Smart topic and a famous writer why he didn t have works

If one day Haruki Murakami wins the Nobel Prize for Literature, the transfer of the literature of the whole world to the classics will be quietly completed, and it will be a disaster for those great works that we have admired for so long. Of course, this is not what the author said, Yan Lianke said it in the "Yan Lianke Literature Class". At that time, Yan Lianke also said that in his opinion, in the past ten years,Literary works have a common characteristic:

Yan Lianke called this kind of literature "bitter coffee literature".Because "they are like bitter coffee, a little cold is warm, a little bitter is sweet". The representative writers of "bitter coffee literature" are Carver, Monroe, Franzen and Haruki Murakami.

In short, in fact, he thinks that Haruki Murakami's work is too small in mode and does not pay enough attention to practical issues such as human nature and the times, which is very different from the great writers in his mind. In 2014,Yan LiankeWinner of the "Kafka Prize for Literature". Kafka was one of the founders of "modernist literature".

He was a famous "master of expressionism" in the 20th century. His works are similar to Lu Xun, profoundly and profoundly revealing the dark side of society. Unfortunately, Kafka was very worried about the future of literature after his death, which may coincide with Mo Yan's "posthumous seal".

It can be seen,Yan LiankeVery concerned about the realities of today's society, so if he thinks that Murakami doesn't pay enough attention to realities, then it makes sense that Murakami shouldn't have won the Nobel Prize. But Yan Lianke is a famous writer. Naturally, his words caught the attention of many.

In Yan Lianke's view, a writer cannot be called great if he cannot tell his readers what to do in difficult times. For Haruki Murakami,Yan Lianke said that although Haruki Murakami's ** is much better than Yasunari Kawabata, Yukio Mishima, Kenzaburo Oe, and Ryunosuke Akutagawa,But he can't see people's living conditions in today's Haruki Murakami**, which is why in Yan Lianke's opinion, Haruki Murakami shouldn't have so much aura.

I think everybody looks at it differently, and maybe it's because someone can understand his work that he won the Kraft Prize for Literature.

Very well written. He is a compassionate writer. The work has a depth of thought. I wish him the Nobel Prize after Mo Yan!

Yan Lianke's "Four Books" is very rich and novel, so it won a Kafka Literary Prize.

At present, two Czech editions of Yan Lianke's works have been published, and the full-length "Four Books" has also been translated.

It's also a writer I really like. He is also good at digging into human nature, and his style is somewhat similar to Mo Yan.

I think it can be Yan Lianke, which is also a writer I like very much. He is also good at digging into human nature

Controversial descriptions are valued, his ideas are clear, his literary skills are solid, and his language is sharp, which should be his characteristics.

In foreign scholars, he believes that his description of Henan is half of history, which is very ironic to the society at that time.

There is a good saying: I don't mean that everyone likes the renminbi, and if you don't rate it, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's bad.

Bright thoughts, solid literary skills, although controversial, but he is also well-deserved.

Some people like him, some people don't like his work, but it's good to win an award anyway.

Yan Lianke has a solid literary foundation, his characters are vivid, and his thoughts are prominent and distinct.

Soran didn't win the highest literary prize, but his talent was enough to win the Kafkavin Literary Prize.

The Four Books have brought about changes in people's thinking and are good textbook-style literary works.

Because he really writes so well, he can win the Kafka Prize for Literature.

Because his thoughts, his feelings, have reached the apex of history, so he won the award.

Since ancient times, conduct and knowledge have been spoken of separately.

If a writer can win the Nobel Prize, it means that Yan Lianke is very powerful.

Although they are not well-known, it does not mean that their works are very poor, there is no connection between the intelligent do and the works, we have to look at this problem rationally.

Because of these relatively low-profile writers, as well as their works, although they are relatively low-profile, the content of their works is great.

Their popularity is low, but that doesn't mean their work is bad.

Although their popularity is relatively low, the strength of their works is all there, after all, it does not mean that if their fame is relatively low, their works will not work.

Because these works cover a lot of political factors in them, it is said that the popularity is low, but it does not mean that his works are bad, on the contrary, the popularity is low, and it is possible that people are waiting for a wave of accumulation.

Because in this way, the comprehensiveness of the Nobel Prize can be reflected, and it is also a way.

The strength of their works is all there, after all, it doesn't mean that the fame is relatively low, and the works are not good.

It doesn't mean that his works are bad, on the contrary, the popularity is low, and it is possible that people are waiting for a wave of accumulation.

Although few people know about their works, they write well.

First of all, we must understand the characteristics of the writer's work, what are the characteristics of the main readership, and then combine the evaluation of the writer or his work in the society to determine the title.

You have to analyze what is in it, you can write about compassion, humanistic feelings, etc., there is not much creativity, everything you think of has been written.

The biography of a certain writer, the writer who writes the best to go to heaven.