Philosophical Topics Can Science Handle or Explain Everything

No, you can't. For example, Chinese medicine and qigong are phenomena that science cannot explain.

Science can find laws, but not laws (personal opinion) The political book says that according to the inherent conditions, create some conditions to explain some phenomena, such as auxiliary lines in mathematics, I think science is like auxiliary lines, human beings use science to understand the world and transform the world, but not all auxiliary lines are useful, some auxiliary lines are not used well or cumbersome, and science is like this.

Ji Xianlin, a master of Chinese studies, disagrees with the idea that Western scientific people will conquer the sky, so we have now put forward the traditional philosophy of the East, that is, the harmonious coexistence of human beings and nature.

Science here deserves to be natural science)

What is called science, the process of human cognition is called science, there are right and wrong to know, and there are also those who cannot know, and more is that there is no qualification to know at all, just like a bird cannot think about how gravity is generatedSo so-called science is just what we think is right. Who knows the truth?

Even if the smartest person in the world thinks it's right, he's not necessarily right. What science thinks is right, and it doesn't have to be. It can be superficial, or even wrong.

Superstitious science is a doom to philosophy.

You can't do everything with known science, otherwise, why would we need so many research institutes and academies for science? But what exists objectively can be studied scientifically. Traditional Chinese medicine and qigong cannot yet figure it out, but it must have its laws in it, and its laws are not unpredictable, and one day it will inevitably be scientifically studied.

God cannot accept scientific research that means it does not exist.

If one day, we discover that the god Wukong, the Jade Emperor, and Zeus of Yama all exist, will science be overthrown? No, science has not been overturned, but has been further developed. Knowing that, I think you understand the role of science.

Science is just an ordinary noun, but it represents wisdom and civilization, progress and development, everything in the world has its natural cause, it is not science that explains the problem, but wisdom! Nature is full of mysteries, and there are many things that cannot be explained by science, but it should be said that human knowledge is not enough to explain them. This is to be clarified, it's not that you won't get a perfect score, but that there are things that you haven't learned or mastered yet!

Science can introduce all the facts that objectively exist, it just depends on whether you have that level or not.

But the illusory world is difficult to say, for example, the changes in people's inner world are difficult to explain with general scientific theories.

Science can only make society progress, but it cannot dominate all existence.

Science is the foundation, it can explain the material world, and what is outside the material is left to philosophy.

Ricky Gervais can make you laugh. The movie "Titanic" can make you cry. René Descartes can make you say aha.

Scientifically, these are just physiological, psychological, and biological responses to a particular **.

Humor, storytelling, and philosophy are not topics that we often discuss in science class because we have other hidden ruler classes dedicated to them. To be good at them, basic science is not so important.

It doesn't matter, because the ability to laugh, cry, and understand is something we carry with us. We don't need to know how they work because they're already working and we're applying them all the time. In this sense, it's like the philosophy of science is a philosophical topic, not a scientific one.

This is not a prerequisite for mixing compounds and making them flourish.

it. That's what really brings a family together. It's not "We love each other!" It's 'him.'" Louis ck

It's funny, it's sad, and it's sensible. We can feel the humor, the tragedy, and the meaning. These are physical reactions to intelligence.

There is something embedded in our biobiological abilities that allows us to experience these things. To analyze this further, we will delve into neuroscience, epistemology, and linguistics.

But in addition to the science of the physical inner workings of these mental devices that we seem to be born with, there is also the science of the craft itself. For science is nothing but the collection, preservation, and generation of facts – facts are objective truths backed by evidence.

Comedy is the science that makes people laugh. To do this, comedians have proven jokes, as well as comedic tools that can be used to generate funny jokes.

Storytelling is a science that allows people to experience the imagination of others. To do this, a good writer uses language and plot devices to make their stories emotional and engaging.

Philosophy is the science that clarifies what makes sense. To do this, a good philosopher needs to write in a language that readers can understand, and somehow make them learn what they don't know – or don't know what they know.

I should have known that something was wrong with my first wife. When I brought her home to meet her parents, they approved of her," — Woody Allen.

If it makes you laugh, it's a hilarious drama. If it makes you cry, it's a tragedy. If it makes perfect sense, it's philosophy.

I think, therefore I am. —René Descartes.

It makes perfect sense. That doesn't mean it's been scientifically proven. But it's already got you to agree. This is the science of philosophy.

Philosophy can explain everything, but not all conclusions are true.

Some scientists have examined things that are difficult for science to explain from a philosophical perspective, and have successfully made scientific explanations, drawn scientific conclusions, and promoted the development of science.

1. The way in which philosophy guides the development of concrete sciences is not that of philosophers guiding scientists.

2. The way in which philosophy guides the development of concrete science is that scientists consciously look at problems from the correct viewpoint of philosophy, and solve problems with the fundamental methods of philosophy and the specific methods of science.

3. There are many outstanding scientists who are philosophically literate and affirm the important role of philosophy after they have achieved significant scientific research results, including Albert Einstein in foreign countries and Li Siguang in China.

Of course, copy is not, and there are many counter-examples from intuitive experience. For example, many diseases and doctors are helpless, and science cannot solve those urgent environmental and energy problems.

But there are also many schools of philosophy, and from this point of view, there are schools of thought that what cannot be explained now can finally be explained in the future, such as Hegel's philosophy; Some argue that our ordinary understanding cannot know the essence of this world, and that we must use other means, such as Buddhist philosophy and Chinese Taoist philosophy; Others argue that we have no knowledge of the world at all, such as the outright skepticism of the ancient Greek Pilang; There is also the belief that we can only understand and explain the world within a certain range of knowledge, beyond which we cannot and cannot have any understanding, such as Kant's philosophy, and I think analytic philosophy also has this tendency; Finally, if you think that the explanation is not clear, you can't say whether it can be explained clearly, but first calm down, such as Husserl's phenomenology.

Personally, I understand, I don't know, at least I certainly don't agree with Hegel and Pilange. The reason why philosophy is philosophy is also that it is not a problem, it is a difficult problem, and there can be no definite standard answer.

Science can not have the ability to explain anything in the world.

Since the great self-consciousness is not created by man, it is the genus of human beings.

Everything in life is something that nature has been around for a long time. Human science can only be the means of discovering, describing, imitating, and using the laws of nature, and science has no ability to create, eliminate, change, and explain the laws of nature, in other words, the laws described by science are the laws of nature that have existed for a long time. Human beings, through their (limited) knowledge of nature, verify the facts they have discovered with bold assumptions and careful scientific thinking.

Therefore, scientific experiments must adhere to three principles: double-blind (the experimenter and the experimented person do not know each other, to prevent collusion and cheating) A large number of examples confirm that comparison with the control is indispensable.

Is it possible? There are so many things that cannot be explained by science, otherwise there would be no market for philosophy and theology.

Yes, just like the so-called unknowable phenomena in philosophy, it is just that it is difficult to prove in the current science (high school two-person version compulsory 4 life and philosophy) Specifically, you can refer to agnosticism and agnosticism.

Both ontology and epistemology belong to one of the most fundamental and pure philosophical questions.

To put it simply, the question of what the universe is is called an ontological problem, for example, Ma Zheli believes that matter is primary, and the Chinese Five Elements Theory believes that metal, wood, water, fire, and earth are this"Ontology"

The study of whether human thinking can completely objectively and accurately reflect the world, and whether the world can eventually be known by people, is called epistemology.

So don't just look at Ma Zhe and think it's philosophy, don't you think those obscure theories are reversed, you are confused? That's called dogmatism, and Ma Zhe is just a part of the general system of philosophy, not the ultimate truth.

In addition, the essence of Ma Zhe's thought is actually just two words, materialism and practice, why should you study it yourself. As for Marcher also called dialectical materialism, I think that dialectics is not the patent of Marcus Ger, first of all, dialectics is the first German classical philosophy, especially Hegel. Dialectic, in our Chinese language, is the harmony of yin and yang, which existed in the Book of Changes thousands of years ago.

I really can't get used to those people who mislead the landlord by memorizing dogma.,It doesn't mean that I'm right.,I hope the landlord can understand some truth.。

Marx's philosophy includes three aspects: dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and dialectical materialist epistemology, and I can tell you that dialectics is definitely not epistemology.

Dialectics deals with the problem of the laws of the movement of matter. For example, the principles of universal connection, mutual change of quality, negation of negation, etc.

Epistemology, on the other hand, talks about the laws of human understanding of the world. For example, the second leap in understanding, practice is the only criterion for testing truth, etc.

Therefore, it is completely wrong to say on the Internet that dialectics is epistemology.

(1) Dialectical materialism (matter, consciousness, law).

2) Materialist dialectics.

3) The epistemology of dialectical materialism.

Correct option A. Analysis: "Knowing people is philosopher" from "Shu Gao Sui Sedan Chair Tao Mo":

The first ode to knowing people is philosopher, capable officials. It means to be wise to be able to discern a person's moral conduct and talents. This is about how to achieve "philosophy".

B and C are both talking about the role of philosophers. d is the concept of philosophy.

Philosophy is the truth by its own understanding, and it is not credible to believe what the ancients said.

Choose c: Each person is like a bright moon, he presents the bright side, but there is another dark side that is never seen by others.

This sentence shows the two sides of things, and these two sides (light and dark) are contradictory to each other.

Answer. A As a metaphor, society is compared to a ship, and there is no contradiction between it and people, and there is no contradiction in this sentence.

b Believing and not believing are two sides of the contradiction, and at the same time the lack of friendship and being deceived constitute the primary and secondary aspects of the contradiction, which was not dealt with in the original title.

cWalking slowly and wandering, which is a manifestation of the two-sided nature of things, embodies the contradictory opposition to each other, and is in line with the original theme.

D, potential, blessed, cheap, smart, list different aspects, and have nothing to do with the problem of contradictions.

Except for B, it is a kind of life attitude that is needed in life.