What are the laws on borrowing and repaying quickly, urgently

Go to the Internet to check the "General Principles of Civil Law" and "Contract Law".

The legal provisions on non-repayment of borrowed money stipulate that if the borrower fails to repay the loan within the time limit, it shall pay a certain amount of overdue interest in accordance with the agreement or the relevant provisions of the state, and bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract, etc., and if the borrower fails to repay the borrowed money, the lender may also file a lawsuit.

Article 676 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China If the borrower fails to return the loan within the agreed time limit, it shall pay overdue interest in accordance with the agreement or the relevant provisions of the state. Article 678 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides that the borrower may apply to the lender for an extension of the loan period before the expiration of the repayment period; If the lender agrees, it can be extended. Article 667 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China The loan contract is a contract in which the borrower borrows money from the lender and returns the loan at maturity and pays interest.

Hello, in this case, you do not have to be legally responsible, because you and your boyfriend are not currently in a husband and wife relationship, and the money you borrowed is a personal debt and has nothing to do with the other party. Your boyfriend pays you back, he is paying his personal debts, and he has nothing to do with you borrowing money. So you're not at fault.

The landlord does not need to bear any legal responsibility for this matter.

1.You are not a borrower;

2.You are not a guarantor;

3.You and your boyfriend are not married (subject to the marriage certificate) and do not need to be jointly and severally liable.

If he wants to sue, let him sue. Hope it can help the landlord.

If the person who owes money leaves an inheritance of more than 200 yuan, it should be repaid, and you can ask his heirs, that is, his wife, children or parents... If you can't get it, you'd better solve it by letting the village cadres mediate, after all, it's not cost......-effective to go to court for 200 yuan

Suggestion: More than 200 yuan, don't ask for it, just participate in the white affairs of the dead, and give a salute.

Hello, the money owed to the debtor can be repaid within the limits of his estate.

Hello, this concerns the issue of the use of legal acts as evidence.

1. If the remittance is made by bank, as long as the remittance voucher is kept, it can be said that the money contained in the IOU has been paid off;

2. It is better if the IOU can be recovered, because it eliminates the possible greed. Although it will eventually lose the case, it will also cause you trouble;

3. If you still feel that the evidence is insufficient, you can let it issue a receipt, or let unrelated friends participate in the testimony, and then you can record it and let it confirm that the money has been received during the call!

The above suggestions are for reference.

Generally speaking, to repay the money, you need to get back the IOU, or write a receipt for receiving the repayment;

However, if you are in two places, you can ask him to send you a letter stating that he wants you to repay the money you borrowed on a certain year, month and day, the amount to be repaid, the repayment period, and the bank account number. Then you transfer the money according to the above account number on schedule, and keep the bank documents;

Of course, it is your right to ask him to pay the money in person and the IOU in the other, and it depends on the creditor whether you agree or not!

It is advisable to negotiate a mutually acceptable approach.

If there is no other evidence, the mere fact that you have remitted money will not prove that it is a return of the debt.

But if the other party still uses the previous IOU to recover the arrears from you, you can claim unjust enrichment for the other party! So don't be afraid that he will blackmail you with an IOU!! But that's a hassle! There will be litigation in the future!

It is still advisable to ask him to send a text message (send you his bank account number and indicate repayment!). And the amount! Or something else that might prove that you paid it back when you sent it!

Remember that it was proved by him, and your unilateral is not legally effective, such as the remittance statement you unilaterally filled, which cannot be proven) so that the text message and remittance voucher can be used as evidence of repayment at that time! Remember to text your phone if it's his usual number! Don't accept the stranger!

And as soon as we met, I quickly asked for the IOU back!

It is best to repay the loan in person, with a third person present to testify, to take back the IOU, and to have the other party provide a written proof that the repayment has been received, with a date and a signature and seal. If possible, a third person can also sign it as proof.

If there is an agreement in the loan contract, it will be agreed. If there is no agreement, it is in accordance with the provisions of the law.

Contract Law of the People's Republic of China (1999).

Article 205 The borrower shall pay interest within the agreed time limit. There is no agreement on the period for the payment of interest.

or where the agreement is not clear, and it is still uncertain in accordance with the provisions of Article 61 of this Law, and the loan period is less than one year, it shall.

When paid together with the return of the loan; If the loan period is more than one year, it shall be paid at the expiration of each year, and the remaining period.

If the period is less than one year, it shall be paid together with the repayment of the loan.

Article 206 The borrower shall return the loan within the agreed time limit. There is no agreement or agreement on the term of the loan.

If the determination is not clear and cannot be determined in accordance with the provisions of Article 61 of this Law, the borrower may return it at any time; Lender.

The borrower can be urged to return within a reasonable period of time.

Note: If there is no interest agreement, it is considered that there is no interest.

Contract Law of the People's Republic of China (1999).

Article 211:Where there is no agreement on the payment of interest in a loan contract between natural persons or the agreement is not clear, it shall be deemed that interest is not paid.

Since your friend was writing about investment, it can only be treated as an investment. But even if it's an investment, your friend, as one of the investors, has the right to ask to see the accounts and the specific expenses. As you said, if the business is not done at all, your friend can withdraw the investment.

If you think it's a fraud, you need to have evidence to prove that the person who asked your friend to invest in the first place had no intention of doing business at all, but deliberately planned to defraud your friend of his money.

Re-file the economic lawsuit and ask for the return of the investment money, because it says the investment.

Establishment of oral investment contracts. The money cannot be claimed in accordance with the loan repayment procedure, and the court will not support the request. It can only be done by investment. It is still possible to request the withdrawal of the investment.

It's just that I think if your friend is an investment business, he should be a small shareholder. The right to participate in business decision-making and account inquiry. There should also be dividends, etc.

Explain to the court the fact that the borrower has not done business and submit relevant evidence. For example, the bank transfer records of the current year and so on, ......It should be useful.

Don't easily involve the underworld, it's best to use legal means, the above two Baiyou's opinions are feasible, you try it, but remember, the court only looks at the evidence!

There's nothing wrong with this IOU. If the creditor gives money directly to your father's boss and does not have your father's account, your father can use this to fight against it, and he once wanted to borrow money, but the other party did not pay your father the money. You can advise the creditor to sue the boss on the grounds of unjust enrichment, i.e. there is no reason to collect the money and demand that he return it.

In addition, if you say that the debtor is willing to agree to change the borrower to the owner of the company, does this debtor refer to your father's boss? If he agrees to change the borrower to the owner of the company, and the creditor, who is the creditor, agrees, then your father can avoid repayment. If it's just the creditor who agrees, and your father's boss doesn't, then it can't be changed.

You can operate this, you are **? It is recommended to entrust a professional lawyer to help you handle it.