The king is actually both civil and military, why did he become a tyrant in the mouth of later gener

Because in "Fengshen Bang", the king was bewitched by Daji and killed Zhongliang, and killed the lives of the people casually just to win a smile from Daji, under the continuous promotion of film and television dramas, the king became a veritable tyrant, after all, no one will check the real history, and after the image of the film and television drama is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, the king has become such a character.

1. The continuous filming of film and television dramas makes the audience think that the king is a tyrant who can only kill people. The most common people know about the king of the gods is from the film and television dramas, and more are known from the "Fengshen List" about the character of the king of the Zhou and the image of doing things for people, in "The God List", the king is a tyrant who is greedy for money, lustful, mediocre, cruel to loyalty, and careless of human lifemay not make people feel how hateful the king is, but after there are more film and television dramas, people slowly accept the image of the tyrant of the king.

Even if it is said in film and television dramas or in the news that King Xuan is a genius of Wen Taowu, no one will believe itBecause those plots in film and television dramas have defined King Su as a tyrant, even if he is whitewashed, no one will believe it.

Second, ordinary people know very little about history and basically get information from TV dramas, so King Su has become this kind of character. In fact, most of the time ordinary people understand history through film and television dramas, and few people go through historical documents to understand what kind of people the characters in film and television dramas areAfter the continuous broadcast of film and television dramas has created an impression in people's minds, this perception cannot be changed, so it's not impossible to misunderstand the image of the king as nothing.

After all, there are very few people who can understand the real situation of history, so after remembering the cruelty and inhumanity of King Su in the film and television drama, he directly defined him as a tyrant, and no matter how he explained it, he couldn't change itAfter all, the pictures in film and television dramas are too shocking, and the words are simply incomparable.

Finally: If I hadn't read some historical documents, I would have thought that King Su was a straw bag tyrant who couldn't do anything, and I really couldn't watch more film and television dramas!

Although the king was both civil and military, he did not make political achievements that were beneficial to the country, and spent the people's efforts to repair the deer platform, and indulged in the wine pond meat forest and beauty. China pays the most attention to both ability and political integrity, but the king of Xuan only has one point of talent, and lacks ten points of virtue.

In terms of personal ability, the king of Shang was a very capable person, but some of his measures were tyrannical, so he was called a tyrant.

Turn. No, the character of the king of Shang has two sides, the king of Shang is warlike, his talent is intelligent, he is very sensitive, and his talent is outstanding. After succeeding to the throne, he attached great importance to territorial expansion, sent troops to attack the Dongyi tribes, obtained a large number of prisoners, and extended the Shang Dynasty's power to the Yangtze River Valley.

Although he was warlike to the point of withering the people, his behavior was not as unbearable as later generations had rumored.

I don't think the Shang Dynasty was necessarily a planer, because from a certain point of view, there were many centuries when he was not a tyrant, but the later Western Zhou Dynasty portrayed him as a tyrant. Of course, we are not people who live in that dynasty, and there is no need to delve into these things, because what he writes in the history books is what he is.

The historical performance and historical records of the king of Shang are that he was a grumpy man, but he was not a faint king

Not a tyrant. The strategists are bad, and the lonely raccoon is poisonous.

According to the research of many historians, there is a big difference between the true image of Emperor Xin of Shang and the historical record. This is because the Shang Dynasty advocated witchcraft and had great cultural contradictions with the Zhou Dynasty, so it was typical to belittle the Shang Dynasty and weaken the influence of the Shang Dynasty.

Shangshu has"Today, the king of Shang has suffered from the unreasonable, violently destroyed the heavens, abused the people, and fled the world for the lord. "

No one saw what happened at that time, so if you look at history, it is presumed that this is the case.

There are two sides to everyone!! Can't generalize!

The Shang Dynasty was considered a tyrant in Chinese history for a long time, on a par with Xia Wei. In this period of history, later generations added fantasy elements to write "The Romance of the Gods", also known as "The Gods List".

However, there is a view that many aspects of the evaluation of Di Xin are historically incremental. There are not many accusations against him in pre-Qin literature, and some documents even praise the Shang King for his intelligence, bravery, and talent, as a rare hero.

But as time went on, all sorts of accusations against him grew. Zigong also said: "If it is not good, it is better to be worse." It is a gentleman who is evil and is indecent, and all the evil in the world is returned. ”

In fact, after the Shang king succeeded to the throne, the early governance was still good, the Shang king made great efforts, determined to reform, did not kill slaves, developed production, updated concepts, and did not worry about ghosts and gods.

Attach importance to agriculture and mulberry, develop social productive forces, and make the country strong. He trained troops deep in the mountains, cast weapons, and continued to initiate the use of troops against Dongyi, repelled the expansion of Dongyi to the Central Plains, expanded the power of the Shang Dynasty to the Jianghuai region, consolidated the unification of Dongyi and the Central Plains, and spread the advanced Central Plains culture to the Huai River and Yangtze River valleys, laying the foundation for the unification of the Chinese nation.

In particular, the victory of the crusade against Xu Yi expanded the territory of the Shang Dynasty to the coastal areas of Shandong, Anhui, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Fujian.

Di Xin's use of troops against the Dongnan Yi protected the security of the Shang Dynasty. After the Yin Dynasty conquered Dongyi, the territory expanded, agriculture developed, and the wealth and grain increased. "Bamboo Book Chronicle" cloud: "Thick endowment Rui to the real Lutai money, and Yingju Bridge of millet".

When evaluating the king of Shang, he said: "In fact, the king is a very capable, capable of writing and martial arts.

He unified the southeast and consolidated the Tongyi and plains of Dongyi, which was a meritorious service in history. After the unification of the southeast by the king of Shang, the advanced production technology and culture of the Central Plains were spread to the southeast, which promoted social progress and economic development, and promoted national integration.

This man is a mediocre man, indeed a tyrant, and that's why he will eventually perish.

This is not necessarily, everyone has many facets, for example, it is written in the historical records that he was brave and quick-witted.

The king recorded in the history books is not as mediocre as depicted in the film and television drama. On the contrary,On the contrary, King Su is a conscientious emperor, and he is very capable in many aspects such as governing the country and reusing talents.

As the last king of the Shang Dynasty, although the current film and television dramas describe him as a mediocre monarch, in fact, from the perspective of historical facts, King Su is not completely mediocre, but a monarch who can be civil and martial. First of all, there is no real case to prove whether the king is really brutal or not. Secondly, whether the king of Xuan killed the nobles or not is not considered in history.

However, it is clearly recorded in history that after the succession to the throne, the king implemented the employment system, selected those who could be used from the bottom, further strengthened the control of foreign services in the court, and mastered the centralization of power.

The idea of the king of Shang is also very unprecedented, in the slave society, he has already implemented the law in the court, and even acted meritocraticly, leading the people to correct their thinking and not to believe in theocracy at will. In the process of the reign of King Xu, he single-handedly consolidated and united Dongyi and the Central Plains, which shows that his ability is also absolutely unremarkable.

Yes, that's what the history books say.