In the era of entertainment to death , will people get farther and farther away from the truth?

No, people nowadays are becoming more and more rational, their level of culture and education is getting higher and higher, and they have a very objective judgment on physical objects.

There are many misunderstood events in every era, and we who live on the Internet may be misled by false reports, but justice will not be late, and the truth will slowly surface, so we must improve our ability to distinguish between right and wrong.

I think so, because the current society is too impetuous, and many people are in a state where they don't think it's a big deal to watch the excitement, and listening to the wind is the rain.

Personal opinion:

Enter the age of the Internet, Neil Bozeman.

The theory is still relevant, and we still need to be new **.

of "Entertain to death."

Be vigilant, and more importantly, affirm the value of legitimate entertainment and be wary of the negative effects of excessive entertainment. To fight entertainment to death, it is necessary for art creators to maintain their sincerity in art, and at the same time, art appreciators must maintain their own independent thinking and aesthetic judgment.

The hidden worries of pan-entertainment.

The new ** in the Internet era expresses new content with a freer and more open attitude, influencing a new generation of audiences, and the audience of this new media is also reshaping the direction of the new media.

From the perspective of online variety shows, because the creation of online programs is more free than TV programs, it also pays more attention to the release of entertainment spirit, and it is easy to slide to the edge of kitsch. "Tucao Conference" is hidden.

The first issue of the first season was removed from the shelves because of explicit language and excessive scale posture, "Wonderful Sayings".

It was also cut because the topic was too sensitive. Voyeurism, curiosity, and eyeballs once became the "magic weapon" for online variety shows to win by surprise.

In the final analysis, this is just a one-sided understanding of the spirit of violent entertainment. "Heavy taste" hot topics are indeed in line with the law of the attention economy, which can attract users at the lowest cost, successfully touch the "itch points" and "pain points" of young people, and become the best way to get to the top of online dramas.

However, he only pays attention to the exploration of the spirit of entertainment, sacrifices meaning for the sake of eyeball economy, gives up his taste for art and his responsibility to society, and can only fall into the situation of entertainment to death.

First of all, I want to speak for our young people: the root of the phenomenon of "entertainment to death" is not in us, nor in some traffic stars, let alone in which software applications, so what is it in?

Why are we so keen on consumer entertainment? In addition to the entertainment of entertainment itself, it is also because we cannot consume today's high-quality literary and artistic creations in time, that is, our demand for culture is far greater than the output of culture. As a result, we can only consume foreign culture and even our culture from 2,000 years ago, while more people who pursue convenience naturally choose to consume entertainment.

So is this to blame for the vast number of our literary and artistic workers? No, the lack of high-quality literary and artistic works is caused by the general environment. The phenomenon of "entertainment to death" appeared in the United States at the end of the last century and the beginning of this century, and it can be understood that market regulation cannot solve cultural problems outside the economy.

However, under our socialist market economic system with Chinese characteristics, which has the advantage of macroeconomic regulation and control, why is it that the performance in this regard is to some extent inferior to that of the United States?

I don't need to go into detail about the specific reasons, but I will talk about two other phenomena: in the 80s of the last century, the population growth rate was indeed controlled by the implementation of family planning across the country, but it brought about a new problem of population aging; During the reform and opening up, the policy of getting rich first and leading the latter to become rich was proposed, and now there are indeed more and more rich people, but some people have not fulfilled their due obligations, and even evaded taxes and fled with money.

The emergence of these phenomena has sounded the alarm bell for our reforms, and "entertainment to death" may be only the beginning of some more serious consequences. Is there something wrong with it? Isn't it overkill?

Over the years, our material living standards have become higher and higher, and the H-20 has been successfully developed very quickly, but what about our spiritual life? Is there always someone who feels that they have money and have nowhere to spend it?

It's always harder to solve a problem than to ask a question, but that's all I can do.