military standard.

Left**: Speed Units section.

Right**: Altitude in feet, the middle of the box is the standard barometric altitude (above sea level), and the lower box is the field height (the height of the airport).

Upper edge**: Heading unit degrees.

AOA: Angle of Attack (Angle of Attack) units.

g: Load. m: Mach number.

Waypoint No. **Bend).

range distance from this waypoint.

thr: throttle unit %

The g in the lower left corner indicates that the landing gear is down, and disappearing indicates that the landing gear is retracted. f stands for flap and has the same meaning.

It's enough to know this, and if you don't understand, please ask.