What is the quality of Supor? How can I hear people say that it takes less than 3 years to have prob

You alright. Supor is an expert when it comes to kitchenware. We have a Supor rice cooker at home, and we have used it for more than ten years without any quality problems.

There are also kettles and pottery woks that have been around for almost three years, and there have been no quality problems. And the water boiled out of the kettle is different from the ordinary kettle, with less rust and good taste. The wok has almost no smoke and heats evenly, but not too hot, and maintains good nutrition.

My sister is very hilarious because she uses this pot to fry potatoes without a pot. ）

First, all companies have the problem of defective products.

Second, you should pay attention to those precautions when using. Try not to break the rules.

Third, when buying, go to a big place, don't buy defective or counterfeit products.

Big brands should be fine.

It just so happened that I had a Supor defective product, I bought an induction cooker and burned it several times in a few months, not to mention the soymilk machine, because it sucks, if you want to buy it, it is recommended that you determine if there is a Supor maintenance point near your home, because you may go there often in the future.

Upstairs may be Torto!

Three years? Multiple repairs in less than a year! The customer service prevaricates, lies repeatedly, deceives consumers and refuses to fulfill the three guarantees, you are lucky if you don't buy it.

No, Supor's stuff is safe to use, and it's addictive to use.

I've bought Supor's wok and rice cooker, and there is no problem with the wall breaker.

Supor rice cooker real garbage, don't buy it.

Summary. Hello, dear, I'm honored to answer for you! <>

The main problem of Supor is that its unreasonable capital structure has led to the poor results of collective management. The average asset-liability ratio of Supor in the past five years is that the asset-liability level is obviously low, which shows that Supor has failed to make reasonable use of the liability structure, the asset-liability ratio has not reached the optimal state, and the debt scale is relatively conservative. At present, the pattern of the small household appliance market is one super and two strong, one super beautiful, and two strong Su Jiu.

Midea Group is in a leading position in the small household appliance industry, and Joyoung has been moving forward side by side with Supor. In order to intuitively understand the level of its asset-liability ratio, Supor is specially compared with Midea Group and Joyoung, and the following figure shows the asset-liability ratio of the three companies from 2016 to 2020.

Problems with Supor.

What are the financial problems of Supor.

Nearly three years. Hello, dear, I'm honored to answer for you! <>

The main problem of Supor is that its unreasonable capital structure has led to the poor results of collective management. The average asset-liability ratio of Supor in the past five years is that the overall asset-liability level is significantly low, which shows that Supor has failed to make reasonable use of the liability structure, the asset-liability ratio has not reached the optimal state, and the debt scale is relatively conservative. At present, the pattern of the small household appliance market is one super and two strong, one super beautiful, and two strong Su and Sun Jiu.

Midea Group is in a leading position in the small household appliance industry, and Joyoung has been moving forward side by side with Supor. In order to intuitively understand the level of its asset-liability ratio, Supor is compared with Midea Group and Joyoung Qinglu, and the following figure shows the asset-liability ratio of the three companies from 2016 to 2020.

From 2016 to 2020, the asset-liability ratio of Midea Group Qizhisun was the highest, which has been maintained at more than 60%, and the asset-liability ratio of Supor Company as a whole is below that of Midea Group and the difference is 20 percentage points, the gap is very obvious, and the average asset-liability ratio of Midea Group has reached a higher than the average asset-liability ratio of Supor. In addition, Supor's internal financing in 2019 and 2020 was larger, resulting in a decrease in the asset-liability ratio of the company in these two years. Compared with the asset-liability ratio of Joyoung, it can be seen that the asset-liability ratio of Supor in the first three years is higher than that of Joyoung.

Supor is a brand that has been old for many years, and it is really convenient to use.