How can the general elections in rural areas be fair and just?

It is indeed too difficult to get a standard village cadre leader, why? Hundreds of thousands of villages and townships across the country, instead of leading cadres at or above the county level, have now become an old habit of taking over relations, canvassing for votes, friends, and family members? They all choose people with ulterior motives, want to enjoy everything for themselves, take refuge in the project, use the relationship to carry out activities below before every election, and are all relevant members of the ** department.

Personally, I believe that no matter which one is chosen to take office, there should be the following conditions:

1. After really taking up the duties, do practical things for the people of the whole village, do real and practical things, do not defraud the state's projects, overturn the fields and forests that occupy the farmers, and should give reasonable subsidies, and cannot deceive the people.

2. Now that there has been no meeting at all, and the knowledge of documents, laws and regulations is not studied, the atmosphere should be driven to strengthen learning and progress, and change the conceptual nature of ideology, morality and society.

3. You can't be selfish, only have good relationships with farmers and highlight all these relationships.

4. Accept opinions, listen to the opinions of righteous people, and absorb a lot of experience points.

5. You can't get carried away in front of the masses with a small official stand.

6. It is not possible to use power relations among the villagers, to use people to beat people, to retaliate against others, if there is a problem among the masses, in a contradictory situation, to mediate and deal with it in a timely manner, can not ignore things, only do their own duty room.

7. Especially now that the village cadres and committees have nothing to do in the office, they only look at their mobile phones, they are incapable of doing things, and they do not show up for many things, and they use village members to handle them.

8. This article is more important, the old village book that retired in the past, working long hours and more people with rich knowledge and experience in all aspects of society, should be taught and participated in the guidance, and cannot exclude and oppose these good old cadres, who are clearly old and outdated and retired, not incompetent, and now they need to coexist and cooperate in a common mode and method, so that there is no problem in each village.

It is difficult to achieve fairness and justice in rural general elections, which are mixed with the interests of all parties, and rural governance has a long way to go.

I think that if we want to be fair and just in the general elections in the rural areas, we must send good representatives to supervise the election work, and we must put an end to those cheating images.

If you want to make the election more fair and just, you must publish every ballot transparently, so that you can know who everyone voted for and who has a higher support rate.

First of all, I think the scope of the election should be expanded, and everyone should be given an equal opportunity to compete, and bribery should also be avoided, and strict supervision should be carried out to ensure the fairness and justice of the general election.

If there is a law, it must be followed, violations must be investigated, and law enforcement must be strict.

Half a year, the higher-level party organization sent someone to review, and the villagers commented poorly

The whole process should be monitored, and problems should be corrected immediately.

When the village elections are held, some villagers who are not related to the leaders can be found to conduct elections, so that they can be fair and just. I think that when it comes to elections, you can choose to vote anonymously.

In my opinion, in the general election of the village, the capable should be promoted and the mediocre should be lowered. Only in this way can we be fair and just, and only in this way can the village be governed well.

I think the fairest way is for everyone to vote, and the people who are elected in this way must be popular with the people.

Legal analysis: The suffragers are generally villagers who have reached the age of 18 in their own village. Villagers who have reached the age of 18 have the right to vote and to stand for election, regardless of ethnicity, race, sex, occupation, family background, religious belief, educational level, property status, or period of residence, except for those who have been deprived of their political rights in accordance with the law.

Legal basis: Article 13 of the Organic Law of the People's Republic of China on Villagers' Committees Article 13 Villagers who have reached the age of 18 have the right to vote and to stand for election, regardless of ethnicity, race, gender, occupation, family background, religious belief, education level, property status, or period of residence; However, this excepts are made for persons who have been deprived of their political rights in accordance with the law.

At present, at the national level, the election of rural villagers' committees is only stipulated in the Organic Law of the People's Republic of China on Villagers' Committees, and there is no special rural election law for the time being. However, each locality may issue specific implementation measures in accordance with the Organic Law of Villagers' Committees.

Who decides on the recall of members of the villagers' committee.

It is an offence to constitute a minor injury. Report to the police or have evidence to file a private prosecution.

Article 234 of the Criminal Law: Whoever intentionally harms the body of another person is sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

<> I believe that, first, candidates must register for the election, second, the election committee will strictly examine them, third, after determining the candidates, they must truthfully announce to the candidates the account sinking form of the village foundation and the candidates' instructions and questions, fourth, they should allow the candidates to openly listen to the people's opinions and publicize their own plans for governing the villages, and fifth, they must organize the elected people's plans for governing the villages after the year-end assessment and acceptance before they can continue to govern. But most of the current villagers do not have the brains to supervise the selection of people, lack a sense of justice, but rely on their own selfish interests, factions, and private anger to blindly vote, and it is easy for big words, hypocrisy, and evil forces to take advantage of loopholes.

With regard to general elections, I think it is very difficult to be fair and impartial at any time, including elections in both the East and the West!

Let me tell you a fact: There are nearly 20 aboriginal households in an urban village, with a population of nearly 200 people, and about 100 voters who are qualified to vote. Among the more than 20 households, there are more than 10 households with a large surname, accounting for nearly 70 percent of the valid voters, and the other 30 percent are miscellaneous surnames.

Every time the village chief is elected, Jiangshan basically sits in turns with a certain surname. The other miscellaneous surnames, which account for 30 percent, will never be able to elect a village head, unless a village chief is parachuted. This phenomenon generally does not happen, and the power of 70% of the family should not be underestimated.

This is a real fact, if the people are elected, the village chief is judged by votes, and the other 30% of the people want to be elected as the village head, which is even more difficult than buying a lottery ticket to win the jackpot!

With the above phenomena, who can say that the results of the election are unfair and just? Who's to say that the results of the election are fair and impartial for the 30 percent of the mixed castes? What can be done to do it: to be fair and unbridled?

In the world, there is no perfect person, and there is no perfect thing. No one is perfect, and no one is perfect. Don't be too competitive, don't demand perfection too much, and don't pursue perfect fairness and justice. Be content!

To explain casually, the head of an urban village in a first-tier city is equivalent to the captain of a production team in the mainland, but the salary of the village head may be higher than that of the head of the mainland township. The annual income of the village, the deposit may also be higher than the annual income of a township in the mainland).

A deep respect for your seriousness. Strictly speaking, this electoral process is not serious. Because the distribution of ballots is according to the hair of the people present, and then the ballot papers are collected with the entrustment form, and after the distribution is completed, the staff will count the number of ballots issued and record them for future reference, and seal all the excess ballot papers; Before voting, the staff will open the ballot box on the spot to check whether there is any cheating and publicize it to the public; After the polling is over, the number of ballot papers shall be counted before opening the box, and the number of ballot papers shall not exceed the number of ballot papers issued.

Throughout the election process, a notary is on hand to supervise. The fact that you filled in two ballots without a proxy ballot shows that the ballot papers are not being issued seriously.

Elections in China are not very serious, because we only elect a village representative at the grassroots level, and the village representative then elects the township representative, the township representative elects the district representative, the district representative elects the city representative, and the city representative elects the provincial representative, and ......so onYou don't even know who the final elected representative is! Therefore, many places in the world have held auditions and referendums, so as to meet the true wishes of the majority of people.

One person, one vote, no matter how many ballots are filled in without entrusting the vote, it is not legal, it is pure cheating, and the scrutineers are not in place to supervise: the election results should be shown to be invalid