Regarding the philosophical content, whoever helps translate it, all the parts are sent 30

Human consciousness has a dual nature, one is emotional and the other is rational. Reason plays a primary role in our thinking, and we can also actively use and control reason. Sensibility is more of a subconscious and more connected to other parts of our body besides the brain.

We have emotions, so we are stubborn. Although we have been trying, we can never rule out the influence of sensibility on our judgment, we can easily increase our knowledge from what sensibility guides us to do, we can attribute rational factors to emotional factors, but whether you admit it or not, sensibility has always had a tendency to reject reason. If we can completely abandon our sensibilities and become a purely rational creature, it will certainly be beneficial, but at the same time we will no longer be human.

As living human beings, we must have both positive and negative emotions at the same time. At the same time, the classification of positive and negative emotions is also done by reason, in short, our classification of an emotion depends on our reaction to that emotion. When we do something successfully, we will have great feelings, and happy emotions will sweep away the negative emotions that were previously negative.

But when we are in an emergency, the tension and fear of negativity become necessary. All emotions are a part of who we are, and as long as we can make the most of them, any emotion can act as a stepping stone on our path to success.

Translated by yourself (nonsense, you can also tell), the article is slightly difficult and requires some basic knowledge.

Translated as "philosophy", yes.

In some countries, there is a philosophy that you work when the "boss" is present.

This can be understood as:"Creed Popular Ideas".

It can be translated into the principle of doing things, which is equivalent to the principle

Sorry, I can only do my best to translate for you :

It's, "You're talking about what if you're not in class?

Agree. Just imagine, there will be ** Enya and I still have to play tonight?

No, I'm going to ** will.

If it had been completely free, with ** Hui Enya (although you ignore it), would you stay at home and play cluedo?

No, because it won't do anything and I certainly want to do that.

But why not?

You don't know that there is a ** meeting of Enya, therefore, can not wish to attend. As long as it is not in this election. What they want is to play cluedo and has been free if you are already able to play.

Marta again no longer feels trapped in the well. This question is not defined by the freedom she gives. This is something deeper, and more said last:

I guess there's a bit of a problem here. I don't know if this is what I want to ** would be to play cluedo, but if it was known ** would be wouldn't be want to play cluedo either. Now, you don't know if you play cluedo is indeed what I do or from time to time, there is a concert I want to attend, but I don't know this.

Asking this question is different. After thinking for a while and saying, any additional authorities? The reason for the prohibition of ** will.

They cut off my freedom from the Marta coup.

If not to ban it, hide its existence? I know that the concert doesn't mean much, I just said it, because the organizers are putting up posters to promote it. But I don't know, think of things that they are officially titled as citizens of a country, but the power is to make people know that you can't do it, better, you can imagine, I know today is **going to be the Enya, which is advertised everywhere, even on TV, but very cleverly, I've done everything possible so that you don't have the chain at the beginning, I know it's announced**will, you tell you about the top company, if you say a few words, I'm angry with them instead of asking you for your next birthday party, and so on.

A large part of Kant's work deals with the question "Can we know?" "The answer, if it can be said simple, is the limit of our knowledge to mathematics and science to the natural, empirical world. It is impossible, Kant argues, to expand the field of knowledge supersensible speculative metaphysics.

The reason for these limitations of knowledge, according to Kant, is to take into account the characteristics of the active role in the composition, experience and limitations of bearing in mind the space and time of the field of acquisition of experience.

Phihosopy philosophy, theology, science.

In this regard, I suggest you go to The History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell

It is Russell, a history of Western philosophy.

This book is easy to understand and wonderful, making it a great book for beginners.

Philosophical words? That's philosopy.

It is a creature between heaven and earth, and it is the "heart" of heaven and earth. The reason why the characters can survive is also because of the existence of heaven first, and they use the "heart" of heaven and earth as a guide for their actions. Therefore, if you want to talk about the experience of "heart", it can be summed up in one sentence, which is benevolence.

Therefore, those who talk about the "heart" of heaven and earth do not need to know all about the "physical use of the four virtues" and "the physical use of the unacceptable". So what exactly is this "heart"? In heaven and earth, it is the "heart" of living beings.

And for people, it is a heart of gentleness, love, and profit. My theory is to use love as the subject of the theory, and benevolence as its name.

And the body of the four virtues that cannot be used is not to be known and should be used. "I don't understand this sentence.

Jen said...

It seems to be difficult to translate...