Isn t there a unified standard answer to the logic of the management joint entrance examination?

There are different explanations and methods for logical problems, as long as they are within the reasonable range of explanations for the correct answers, they are all possible!

The logical learning of the management joint entrance examination is a step-by-step process, first of all, we must master the rules of question types, and then study the method of solving the questions, and contact relevant reminders to achieve practice makes perfect, and draw inferences from one example. The following is a list of the seven question types of the Logic Common Test for the Joint Entrance Examination for Management.

1.relationships between concepts;

2.Truth value judgment;

3.inferred;

4.form comparison;

5.argument type;

6.Strengthened weakened type;

7.Causal type.

For the relevant exams of the management joint examination, you can consult the social science Sais.

Since its establishment 19 years ago, Saiss Education has helped students realize their dreams of graduate school in the whole process of postgraduate counseling, compilation of teaching and auxiliary materials, teaching and teaching affairs, etc.

With excellent teachers in the industry, scientific and reasonable curriculum system, rigorous teaching service concept and good relationship between colleges and universities, we have helped tens of thousands of students to be successfully admitted to famous universities including Tsinghua University and Peking University, as well as many national, industrial and regional famous universities, which not only helps students realize their dreams of graduate school, but also promotes the development of graduate education in China and the improvement of the overall level of graduate students to a certain extent.

Today's social science SASS has a clear strategy and clear goals, and is moving forward on the road of providing students with complete solutions and tutoring systems such as graduate planning and tutoring! We firmly believe that adhering to the mission of "serving talents and accompanying you to grow", Social Science Saiss is not only the cradle of your dreams, but also a platform for lifelong benefits! We are determined to build Social Science Saiss into a great and respected education company!

399 Management Joint Examination Comprehensive Ability] covers the following test contents: mathematics, logic, writing 2 questions for national master's students, including 30 points for argument validity analysis, 35 points for argumentative essays, a total of 65 points Now due to the time of the joint entrance examination.

There is no fixed scoring answer for the management joint examination, which is the standard answer, and there will be several controversial questions every year.

with"English II"Two subjects with a total score of 300 points.

1) Comprehensive ability of management joint examination, paper structure: mathematics, logical reasoning.

Writing (argument validity analysis, argument essay, a total of three parts. The maximum score is 200 points.

Score distribution: 75 points for Mathematics (15 questions for problem solving, 10 questions for condition sufficiency judgment, 3 points for each question), 60 points for Logical Reasoning (30 questions, 2 points for each question), and 65 points for Writing (30 points for 1 question of argument validity analysis + 35 points for 1 question of argumentative essay).

2) English II, Roll Structure: Use of language knowledge (i.e. cloze in the blanks.

There are four parts in the first part of reading comprehension, one article in the second part of reading comprehension, translation (English to Chinese), small essays, and large essays, a total of six parts. The maximum score is 100 points.

Score distribution: 10 points for 20 questions on the use of knowledge in large language (cloze in the blanks), 40 points for 20 questions in reading comprehension (Part A), 10 points for 5 questions in reading and imitation comprehension (Part B), 15 points for translation (English to Chinese), 10 points for small composition, and 15 points for large composition.

Exam format: multiple-choice questions.

Suggested target: 44'-46'

Zhonggong managers believe that to learn any new thing, we must first understand its outline and body shape, and then go deep into blocks and break through each one.

MBA Review Advice (Focus).

It is not recommended to do more than 3 sets of mock questions, mainly considering the uneven level of logic questions outside the questions, and it will be counterproductive if you choose poorly. First choose the questions of the previous years, and review carefully and profoundly after each set, whether it is right or wrong, you must "plate", and try to find the plate to which they belong for each question.

Sufficient attention should be paid to the logic of argumentation. It is closely related to the analysis of the validity of the argument in the writing section. In this part of the study, students will be proficient in various argumentation methods, such as analogical argumentation, inductive argumentation, generalization, etc., and then combine test questions to deepen their understanding of various argumentation methods and what argumentation methods can be used to refute others' views; When you want to prove yourself, what methods can you use to strengthen your opinion? What kind of methods do you use to explain or evaluate seemingly contradictory phenomena?

Personally, I think we can compare argumentative reasoning to proof problems in mathematics, where geometry and numbers are proved, while logic is the proof of words and their meanings.

After the above review, a second round of review can be carried out in order to improve. The second round of review is mainly to feel the structure and thinking of the logic course after a round of experience of doing problems. Some people find that the gap between logical review and non-review is not too much, and it is not too much difference between reviewing twice and reviewing once, and sometimes it is not too bad if you don't advance or retreat.

I have this experience myself, and in one year, I scored 58 points for the first time and 52 points for the second time, but despite this, I still recommend that it is best to review twice, because there is not much difference between revision and non-review, which is almost always at 40'-44'If you want to do well and be stable, you either have good logic by nature, or you still have to prepare steadily and understand deeply.

In the final stage, you don't have to brush up on a lot of logic, just do the right amount of questions to maintain the sense of the question. It's not like quantity has to be a lot of formulas, it's important to understand.

Regarding the preparation materials, I have sorted out and shared them in detail, and here I will talk about the logical preparation materials and usage opinions separately.

Exam question: The most precious textbook, there is no one. Please take each set of questions seriously, and it is recommended to brush the questions 2-3 times. I personally did it 2 times.

MBA Logic Test Method.

Formal logic circles logical conjunctions, text to symbols, and quickly solves problems.

Analytical reasoning is time-consuming, it is recommended to use the elimination method first, and if the elimination method cannot be used, leave it until the end of the whole test paper.

The review method is a three-step process.

According to the syllabus, the logic test does not assess professional knowledge of logic, but focuses on the candidate's ability to understand, analyze and refine various information, especially the ability to identify, support, refute and make various inferences. Therefore, the logic questions of the management joint examination are not very difficult.

After reading the real questions of the management joint entrance examination, it is not difficult to find that the real questions of the management joint examination actually test the speed of problem solving, which also points out the direction for our review. The questions in the Typology Training Logic Exam are very flexible, focusing on the examination of the ability to comprehensively apply knowledge and solve problems, and the problem-solving skills can only be truly consolidated and improved through repeated practice.

If you want to get a high score on the logic exam, you need to conduct typological training. Based on the best classification of question types, the corresponding problem solving methods are extracted according to the main characteristics of different question types.

Students should try their best to analyze the characteristics of each question type and the method of solving the problem thoroughly, constantly summarize and summarize, and achieve a thorough understanding and inference in the practice.

3. Contact bypass. Summarize and refine.

The focus of the logic test is clear, and the way of asking questions is relatively fixed. One of the most effective ways for candidates to improve their scores is to refine past papers.

The refinement of past questions is to repeatedly do real questions and train according to the type of questions, so as to fully grasp the proposition rules of various question types and gradually cultivate the feeling of doing questions.

The questions must be based on the basic knowledge of logic taught by the teacher, and must not be done in your own way.

If students review solidly and do the questions seriously in the summer, not only can the speed of doing the questions be improved, but also the grades will also have a qualitative leap.

Effective revision must focus on repeating the problem and constantly summarizing the solution ideas. Exam training.

In logic review, past papers are the best choice. Logic learning can only be talked about after mastering the basic knowledge and achieving a certain amount of questions. The practice of bringing knowledge with skills is a tree without roots and a source of water.

Studying past papers is a necessary effort to improve your logic score. The quality of the real questions is higher than any of the questions, and it is necessary for us to accurately grasp the logic test by training our skills with the real questions, forming our own solution methods in the real questions, and finding the future proposition rules in the real questions.

However, the number of past questions is limited after all, so students must master the basic knowledge and various question types and solution methods before brushing the past questions

Since 1997, the comprehensive logic exam has been taken for 26 years. At present, the subject of logic accounts for a total of 60 points in the exam, and 30 multiple-choice questions are examined. We can see from the following table that the changes in the question types of the exam are 12 years ago, and the analytical reasoning question types began to increase significantly after 13 years, basically about ten questions per year, especially after 19 years, the number of questions in the analytical reasoning exam basically remained at 13 or 14 questions per year.

In recent years, formal logic has been tested less and less, with 3-5 questions per year, and the remaining 10 or so questions are examined for argumentative reasoning. Therefore, formal logic is a trend in the logic exam, and we must attach great importance to this type of question in our later learning process, which is the key to our high score in logic.

Management Joint Entrance Examination Logic.

Logic is 30 multiple-choice questions, each question is worth 2 points, a total of 60 points;

Logic. The logical reasoning part of the comprehensive ability test mainly tests the candidate's understanding, analysis and synthesis of various information, as well as the corresponding logical thinking ability such as judgment, reasoning and argumentation, and does not test the professional knowledge of logic. The questions cover various fields such as nature, society and humanities, but do not test professional knowledge in related fields.

The content of the test questions mainly includes:

a) Concept. 1. Types of concepts.

2. Relationships between concepts.

3. Definitions.

4. Division.

2) Judgment. 1. The type of judgment.

2. The relationship between judgments.

c) Reasoning. 1. Deductive reasoning.

2. Inductive reasoning.

3. Analogical reasoning.

4. Comprehensive reasoning.

4) Argumentation. 1. Analysis of argumentation methods.

2. Demonstration and evaluation.

1) Strengthen. 2) Weakened.

3) Explanation. 4) Miscellaneous.

3. Fallacy identification.

1) Confusing concepts.

2) Shift the topic.

3) Self-contradiction.

4) Ambiguity.

5) Improper analogies.

6) Partial generalization.

7) Other fallacies.

The logic of the management joint examination can be used in the "Analysis of the Comprehensive Ability Examination Syllabus of the Higher Education Version of the Entrance Examination Syllabus of the Higher Education Examination, MBA, MPA, MPACC management joint examination", which is compiled by the Expert Committee of the National Management Joint Examination Syllabus Supporting Textbooks. The X000D Management Joint Examination is a unified proposition by the Examination Center of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. The Joint Entrance Examination for Management includes the Comprehensive Ability Test and the English Test.

Among them, logic accounts for 60 points in the comprehensive ability test. The proportion is still relatively large. x000d If you want to review the logic of the management joint entrance examination, you can go to the social science race to learn about it.

The teaching and research team of Social Science Saiss has personally written and cooperated with Tsinghua University Press, Machinery Industry Press and other well-known publishing institutions to publish a series of books such as management joint examination, economics joint examination, master's public courses, professional courses, interview (re-examination) guidance, etc., including "Management and Economics Joint Entrance Examination Writing High Score Breakthrough", "Management and Economics Joint Entrance Examination Logic Decisive 1000 Questions", "MPACC Re-examination High Score Guide", "MBA Interview High Score Guidance", etc. Some books have filled the gap of books in the domestic industry and become the bestsellers of related products, which are well received by teachers and students. X000D In addition, Social Science Saiss also offers MBA MEM MPA EMBA MPACC and other management joint entrance examinations interview coaching and written exam coaching, offline teaching + synchronous recording and broadcasting of online courses.

Hello, if you need to use books for the joint entrance examination for management, you can go directly to the official website to check the corresponding books, which may be sold.

What book to use for the logic of the management joint entrance examination This book should also be available on the Internet, anyway, you have to use a professional book.

The logic of the management exam needs to buy some economic books to study.

If you think about it logically, I think the best way is to find a way to solve it.

There are a lot of management techniques, what books should be used, and I personally think it should be the application of logical thinking.

What book is used for the logic of the joint entrance examination, and the management of the joint entrance examination should be selected according to his multifaceted words.

There is technology, what books are used? If you want to use this management logic, you should use relevant books.

The joint entrance examination for management refers to the unified entrance examination for master's degree students in management majors. It includes two subjects: the management comprehensive ability test and the English test. The comprehensive ability paper for management includes three modules: mathematics, logical reasoning, and writing, and the question type is borrowed from the American GMAT test (American Graduate Record Examination for Business and Management).

Management Joint Entrance Examination Subjects: Including "Management Joint Examination Comprehensive Ability" and "English II", with a total score of 300 points.

1) Comprehensive ability of the joint examination for management, paper structure: mathematics, logical reasoning, writing (argumentation validity analysis, argumentative essay), a total of three parts. The maximum score is 200 points.

Score distribution: 75 points for Mathematics (15 questions for problem solving, 10 questions for condition sufficiency judgment, 3 points for each question), 60 points for Logical Reasoning (30 questions, 2 points for each question), and 65 points for Writing (30 points for 1 question of argument validity analysis + 35 points for 1 question of argumentative essay).

2) English II, volume structure: use of language knowledge (i.e., cloze in the blank), reading and comprehension of the first part of the four articles, reading comprehension of the second part of the article, translation (English to Chinese), small omission composition, large composition, a total of six parts. The maximum score is 100 points.

Score distribution: 10 points for 20 questions on the use of language knowledge (cloze in the blanks), 40 points for 20 questions on reading comprehension (part a), 10 points for 5 questions on reading comprehension (part b), 15 points for translation (English to Chinese), 10 points for small composition, and 15 points for large composition.