Tangled between 600D, D5100, K30

Decisive K30 ah. It's a notch higher than the 600D D5100. Plus the shoulder screen is the strongest in the mid-range machine. Wuling mirror, full viewing angle. It's basically all in order. It's no problem with mid-range machines.

At the beginning, the KR was already 600D D5100 (these two machines didn't even have a fuselage motor). Not to mention the K30 that has been upgraded in so many places.

Buying a SLR mainly depends on where you want to use it,These three machines can basically be classified as entry-level machines,If it is used for family outings, I personally recommend D5100,Super cost-effective,The same imaging elements and processors have a mature embodiment in D7000。 Anyone who knows a little bit knows that Nikon is much stronger than Canon in the case of a low-end lens,Specifically, you can search for D5100 and 600D reviews,Canon was defeated,Binder is relatively more niche,My colleague bought Binder KR for personality at the time, but found that the high sense is really bad,In addition, the film is not bad in full sunlight,In the case of poor light, it can't even be compared with Sony A550,Each ** has to be repaired。

Canon's focus is more convenient, the colors are bright, and the lens group supports more, and the lenses are all with motors; Nikon's imaging is relatively sharp, and there are many lens groups, but some older lenses do not have lens motors, and the D5100 cannot support autofocus; It is recommended that the landlord see how much money he plans to invest in the future, and he prefers which style and operation interface of the machine he likes, and he can go to the physical store to try the machine. SLR, each has good things, in terms of production, product line, lens support, Pentax is not as good as Nikon. Mirror, or Nikon variety, specifications, higher grade.

My SLR is Pentax K-R, and I think it's enough for daily use, so we don't burn it. Pentax is not doing well in domestic marketing. Parallel imports are mostly parallel and warranty is difficult, but it is much cheaper.

Hope mine can help you.

Personally, I recommend K30, which is waterproof and dustproof.

Someone downstairs recommended K-5,In fact, I personally like K-5,Pentax likes the color of the film very much,Although there is no Canon on the brand、Nikon sound,But it has its own characteristics。

These three buckets are about the same, and the difference between SLRs is more in the lens. It is recommended to go to 5100 for a high cost performance'In addition, Nikon's lenses are more selective, so you can buy more of them directly. Usually the scenery plus the portrait is enough. Hope it helps.

Buy the D3200, among the low-end entry-level SLR cameras, it will always be Nikon's most generous and cost-effective.

For SLR, I chose Nikon and Canon, and I think the 600D is good.

You don't think about 450d, 550d, d3000, but you like d3100, dd, and 60d, which means that you have the money to buy 600d, and you have the idea of saving face (60d).

If you really want to learn photography, you really don't want to burn money, needless to say, 450D, 550D, D3000, even Sony A290 can fully meet the needs of practice.

People have different ideas and hearts about buying things, and a few people pay attention to economic applicability and go their own way, regardless of what others say, but there are indeed fewer such people. And most people are both economical and affordable (not to lose face). I think you should belong to the first grandson of the latter, and there is nothing wrong with belonging to the latter, but you must first position your shopping thoughts and hearts accurately, so that you can decide what to buy and what not to buy.

If you are not only economical and applicable, but also can take it out, you have to 60d.

Although the 60D is much more expensive, it is slightly better than the D3100, D5100, and 600D in all aspects, especially the shoulder screen of the professional machine, which is indeed much more magnificent. Once you buy one of the D3100, D5100, or 600D, you will regret it when you see the 60D in the future.

The root of the entanglement is the lack of silver, otherwise the mid-range machines like 7D and D7000 can't be looked down on, and it is directly 5D and D700.

D3100, D5100, 600D and 60D are not too different, buy things, buy things, which chain is tight, in the case of what you can, or buy your favorite group carnival, not urgent, wait a minute, raise money to buy 60D.

Nikon's 2 models,Personally, I still recommend D5100,The pixel height is secondary,The rotating screen is secondary,The key is that D5100The 920,000 resolution screen is 2 grades higher than D3100's230,000,In many cases, the photos are not taken well,It can't be seen on the low-resolution screen。 600D and D5100 are competitors, but Juezen is rolling 600D is quite chicken, and the cost performance is not as good as D5100. 60D is a mid-range model, no matter the workmanship, the performance is higher than the first 3, of course, the most tangled is **.

Judging from personal experience, the playability of the mid-range model and the enthusiasm of consumers are definitely higher than that of the entry-level model, so it is your best choice to buy the 60D with unlimited funds, followed by the D5100, and finally the D3100 and 600D.

In fact, anyone who plays SLR knows it: the iron shot, the flowing body. The SLR body is the easiest part to replace.

The biggest feature of SLR that distinguishes it from other cameras is the interchangeable lens, so the lens is the greatest fun of SLR. The pleasure of investing in the lens is far greater than the investment in the body. Therefore, it is recommended that you do not have to pay too much attention to the choice of the body when buying a DSLR, but should first study and learn the chain hole selection and optimization combination of the lens.

The most cost-effective is Nikon's D3000+18-55. But now it's about the same as D3100, so it is recommended that you buy D3100+18-55 sets, less than 3000, and you can buy a 50 set. ps, don't treat Canon's 1100d as a SLR, lose the face of the SLR.

Canon's can be used with 550d, 650d is not necessary, up to 600d. Pentax is generally more generous than Nikon and Canon, and there is no way to open up the market. Anyway, Nikon used to be very kind, but now it's learning more and more from Canon.

The Japanese are traitors. The contrast between 18-105 and 18-55 is like the difference between tractor and pickup truck loading.

K30 is the best, D5100 is second, 650D is last.

It doesn't matter if you're a novice or not, it's all very easy to use.

Because the battery model is not the same.

Personal choice or like 600D, the price is indeed not as much worse than the landlord said The camera is not just a comparison of CMOS, a lot Including the control of the lens group, etc., marketing strategies, other inputs, etc. may also affect**.

Both cameras have their own merits. The advantages of the 600D are the fuselage motor (which is much cheaper when equipped with a portrait fixed focus head) and the control is a little better (I don't know what they say, it seems that there are many shortcut keys for operation); The advantage of the 5100 is that the first-time imaging effect is good, and the low-end lens is real.

The body of the 5100 does not have a motor, but the sleeve lenses are all with a motor and do not need to be manual.

If you want to buy practical and worthwhile, you should wait and buy the D5100+18-105 set, even if you buy a small set now, it is estimated that it will not take long for you to change it, it is better to be in place at one time.

Another:1I'm also struggling with your question, and the answer I got from the master is:

If you finish taking a picture of ** and like to fix him to perfection, then it's 600d, but it's like 5100 when you come out of the film. If you think about the development of high-end lenses and not bad money (or can borrow high-end lenses), Canon. If you don't have a lot of money, and you just want a low-end lens that doesn't have more than 10,000 effects, then Nikon.

2.Look at the question you asked to remind you of the focus. Neither 600D nor D5100 are full-frame cameras, so they should be multiples, and the standard fixed focus of the angle of view pointed out in the photography textbook should be a 35mm lens, which is more appropriate, and 50mm larger.

3.I want to buy D5100, but it's out of budget, so I'm going to wait and scrape together the money to go directly to D5100+18-105. In the future, when you have more money on hand, you can get a 35mm fixed focal head.

If you don't have a particularly fever, these two heads are basically enough. The rest is a matter of photography skills.

Brother, be cautious before buying. That's a lot of rice.

5100 Wood Body Motor 50 Manual required...

If you're struggling with that, it's 600d.

Personally, I think I can still bear it... 50 is also not expensive.

See what you want to shoot? Canon for portraits, Nikon for landscapes. Novices buy a pullover, and then change it to a better one in the future, manual focus is accurate, there is its value, autofocus is easier to use for novices, if you just buy it to play, you should go to automatic, Canon body motor, Nikon lens motor.

If you want to buy a lens in the future, Nikon's will be more expensive, but Nikon lenses have better optical imaging.

The D5100 is a good machine, and the small case is also autofocused.

550D D, 60D, D5100 as an entry-level machine and daily family, travel use are relatively good machines, from the needs of daily shooting alone, needless to say550D D, 60D, D5100, even Sony A290 can also be completely full (because the fuselage is only one aspect, other important aspects are also determined by the lens, head).

People have different ideas and hearts when buying things, and a few people pay attention to affordability and go their own way, regardless of what others say. And most people are not only economical, but also can take out (not lose face), this kind of thinking is not wrong, but the idea of shopping and the heart of the positioning is accurate, in order to target what to buy, what not to buy.

Although the 60D is more expensive, it is slightly better than the 550D, D5100, and 600D in many aspects, especially the shoulder screen of the professional machine, which is indeed much more magnificent. Once you buy one of the 550d, d5100, 600d bridge destruction baggage, you will regret it when you see it in the future.

Buy things and buy things, come over as soon as you can, buy a little better, or buy your favorite, buy 60d. If the money is not abundant, just go on a 60d+18-135 set of cameras, and most of the daily (travel) shooting can be satisfied. If you have high requirements for the quality of the film, you should match the wide-angle, fixed-focus, telephoto and other subfocal segments with good lenses that you can afford.

600d or d5100

One is Canon and the other is Nikon depending on which one you prefer.

I like the Canon and it works well on the 600d.

If you don't want to engage in professional photography, the entry machine is enough.

And it's lighter, and the features are good.

The most important thing is to like it!

550d is enough, the key is to look at the lens. When shooting scenery during travel, a wide-angle lens is a must-have.

I prefer the 600D for the two machines, which are basically better than the D5100 in all aspectsIn the entry-level SLR, the 600D is indeed the king. It is also more convenient to upgrade later and has better scalability.

D5100 does not have a body motor has a certain impact on the later stage, mainly when choosing a lens, you can't choose a lens without a focus motor, for example, you can't buy a cost-effective 50mm f, if you buy it, you can only buy 50mm f, which is twice as expensive**. However, there is no significant effect on imaging.

But the D5100 is not without advantages at all, in comparison, the 18-105 sleeve is still more cost-effective than the Canon 18-135 sleeve, and when recording on the screen, Nikon offers autofocus more generously than Canon.

Generally speaking, you need to choose a camera according to your own needs, 600D is more advantageous, but it also depends on what you mainly shoot, Canon has soft colors in all aspects and is more suitable for portraits, and Nikon has sharp imaging and is more suitable for shooting landscapes.

In addition, it is recommended to buy a 50mm fixed focus head in the case of meters, or in the case of meters in the future, which will help to practice composition and improve the level.

d5100。

Canon's low-end body can't be used, mainly considering the lens, Canon's low-end head meat is close to paste, and it really can't be used.

In the actual use of low-to-mid-range shutters, Nikon is much more durable.

The Nikon products of the 2nd generation processor are different from their predecessors, and the white balance accuracy is higher, which has surpassed that of Canon.

Before the 5100, the only advantage of the 600D was that the focusing speed was slightly faster (but Nikon had better focus stability, and the difference between the two was larger when the light was bad).

Entry-level SLR, in general, Nikon is kinder than Canon! The CMOS of the 5100 is the same as that of the D7000, and the D5100 is recommended

Of course, it's 5100, and it's much more cost-effective.