Who do you think is more talented, Chamberlain or O Neill?

There is no comparison, except for weight, Chamberlain almost beats the sharks in all other aspects. Whether it's speed, bounce, fitness, reach, or even strength.

7 scoring champions + 11 rebounding kings + 1 assist kings, points + boards + minutes in a single season, so that Russell, who is 5MVP, only gets 3 times, and Russell, who averages boards per game in his career, only gets 4 rebounds, and 2 of them are Chamberlain's failure to enter the league, and 1 is because Chamberlain's season injury is scrapped. And, of course, the history + number of times. Think about what it would be like if this string of numbers were written in the Shark's honor book?

I'm afraid I'm going to surpass Jordan, right?

Don't forget, he's still a player from the '60s, and if he were given the nutrition, equipment, training, and genetics of the '90s, what would his stats look like?

Chamberlain's basketball talent is higher than Omni's, Chamberlain has very good shooting ability, hook skills, and better athletic talent.

Chamberlain's talent is even better, no one can break the record of 100 points in a single game, and the combination of super physical fitness and athleticism. O'Neill is physically fit and not as athletic as Chamberlain.

I think it's O'Neal, because O'Neal has a lot of physical fitness, so to speak, and there's no one under his basket who he can't beat, so I think it's O'Neal.

ChamberlainThe overall strength is stronger. Chamberlain andO'NeillBothThe key mountain legends in NBA history are the most dominant centersAlthough Chamberlain is a more old-fashioned and wise star. But no matter when he is ranked, he has a place in the top 10 superstars of all time.

Oxlade-Chamberlain's talent is the strongest center, especially after O'Neill compares him, you can appreciate his strength better. So if you compare who will be stronger, let's take a look at it together.

First of all, from the duo'sPhysical fitnessCome and see. Both are of the same height, both meters, ChamberlainReachFor the meter, O'Neill for the meter. And because O'Neill's shoulders are wider, Chamberlain further opens up his advantage, O'Neill has an advantage in weight, which is generally 150 kilograms, while Chamberlain is around 130 kilograms.

Followed by from the twoCareerAchievements. O'Neal is averaging career rebounds and assists per game, and Chamberlain is averaging career rebounds and assists per game. O'Neill had one timeMVP, Chamberlain had 4 MVPs.

O'Neill has 2 scoring titles and Chamberlain has 7 scoring titles. Compared with the longevity of O'Neill's career, Chamberlain, who had a short career, won such an honor in only 14 seasons, which is enough to show that his strength is not ordinary.

Finally, from the comparison of the abilities of the two. The two are very dominant in the center position, and Oxlade-Chamberlain's contemporaries are all buggy; O'Neill has bothOlajuwon, Ewing andRobinson。In terms of contemporary dominance, Chamberlain was undoubtedly stronger, and the Chamberlain of O'Neill's time was likely to be stronger than O'Neill.

So I think Chamberlain is better than O'Neill in terms of dominance. To sum up, Chamberlain's overall strength is stronger.

Chamberlain's overall strength was stronger. Lu Qing has a very high status in the NBA because of Zhang Hexiyun Bolun, his data is very good, his height is very advantageous, his body is very strong, he is very talented in basketball, his physical fitness is very good, he has created his own style of play, which is particularly powerful, and his defensive ability is very strong.

O'Neal's strength is unquestionable, and his offensive and defensive abilities are strong, with a total of 28,596 career points and 13,099 rebounds.

O'Neal's comprehensive strength is stronger, O'Neal's physical fitness is particularly dominant, whether it is weight or size, he has a very strong offensive power during the game, and the accuracy of shooting the basket is also particularly high.

Definitely O'Neill. O'Neill was basically unable to suppress at his peak, and Chamberlain lost his temper when he saw Russell.

The traversal is a little larger than estimated O'Neill, but it is difficult to say if the traverse is not carried out at the same time in the 90s. Chamberlain's peak season of 62 has not increased the weight significantly, O'Neal's peak is the 00 seasons with a significant increase in weight, 62 Chamberlain's strength is not as strong as 00 O'Neal, but the strength is stronger, the jump is too strong, 00 O'Neal's playoff defense is already problematic, 62 Chamberlain's bounce in the small-ball era is definitely enough, Chamberlain is 32 years old 69 seasons.

In addition, the long jump ability defense is too good, 69 Chamberlain's playoffs did not have the problem of outside speed defense, if all the peaks were in the 90s, Chamberlain's 69 seasons and O'Neal's 00 seasons should be at least the same strength, O'Neal who was unstoppable at the peak, when the Western Army formed a lot of interior lineups in the playoffs to deal with him, and twin tower combinations like David Robinson and Duncan also failed to completely resist O'Neal because his strength was too amazing, He played a strong dominant role and led the Lakers to three consecutive championships. <>

Chamberlain's lying push data is better than O'Neal's, but this does not indicate that Chamberlain's strength is greater than O'Neal's, first of all, the authenticity of the data is uncertain, secondly, people with strong prone thrust have better upper limb strength, and lower limb strength is not great, comprehensive upper limb strength and lower limb strength, people with strong lying thrust are not necessarily more powerful than him, in the NBA, O'Neal's lying down ranking is not high, and the bench pushers of these players are stronger than him in the base camp and Malone, does this mean that their strength is greater than O'Neal? <

Especially in 2004, the Finals base camp was said to have prevented O'Neal, but in fact, the base camp was not dominant in the single defense, however, the Pistons also had Rasheed Wallace, despite this, O'Neal still played 26 points and 10 rebounds on the court, shooting 63% from the field, and there were not many ways to limit Big Ben after getting the ball. <

In terms of physical fitness, no one in the NBA can compare to Chamberlain. Not to mention the minutes of the crazy 62 season, he averaged 45 minutes per game throughout his career. This is something that O'Neill can't catch up with in a Mercedes.

O'Neill's power is a little greater. Because O'Neill's physical fitness is very good, he has very strong limbs, his muscles are very developed, he often works out, and his strength will be greater.

O'Neill will be a little bigger, because O'Neal looks very burly. I think O'Neill's strength is relatively large, because strength and weight have a certain relationship, O'Neal's weight is relatively large.

O'Neal is more powerful and more popular, his body is stronger, and the overall effect will be better.

In terms of individual strength alone, I think Chamberlain's strength is superior. As the best center in the NBA, their strength is as good as the stats suggest. Some netizens even called the two of them "monsters" on the court.

It can be seen that their toughness, although the two have never really played on the basketball court, but from the overall data analysis, Chamberlain is obviously stronger.

I feel that they are quite different in the following aspects. Clause.

1. Physical ability. Judging from the comparison between the two, Chamberlain is meters tall and has an arm span. In comparison, O'Neill is meters tall and has a meter of reach.

O'Neill's palm is a centimeter in size, and Chamberlain is bigger than him, and from here it can come out that Chamberlain is slightly superior in all aspects. What's even more terrifying is that Chamberlain's flexibility and explosiveness are also very good under such a huge body. His run-up jump is 1 meter high, and he completes 40 yards in seconds, which is close to the top NBA guard.

O'Neill's maximum landing height is about meters, and he can jump about 90 centimeters. Chamberlain's maximum height was tested three times, in 1956, 1960, and 1968, and he could jump about 1 meter. It can be seen that Chamberlain's highest bounce in the three periods is better than O'Neill's peak form.

Clause. Second, speed. You've probably seen O'Neal dunk at a very fast pace.

But compared to Chamberlain, it is a bit inadequate. After all, Chamberlain is an ancient god, and there are too few recorded game pictures, but the sport he just started to contact was track and field, not to mention speed. Chamberlain ran the second at 40 yards.

The 30-year-old Chamberlain scored the same as James, the highest run in the NFL.

There is only one "basketball emperor" in the NBA, I think it's Chamberlain. Without Jordan, he would be the first person in the history of Cryptomatan! In fact, Chamberlain's personal honor was indeed a "hard wound" for him.

In his 14-year career, he won only two NBA championships, one FMVP, four regular-season MVPs, a seven-time All-Defensive Team, and a two-time All-Defensive Team. O'Neill's resume is slightly better than Chamberlain's. Although there was only one MVP in the regular season, during his career, the Sharks won four championship rings, three FMVPs, eight All-Star All-NBP, 15 All-Star and three All-Star MVPs.

Although O'Neill's grades are better, in terms of physical data and talent, Chamberlain can still abuse him.

Chamberlain belongs to the players of the ancient era, and O'Neal is a player of the 20th century, so it can only be seen from the data, Chamberlain's scoring ability and rebounding ability will be better than O'Neal.

If Chamberlain's physical fitness is a contemporane of the group training and the four centers, and it is cultivated according to the nutrition and training conditions of the four center era, then there is nothing to do with the four centers.

O'Neal's strength, O'Neal has participated in many differential games, scored a lot in the game, was selected as an NBA All-Star with 15 forehands, and won the NBA championship. Raise the suspicion.

If Chamberlain and O'Neal are more than a reed, I think it is still O'Neill's brother Jane Neal's victory, because O'Neill's size and weight have a unique advantage and can help him win.

There is never a shortage of talented players in the NBA, Jordan, O'Neal, James and others are all players who can fly away, but when it comes to the most talented players in NBA history, I believe everyone must think of Chamberlain, in terms of physical talent alone, Chamberlain's strength is undoubted. <>

Because of the long playing age, many people use the ancient monster to describe Chamberlain, and it is obvious from this nickname that everyone recognizes Chamberlain's physical talent. Chamberlain is 2.16 meters tall and has an arm span of 2.34 meters, which may seem normal now, but at that time, such a height and arm length were undoubtedly called giants. At that time, there was a big gap between people's living conditions and now, and the players' cognition of diet and training conditions were far worse than now, so the physical talent of the players at that time was generally not as good as now, but even under such conditions, Chamberlain still had such a terrifying physical talent, which was also an important reason why Chamberlain was able to call the wind and rain in the league at that time.

In addition to the appearance of height and arm length, Chamberlain's strength and athleticism are also very good, as a tall man of 2.16 meters, Chamberlain is not bloated and slow at all, and Chamberlain is no less than a defender in terms of physical agility, not only can run and jump but also is particularly good, and can often send amazing assists. In terms of strength, Chamberlain is also very terrifying, when he participated in a show, he once lifted an adult with his bare hands, and he was able to lift an adult easily, and his terrifying power can be imagined. <>

We don't know if there will be more talented players than Chamberlain in the future, but as of now I think Chamberlain's physical talent is the strongest in history, even James, who is known as the pride of the sky, is inferior to Chamberlain, of course, I have a personal opinion, you may not agree with Chamberlain, but for me there is no doubt about his greatness.

I agree. Chamberlain's strength is very strong, and then the talent in basketball is very strong, he has very brilliant achievements in his career, he has won MVP, won many international awards, his commercial value is also very high, his physical fitness is very good, and he is a genius who is very suitable for playing basketball.

I couldn't agree more, because Chamberlain showed his talent when he first entered the NBA, and he was able to bring his ability to a very high level without being involved in too many games.

I don't think so, because there are a lot of strong players in the NBA, and each player has great talent and ability, and they all have their own unique and excellent side.