Is my philosophical mind normal, and what does thinking and being mean philosophically?

We cannot say that a certain feeling of a person is wrong, and the objective laws or truths of nature need to be tested by practice. Of course, each of us has our own philosophical concepts, including the world, life, values, etc., but as you said, perhaps many people live unclear lives, just because their worldview is not clear, fragmented, and unsystematic. When we focus on something, we will always have some perception and comprehension, and we will form some of our own views on objective things, which is very normal...

Everyone has their own secrets, their own thoughts, but maybe they don't know it.

It's normal to have your own thoughts, but don't deliberately pressure yourself, relax appropriately, maybe you can also find someone or a psychiatrist to talk about your troubles, don't hold it in your heart alone, that will be worse.

Remember one sentence: The world is turbid, you are clear, then you are the most turbid person; Everyone in the world is drunk, and if you wake up alone, then you are the one who is the most drunk.

Why bother to care so much, just think of it as a little secret in your heart, maybe after a long time you suddenly look back on the past and you will suddenly be enlightened.

No, you have the same thoughts as a poet, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with your thoughts, and a thinking person should be like this from a thinking point of view.

It is the relationship between subjective cognition and objective objects.

1. The term thinking refers to the cognitive, conscious, and spiritual aspects;

2. The term existence refers to the aspect of the object of cognition, including material existence and spiritual existence.

3. Generally speaking, the question of the relationship between thinking and existence is the basic problem of philosophy; Strictly speaking, the question of the relationship between spirit and matter is a fundamental question of philosophy.

Thinking refers to consciousness, spirit; Existence refers to matter; Thinking and being are consciousness and matter. The question of the relationship between thinking and being is a fundamental question of philosophy.

The philosophical meaning of thinking and existence, then it depends on which kind of philosophy you believe in, then, within the category of existential philosophy, if you talk about thinking and existence, then, thinking is an extension of existence, in fact, they are basically existence without much distinction, that is, we have a process of self-reflection and self-improvement, so this is actually a process of thinking, but this kind of thinking is not that kind of primary thinking, but a kind of reflective thinking. So existence is only a deeper mind, and in other philosophical connotations. They may have different referential effects.

Thinking is philosophically a spiritual thing, and existence is a material thing.

A person's children usually don't have good grades, and they definitely don't do well in the college entrance examination. ”

This assertion, from the point of view of the way of thinking, is an incomplete inductive reasoning, it is not a necessary reasoning. Logically, the mistake of rash generalizations was made. In other words, this view of the subject, both objectively and subjectively, is not very correct.

The main question is to distinguish what is objective and what is subjective.

Subjectivity is the subjective judgment and reasoning made by the "subject who issued the opinion" after observing and thinking, which is also called the reflection of the main rough paragraph.

Objectivity, relative to the subject of thinking, relative to the person who "gives out opinions", is a condition of reality that does not depend on the will of man, and is also called objective existence.

Therefore, as long as the subject teases the Lord to express his opinion on something, it is a subjective idea and the main method. Because subjectivity is a reflection of objectivity.

Subjectivity is secondary, and it may correctly reflect the objective, or it may be wrong, distorted, or illusory to reflect the objective existence.

No. Philosophy is the quest for intuition, putting that statement in words, and then sharing it.

Philosophy is an understanding.

We can understand what is right. We can understand that something went wrong. We can understand what is real. Moreover, we can understand what is untrue.

We do this by thinking, but you have to be very deliberate. The idea of answering a reed at will not make you understand anything.

You also need to think deeply.

Philosophy related to reality will require a lot of physical evidence and first-hand observation of the world.

Philosophy related to psychology will require a high level of devotion in your own psyche and in the behavior of others.

As always, literature helps.

Philosophy is the continuation of thought, and if someone has already thought of it, there is no point in thinking about it again. Just start there.

Is it possible to think without philosophy?

I'm not sure what this question means. Many animals believe that there has been an extraordinary observation of crows in this regard. The team of engineers who design aircraft engines all think about speeding without any philosophy.

There are a lot of bad insights and contrived ideas in philosophy. In my opinion, the Kalam cosmology is a good example. But that's another question.

Should we call it philosophical thinking?

There are many types of thinking, such as creative thinking (problem-solving, innovation), critical thinking (improving our thinking), and many more. Philosophy is about thinking about the purpose and meaning of life, what is right and wrong, and how we know what we know, and so on. It's more of a deep and basic way of thinking.

Therefore, it is best to leave a clear and understandable philosophy in our communication.

What are some examples of biased thinking in philosophy?

Every idea is one-sided, especially. In philosophy! How can one think absolutely or comprehensively in a way that encompasses everything (in one subject)? (One can say "God," but so what?) How could this possibly be of any help? ）

The basic question of philosophy is the question of how and what is the use of the study of philosophy. Deviating from this question and releasing it to other questions is not a fundamental "philosophical" question.

The question of the relationship between thinking and existence is not a "fundamental problem of philosophy" at all, but a "problem of the application of the laws of speculation" in philosophy. Philosophy is inseparable from the application of speculative laws, but the application of speculative laws is only a question of "how human beings should think" in philosophy, and it is not a question of "how does philosophy occur and what is the use of this kind of source learning".

All knowledge is established by use, which is a useful "gene" for the occurrence of learning. Without this gene, all learning would not have been possible. Thus, the basic question of philosophy is the question of how and what is the use of the study of philosophy.

Considering the "relationship between thinking and existence" as a basic problem of philosophy is an obstacle to academic speculation that has not achieved a breakthrough in the academic level of Chinese philosophy for a hundred years. If we study this kind of knowledge without understanding the usefulness of it, then this kind of knowledge cannot be studied—we can only follow the trend and speculate nonsense. This is a rebuttal conclusion that leaves no room for question.

Frontier cultural scholars should be aware of the cultural common sense that cultural phenomena that are widely believed to be correct and falsified are common. After such a proven fallacy is proven, there will be a cultural correction stage in which people generally pursue the false statement and reject the correct statement. Therefore, I must also seriously refute the current "satisfaction" at the top to correct the error.

Please admin set this hail of mine to "satisfied".