In some theory, Zen actually has something in common with philosophy? Is there anyone who can answer

What they have in common is that they both focus on the nature of the universe and on real existence.

But the approach is completely different. Philosophy relies on language and logic, trusting in the power of reason; Zen relies on intuition and epiphany, trusting in the power of irrationality.

Philosophy creates a real existence through the construction of language, and Zen directly grasps the real existence through the deconstruction of the world constructed by language.

The highest philosophers and Zen scholars have the same understanding of the world, no matter how different the way they grasp it.

As far as I understand it, theology is a myriad of lies told by objective idealists in order to fulfill a lie.

It's morning, sorry for the typo.

I don't think Zen is philosophy.

Zen is a method of practice. Abbreviation for "Dhyana" in Buddhism, a transliteration of the Pali word jhāna. The Sanskrit word is dhyāna.

There are also those who translate it as "forsaken evil" or "jungle of merit". It translates to "meditation" or "meditation". It is a practice method of Buddhism, in which there is a difference between Patriarch Zen and Buddha Zen.

Speech and thinking cultivation is based on the cause of the name, which means that the single-minded thinking and cultivation is the cause and can be fixed, so it is called thinking cultivation. Those who speak quietly are named according to their bodies. Its Zen body, which is silent and has the purpose of deliberation, is called meditation.

Stillness is certainty, consideration is wisdom, and the wisdom is equal"Zena"。That is, Buddhism generally talks about Zen meditation. Ethereal tranquility, abandoning the outer edge (external things) and not being affected by them; Taking the gods back and causing the spirit to look back at itself (not the physical body) is "Zen."

Zen seems to be a way of thinking.

Zen is naturally philosophy, Buddhism is philosophy, and "Buddha" means "enlightened one", which is very different from the "god" in general religion! "Bodhisattva" and "Arhat" also mean "enlightened person......

Zen Buddhism is completely sinicized Buddhism, and it is already very secular and life-like! Practicing in the world, the Buddha scolded the ancestors, talked and laughed freely, eclectic, its dialectics are skillfully used, but there is still some mysticism, but with Confucianism, Taoism is getting closer and closer, Zen is old, Zhuang is simple and mysterious, and the "Analects" is easy and open, the temple has become an open place of practice, and there is an ideological basis for Shaolin monks to protect the country and Anliang.

Yes, Zen is actually a kind of study of human nature and life, which belongs to the category of epistemology in philosophy!

With my superficial understanding, the integration of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism is the great wisdom of life. Read it every day, and you will have a lesson.

Zen and Buddhism are related.

A Buddha is a person who has an epiphany, an enlightenment. Zen means meditation and enlightenment. Shakyamuni Buddha was the master of Buddha Shakyamuni who meditated under the Bodhi tree for several days and nights before he had an epiphany of the thoughts of Buddhism and became enlightened in life. Any religion or non-religion can sit in meditation, which means to meditate.

After the rise of Buddhism, with the changes of time and history, countless Buddhist scholars emerged, and various Buddhist sects emerged, such as: Vinaya, Zen, Tantra, Pure Land Buddhism, ......And the Zen Buddhism you mentioned was founded by Bodhidharma after he came to China from India. Unlike the Pure Land Buddhism, Zen Buddhism is not like the Pure Land Buddhism, where people can increase their consciousness and become a Buddha by chanting Buddha every day. Rather, by meditating and meditating on nothing, you become enlightened in life, and then you become a Buddha.

Zen Buddhism is a Buddhist sect without words, his study and practice are not like we read, the teacher gives you textbooks (Buddhist scriptures), so that you can read Li Bai, Du Fu, and classical Chinese every day, and then learn from them, feel the boundless wisdom of the Buddha. Zen is a sect without written texts or texts.

So I'll help you point out that your question proposition is not right, Zen is a branch of Buddhism, and it is an affiliation. Nowadays, many literati and intellectuals seem to understand Zen but do not understand it, and it is inappropriate to take out Zen alone without fully understanding it.

Zen is a branch of Buddhism, the so-called outside the teaching, Buddhism has a systematic interpretation of the world view and outlook on life, so it is a kind of philosophical thought.

All things come from nothingness and arise from nothingness, but they may not always be empty, and everything is empty. The universe, the world, and human beings all come out of nothing, and even if they will eventually turn into nothingness, they all bloom for a while. So the past may be empty, the future may be empty, but no one dares to say that everything is empty in the present.

People are people in society, completely separated from the whole of society, even if they are not real people, and people are not wood and stone, and it is impossible to truly be completely desireless, thoughtless, and ruthless, so people's love and obsession come from what they see on the outside and think in their hearts. As for the ups and downs of people coming to the world, I think they just don't want their lives to be empty, since the past is also empty, and the future is also empty, then if the present is still empty, will it not be in vain to live a lifetime. The reason why people work hard is that they don't want their lives to be boring and their values to be lost.