My girlfriend didn t pass the special post interview, and I feel very uncomfortable, how can I persu

Interviews and interrogations.

come, although they all give people a condescending feeling. But the two are fundamentally different. The interviewer gives some questions to get the candidate's attitude or coping method.

The test is emotional intelligence, IQ. And the person being interrogated is often a person who has made a mistake or violated the law, and is completely in a passive state. In the face of strong interrogators, the only way to deal with them is to be cautious and prudent.

How these two are linked to emotional troubles.

The interview scene is very serious, and some even look like prisoners, mainly for two reasons:

Second, it is also to examine the mental quality to see if it can maintain a normal state under pressure.

An interview is a face-to-face interview to ask your questions, while an interrogation is an interrogation by a public security officer of a person who has committed a crime.

First, it is difficult for the free time of both sides to match, especially sometimes the candidates have not left, and the company is very busy, so it often leads to the time of both sides often not matching, and it is necessary to constantly coordinate the time of both sides, and have been asking and coordinating, and finally both sides are a little impatient, I didn't expect such a simple thing to make me anxious. Once the general manager of the enterprise wanted to interview a candidate in person, but the general manager himself often traveled, and once he was ready to arrange a candidate to go to the company for an interview, but the general manager had to go abroad for half a month, and when he finally came back, the candidate had already gone to work in another company. Later, the leader told me a method, which is quite effective, as long as in the recommendation report, write a few candidates to choose from the interview time points for Party A to choose, or let Party A provide a few alternative interview time points for candidates to choose.

Second, the candidate agrees to the interview and temporarily regrets being a headhunter for a long time, and it will be found that this situation is very common, it may be that the candidate's family does not agree to change jobs, or it may be that the candidate has changed his mind after learning other information, and there may be some objective reasons: such as time problems. In fact, most of the problems that arise are due to the fact that the trust between the headhunting consultant and the candidate has not been fully established.

Makes the candidate question or waver. If the consultant has gained the full trust of the candidate, he will take the initiative to communicate his doubts with you instead of just releasing the pigeons.

In this case, try to find out the crux of the problem, solve the problem as much as possible, help the candidate answer his doubts, and make another appointment if it is for objective reasons. Of course, the best way is to strengthen the relationship with the candidate to avoid this from happening.

3. The interview was unsuccessful, but there was a dispute because of the travel fee, which appeared in a foreign customer, and he had never encountered such a problem at that time, so he did not pay attention to this detail. At that time, after the interview, Party A felt that the candidate was not very suitable, and after a few days, the candidate asked me to go to Party A to reimburse his travel expenses, a total of more than 2,000. However, the client thinks that the candidate should bear the travel expenses himself.

At that time, I was entangled in this issue for a long time, and I offended people on both sides.

Since then, when I encounter an interview in a foreign country, I will definitely ask who will bear the travel expenses, so as to avoid similar situations again.

Regarding the headhunter to arrange the interview, before the interview, it is necessary to give the candidate interview counseling and try to avoid unnecessary problems. Headhunters must do a good job of coordination, whether it is the time of both parties, or the problems that are likely to occur during the interview, or the follow-up development after the interview, they must try to control it as much as possible.

1.It's hard to get a job with this kind of mentality, and the interviewer feels that you can't do it for a long time, and you just use it as a springboard, and of course you won't want it

2.It doesn't matter if the major is right or not, an office assistant like you can do anything professional3If you want to find a dream job, even if you and the company think differently, it's best to go with the company, after all, the probability of hitting it off is not very high.

4.Your reluctance to stay at the grassroots level for a long time is also a hard injury, the examiner will test whether you are willing to do the grassroots for a long time from all aspects, you can quickly improve if you do well, but if you do not do well, you can only maintain the status quo, there is a saying called hope for the best, prepare for the worstIf you say that you have only been working at the grassroots level for one year, then if you leave the company after a year without getting promoted for some reason, imagine how this impatient person can do a good job as an assistant?

Your contact with her is when you join and leave the company, and the rest basically has nothing to do with her. See if you can stand it.

It is her job to contact new recruits, and it is easy for a person to be emotional when working, which reflects the unpleasant working environment to a certain extent. Even the personal affairs are bad, and I think the other positions may be about the same. I think you'd better think about it.

It's your wrong way of doing things, since the interview has passed, you can observe when you report to the company, and then ask when you don't understand, you treat the personnel department as a questioning department, who wants to talk to you in **, don't bother it.

Hello, you go straight to it.

If you can admit it, you will be admitted

There is also a lot of pressure on the HR department.

If you ask too much, they will be annoyed.

You'd better not go to this kind of company.

The so-called human resources department or personnel department is in most units. It's just a department that pays attendance and payroll.

In units with standardized management, it is usually impossible for the personnel department to scold people at will.

Is it a small company?

If it's a small company, it's better not to go, but if it's hard to find a job, you can go to work first and then find another job.

I feel why only I know, in fact, I really don't want to do those people who are annoying to the process, maybe the things you asked have also been aimed at his meaning, after all, people are personnel management, since it is such an unbeautiful process, it should be better to take a shower!

Hello, friend!

With such a lack of quality personnel, I feel that the company is not much better, and I personally recommend not to go.

There is no shortage of annoying ones in the company, and if you choose not to go just because of this, it's not worth it.

It can only show that the other party has no quality, ignore it!

If there is time. I suggest that the landlord exercise, if you have the strength, you are not afraid of no one to love.

Explain the reason directly, and people will be interested in checking your information casually.

So don't talk about the situation!

==、How do you feel like an elementary school student? I advise you not to go. Find a job in the provincial capital and do it first, and plan the direction of struggle. When the certificate comes down, I will officially go to fight!