Which is better, Canon EOS 60D or Sony A560 The main thing is what are the disadvantages of each, th

Upstairs copy-paste or something, it's too inappropriate

The 60d and 580 are fundamentally different levels. Strictly speaking, the 60D is positioned in the mid-range, and the 580 is the entry-level (a lot of ** because Sony now has no mid-range class, and it is ridiculous to say that the 580 is the mid-range).

So, then there's the difference between mid-range and entry-level.

The mid-range has an advantage over the entry-level with a shoulder screen, dual dials, and more shortcut keys, which can greatly improve the speed of operation for proficient camera users, which is also more conducive to capturing and saving time. Once you've gotten your hands on it, you'll soon be dissatisfied with the poor handling at the entry level. That's why although the 580 is naively referred to as mid-range by many, it can only be entry-level because of these essential issues.

In addition, the mid-range electronic technology is often a little higher than the entry-level, such as focusing, metering, continuous shooting and other performance, and because of this, some entry-level are sought after by the parameter party because of their high parameters, and some mid-range are spurned by the parameter party because of their low parameters. Just like 60D and 580, in terms of electronic technology, in fact, the two machines are not far away, so they are inferior to the most essential maneuverability.

Compared with the two machines, if you want to say which one is better, you have to combine your own situation to decide.

If you intend to get involved in photography and learn photography technology, then a mid-range level is a must, rather than the current ** door level 580 wait until you are not satisfied with the future and then invest in buying a mid-range body for a second time, it is better to buy a mid-range level as soon as possible, so you don't have to re-adapt to the operation in the future, and you can also play a little harder.

If you're just playing, or just at home, then 580 is enough. Because for this usage, the mid-range level does not play to the advantage, or the mid-range handling advantage is buried like this.

Key Benefits of the 650D:

9 cross-cross focus points, with precise peripheral focus points; The touch screen is more intuitive.

The main advantages of 57:

15 focus points (including 3 cross focus points) for fast focusing speed; High-speed continuous shooting, more able to seize the wonderful moment.

Other improvements of 650D compared to 600D are, HDR, multi-frame noise reduction, continuous focus during photography, in fact, these are all learned from Sony, and the effect is not as good as the Sony 55 two years ago, let alone 57.

The time lag of the optical viewfinder has long been chased or caught up by the electronic viewfinder (it is stupid to shout that the electronic viewfinder is not good after only using a cheap consumer-grade SLR telephoto machine), and the coverage and magnification of Canon's low-end SLR are far inferior to the Sony single battery (simply put, the viewfinder of the single battery looks bigger and brighter), and the electronic viewfinder is the real "what you see is what you get", the optical viewfinder of the SLR cannot see the color, white balance, and depth of field of the final film (that is, the degree of bokeh, Depth-of-field preview is not as good as that). The range of the 650D is nowhere near as good as that of the 57 (440 vs 590).

The touch screen looks very good, but you can only set the parameters, and you have to double-click to confirm, compared with the Panasonic GF series, it's just weak, and 650D When using the touch screen, the right hand has to leave the handle to change postures. The 57 eyes do not need to leave the viewfinder to browse**, and make a variety of parameter settings, and the control is actually more low-key and faster.

Let's be honest, although the 650D is new, the overall performance is still not good.

If you don't mind that Sony doesn't have celebrity endorsements in the mainland, then it's more cost-effective to choose 57.

The Canon EOS 650D is a DSLR, and the Sony A57 is a single-electric. The parameters are all about the same. But for now, the DSLR is better than the single battery, because one is optical framing and the other is electronic framing.

Take a look at the evaluation yourself, I'm too lazy to talk nonsense, SLR and semi-translucent single battery have their own merits, not what the two upstairs said.

Don't get entangled, choose one of the two, you must be Canon SLR. The single point is currently a flower job, a toy smashed in the hand.

Upstairs is full of nonsense!! At present, Sony's single-electric performance is a spike in CN at the same price, and even Canon's 5D3 can't do Sony A77!!

First of all, the owner knows whether he will upgrade the lens in the future, if he upgrades the lens, it is recommended to choose Canon's machine, because Canon's lens group is very powerful (whether it is the original factory or the auxiliary factory), and the choice is relatively large; If you don't upgrade the lens, go for the Sony A580, which is cheaper than the Canon. What about Canon's machine,It is recommended that you choose550D,550DThe time on the market is longer than 600D,The price reduction space is also smaller than 600D,Value preservation,600D has not made great progress in technical parameters compared with 550D,The more obvious change is only the addition of a rotatable screen。 Recommend the landlord on 550d. Hope to adopt.

The Sony A580 is positioned as a mid-range mid-range, while the Canon 600D and 550D are positioned as entry-level high-end. It's not a level, so the A580 is cost-effective.

At the same price, there is also Sony A55 to choose from (A55 is called single electric, in fact, it is not much different from SLR).

If you don't plan to invest in the future, you will enter the A65M, and you may continue to have a fever for 60D.

Reason: S has no high-end products, A900 has been supported for many years, and low-end lenses are far better than other brands except Pentax.

Minolta's 35-105F4**1000- Black Gold 28-135 is less than 2000, Canon's 4000+

There is not much difference between the fixed focal heads**.

Individuals use one A450, one N D90, and the company's D800E. In terms of image quality, D90 and A450 have their own advantages,D90 is better straight,And A450The color level is better,Shooting at nightA450 is stronger,High-end D800E will not participate in bullying entry machines。

I think the key depends on whether you need to upgrade the lens and body in the future, and what brand your friends around you use.

If you're not planning to upgrade the lens and body, Sony is also good.

But if you still consider adding lenses in the future, it's best to use Canon's, and the other 60d and now 600d, 650d is just one more shoulder screen, if you don't think about good looks, buy 650d, if you really want to buy a mid-range SLR or 7d, reliable.

Sony's quality is recognized, and I feel that A65M and Canon's 60D are better than A65M.

Sony A77 is very good, if you don't think others think you are unprofessional, you can choose Sony. If you want to be professional, Nikon is still reliable.

Of course, the 60d is good, and Canon beats Sony in the field of cameras. And in the later upgrades, Canon has more space.

60d is recommended if there is no advantage

A580 is a previous generation product, 600D is a relatively new product, in terms of product generation difference, you should choose a new one, because of the new technology.

But the A580** is so cheap that it's worth giving up new technologies and products for the price difference.

In addition, Canon lenses are relatively easy to buy, the types of high, medium and low-end lenses are relatively complete, Sony's lenses will be much less in electronic stores, and most of the lenses are medium and high-end, **There are fewer cost-effective lenses with good low performance. In terms of lens selection, the Sony is a bit worse than the Canon.

Finally, Sony users are much smaller than Canon users, and it may be slightly difficult to find movie friends who share the same hobbies.

My suggestion: if you fancy the cheapness, and do not plan to have a strong desire for development in photography in the future, then choose A580, with a small investment; If you're interested in performance, want to delve deeper into photography, make friends, and have a budget, choose the 600D.

First, Canon 600D is now only about 200 yuan more expensive than 550D, considering the functions of flipping screen, wireless flash, etc., this money is very worth spending. So I think all users who are thinking about 550D should think about 600D.

Second, I don't think the word value for money makes any sense when used in the field of cameras. One of the famous sayings in the photography circle: you get what you pay for, two dimes and two cents, and three dollars and three cents. Price and performance are never proportional, only what you want, you are almost the same as money.

Thirdly, the word color is very, very subjective and is entirely a matter of personal preference. Moreover, the color of the canon is neutral, which is suitable for self-adjustment to find characteristics. If you just use the camera defaults and don't choose the Canon, it's a waste.

Fourth, SLR is a big hole, a system that needs to be thrown into it with a lot of time, energy, money, and a lot of cost. If it's just home photography, high-end DC is more suitable for people who pursue picture quality. If it's just Liangsao, what else is worth showing in this year's SLR?

Uncle and aunt have one each. If you want to be bright, play double reverse, and kill all the little Lori in seconds immediately

Sony can't compare, SLR is only good at Canon and Nikon, and the rest is a waste of money!! Canon 550D has the best cost performance among the entry-level machines, so choose him!!

Note that the camera must not play Sony's, whoever plays will be fooled.

The color can be adjusted, it should be thick and thick, and it should be light if you want it. It's not that complicated at all.

I have a blog post about the comparison between the A580 and the 550D, the main difference between the A580 and the A560 is the pixels, and the other aspects are similar.

Actually, they are all good cameras, it depends on personal preference.

I have a lot of blogs**, all of which I shot with Sony SLR (the most expensive lens is 6000 yuan, mainly using a 2000 yuan level lens).I use what many people say"Unprofessional""Garbage""Fooled"SLR, still quite satisfied.

Suggest the A580, and when you want to buy a 35mm cheap prime focus, you will regret buying the Canon. Sony's few cheap prime fins do a good job. PS I have played with Sony's first camera until now, and I have also used various cameras, and the difference between Sony and Canon is very small now, but Sony's 35 is really cost-effective.

Sony's three major elements are really good.

Personally, I think it's still better than Canon.

To correct a mistake, the 60D positioning is not mid-range, but the high-end entry is in the same gear as the 580. And although the A77 is not out, the 60D can be compared with the A77?