What kind of situation will society be like if fertility is fully opened?

People's perceptions have also changed a lot. It can increase the labor force for the family. However, now people pay more and more attention to the quality of childbirth, that is, to give children a good life, good educational conditions, and a good medical environment after they are born.

For most young people, when it comes to the topic of "having children", many couples will be ostracized, and in the face of the current situation, many couples choose to have only one child. Due to the increase in population aging, the decrease in newborns, and the decrease in women of childbearing age, the current Chinese population is also facing a crisis and <>

Although the introduction of "childbirth" policies such as extended maternity leave, childbirth**, and subsidies by relevant institutions has not achieved obvious results, many couples are still indifferent and do not want to have more children. What the hell is going on? For most office workers, the cost of living is very high, coupled with the cost of raising children, the financial pressure on ordinary families is still relatively large.

Coupled with housing financing and car loans, there is little money to raise children. Secondly, industry insiders pointed out that this may be the reason why some young couples are reluctant to have many children. In the past, people's concepts were relatively backward, and the standard of living was relatively low, and in areas with relatively backward economies in general, the number of family births was relatively high.

With the improvement of people's cultural level, many people's perceptions have also changed, which is why they only want to raise one child. But for civilians, in the face of such high life pressure, most people do not want to have many children. From another point of view, even if childbearing is completely liberalized, there are not many families who really want to have many children.

If people want to have two children, there will be some changes in society as well. People want to have more children when their incomes rise and they can raise more children. But there will also be other changes, such as population growth, housing prices will be **.

As we all know, there is also a certain relationship between the rate of population growth and the rate of housing price growth.

If the total population of the society rises, the demand for houses will rise sharply, and the housing prices will also be affected by the relationship between supply and demand. Therefore, industry insiders pointed out that if domestic housing prices skyrocket again in the future, the domestic population will increase rapidly. With the increase in the number of children in China, child-related industries will also usher in rapid growth in the education industry, infants and young children.

These child-related industries are likely to see massive growth. However, these industries also mean that people's incomes have increased greatly with rapid growth, or that the cost of education at home has fallen.

I feel that even if it is open now, there are still very few people who are willing to have a second child or a third child, because the pace of life is very fast now, and the pressure of work is also very high. And today's young people are all educated people, so there is no concept of raising children to prevent old age as before.

Probably about the same as it is now. The release of the second child has not led to a significant increase in the fertility rate, and even if it is fully liberalized, many families cannot afford the current cost of raising children.

What if you don't let go? There are seven or eight babies in the far away place of the Tiangao Emperor, is it allowed by the policy? People don't need a marriage certificate, a birth permit, or a household registration, and all those born are still human.

If fertility is fully opened up and the current state of annual fertility reduction is maintained, nothing will change. Because today's young people are pursuing eugenics, and raising a child will have a lot of economic pressure and mental pressure, and it is really impossible to raise more children.

40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80 people are born between 16 million and 25 million per year, and will die in the next 30 years from 2020. According to the average annual birth population of 20 million in 40 years, according to 4050 2%, 5060 50%, 6070 70%, 7080 95%, the surviving population in 2020 is 100 million, 1.4 billion people, minus more than 100 million billion, in the next 50 years, 2020 will prevail, the first 28 years (2020 into the childbearing period), each family will only have 1 child per year, and the population will be 100 million in the next 28 years (according to the average annual birth of 8 million couples, at least 100 million + 100 million = 100 million in 50 years. give birth to 2 children, and the population will be 100 million + 100 million = 100 million after 50 years; Giving birth to a child, 100 million + 100 million = 100 million.

It is a foreseeable and certain fact that the impact of the full liberalization of childbirth on society is almost zero.

If it is fully liberalized, those who work hard work harder, because they have to raise a baby.

Isn't marketization a substitute for patting the brain?

Is this a problem that can be solved by open questions? Expectant mothers are decreasing year by year, who has ever seen that men can have children, and what is the use of having more men?

Legal analysis: The two-child policy is a policy announced at the Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. It is a birth policy that corresponds to the family planning policy implemented by China to deal with China's aging population and imbalance in population proportion.

In October 2015, the Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China decided to fully liberalize the two-child policy. At this point, the one-child policy, which has been implemented for more than 30 years, is officially announced. As long as they are legal couples, they have the right to have a second child, and they are no longer restricted by the "single second child" policy or the "double single second child" policy.

Legal basis: Article 9 of the Population and Family Planning Law of the People's Republic of China*** prepares population development plans and incorporates them into the national economic and social development plan. In accordance with the national population chain development plan and the population development plan of the people at the next higher level, the people at or above the county level shall formulate the population development plan of their respective administrative region in accordance with the actual local conditions, and include it in the national economic and social development plan.

Article 10 The people at and above the county level shall, in accordance with the population development plan, formulate population and family planning implementation plans and organize their implementation. The people's family planning administrative departments at or above the county level are responsible for the day-to-day work of implementing the population and family planning implementation plan. The people's offices of townships, ethnic townships, and towns and urban sub-districts are responsible for population and family planning work within their respective jurisdictions, and implement the population and family planning implementation plans.

Article 18: The State encourages a couple to have two children. Article 23 The State shall reward couples who practice family planning in accordance with regulations. Article 24 The State shall establish and improve social security systems such as basic old-age insurance, basic medical insurance, maternity insurance, and social welfare, and promote family planning.

The State encourages insurance companies to organize insurance programs that are conducive to family planning. Localities with conditions can implement various forms of old-age security measures in rural areas according to the principle of first-class guidance and farmers' voluntariness.

If fertility is fully liberalized, then I think the fertility rate will still increase to some extent. But if we only release the fertility rate and do not take other measures, it will certainly not increase it much. If you want to have a higher fertility rate, you first need to have policy benefits to match, such as providing some maternity allowances and the like.

Then it is necessary to improve the environment in China, so that the pressure on the people will be lower, so that there will be more thoughts on having children. As long as the above series of combination punches can be knocked down, then the improvement of fertility can be expected.

Slightly raised

As mentioned earlier, if it is only a simple comprehensive liberalization of childbearing, but there are no supporting measures, then people will definitely not have many children. Only those who are relatively wealthy, or those who prefer to raise children, will rise more. Nowadays, many people do not have children not because the country's fertility rate cannot be released, but because many people do not want their first child.

If you don't want the first child, it is useless to have a second child, a third child, or a full release. <>

Policy benefits

If we want to increase people's fertility rate, the first thing is that there must be corresponding benefits in the policy to encourage people to have children. The reason why people are reluctant to have children is because they feel that having children is too expensive. In this case, if people can be given a maternity allowance and can receive a certain amount of money every month after raising a child, then naturally more people will be willing to raise a child, because there is not much pressure to raise a child.

In addition to maternity allowances, some public and free kindergartens can also be built, and some low-cost nursery schools can also be set up. <>

Environmental improvement

In addition to providing better conditions for children, it is also necessary to give these parents a better environment. China has a very large population and fierce competition, so people are thinking about careers, and the issue of children seems to be put aside. If we can give people more holidays and give people a more relaxed atmosphere, then we can definitely improve the fertility rate as well.

Full liberalization has little impact on fertility, but it should be a little better than no liberalization.

A small number of families are particularly good, and those who like children may have a few more, and most people can only have more than enough energy to complete, and there are very few who can complete the current fertility task.

Personally, I think that even if the fertility is fully opened, the fertility rate will still not increase, and people do not want to have children now, not because they have not let go of childbearing, but because the current cost of living is really too high, and young people do not have so much energy to take care of children, and they are not ready to be parents.

I think the fertility rate will still go down because the problem right now is not open births, but that people can't afford to have children.

There will be a certain improvement. Now many people know that the fertility rate is continuing, and if it continues, it will affect the development of society, and the consequences will be very serious.

"Low fertility" is a good thing for China's national conditions, but do we need "how"? Food is scarce, oil is scarce, water is scarce, minerals are scarce, and the environment is deteriorating. High fertility inevitably leads to ecological collapse and is catastrophic for China.

The only consequence of low fertility is "aging", Japan, Germany, Sweden, France. It has been aging for decades, rich and comfortable, and there is no problem!

There won't be much change, you see that the country now has three children, how many families have three children, I asked a mother of two children, "Can you have three children now, do you still have children?" She refused.

Housing prices are half lower, divorce is held accountable, tuition fees are not paid, and sky-high medical care is removed, everyone can be employed, everyone has an income, and the birth rate will naturally rise.

The key is that I am poor, I can't afford to support myself, like ours, once the grandparents and grandparents are still in the family, once they get married and have children, the elderly in the family have no one to support, although the grandparents and grandparents are in the hands of my parents, but when I was a child, they treated me really well, I can't give no money at all, although my parents are also working, but I still have to give tens of thousands of dollars every year, if I get married, all the money can only raise children, there is no extra money to give to the family, if you give it, you may be blamed by your in-laws, why bother.

There is no baby in the world, and it is fully opened, as if some preferential policies have been given, even if there is no real money and silver encouragement, there is no result, because it is too difficult to raise children. Now people are too realistic, in this society, those who have money can choose to have more children, and those who don't have money can choose not to have children, and the crux of the problem is here.

The conditions are not good, and it is useless to open up and marry two wives. Without real money**, the fertility rate will always be low.

Single births should be open. In this way, fertility can be increased. Nowadays, girls are not happy to get married. Because after marriage, men overturn too much.

This year, there is no eighteen classes of martial arts or don't have children, it's too tiring, if you don't say anything else, you can toss you to death if you go to school, all kinds of miscellaneous things every day, not to mention how much money you have, you can't have time and energy, unless you have someone to help you, otherwise don't be too tired.

It won't be high, it's too hard to make money now. The cost of children is too high.

As long as the "energy is transferred to productivity", the fertility rate will naturally rise!

A low fertility rate is poor, and the more you have children, the poorer you get.

In the past, others often said that you would not be born if you were released! Now it's happening! It's still the same!

The cost is too high! In addition to paying money to the state, you also have to pay the landlord for tea! How much does it cost?

It's impossible to be born and not be able to learn! Difficult!

Also the second child, the third child! Now there is a popular saying, if you are not afraid of a high salary, you are afraid that there are two schoolbags at home! Pay it today, pay it tomorrow, and all the money you earn goes to school!

The scriptures are fully opened, who gives birth, gives birth to good birth, and raises it? Is it a crime to have an unstable job, an unstable income, and many disasters?

Rich people let go of life, and those who can't afford to raise them still don't want to ......be happyIn this way, the rich will be happy ...... henceforth

It's so difficult to find a job, how many resumes have I submitted, but there is still no information, it's been like this for several months, and it's also difficult to see a doctor, it's half an hour to go at the entrance of the hospital, the epidemic hasn't passed, what should I do if I have a child born with the epidemic.

Is it stupid or not, is it the root of the problem? The root cause is that there is no money, what do you give birth to if you don't get married?

If fertility is fully liberalized now, there will be dozens of younger brothers and sisters.

It's better to buy a few more RVs for a family.

<>I believe that many people will have some of their own views and opinions on this issue, that is, do you think it is necessary for China to fully liberalize population and childbirth?

In fact, I believe that many people have their own ideas about this issue, but for today's society, it is true that the population problem is very serious. After all, China's demographic structure has been seriously shifted. Our country has now entered an aging population.

stage, which is a very serious challenge for our country, if the fertility rate of the population.

If we can't do it again, it will be very difficult for our country to develop in the future. After all, as the future of the country, if there is no supply of new forces, then to a large extent, China's future development will be very difficult. This is why the country has successively opened up the two-child policy.

and the main reason for the three-child policy, but to a certain extent, the opening of the policy has not made this situation very significantly improved, which of course has a lot to do with China's modern social environment.

After all, for China now, there are relatively few families that can choose to raise two children. After all, raising a child is also a relatively difficult "project", not only in the newborn need to carry out a series of pregnancy tests, but also in a certain case, it is also necessary to ensure the child's daily living expenses and some nutritional costs, after the child grows up, but also including the child's tuition fees. Relatively speaking, these consumption is also a very serious challenge for ordinary families, and China's real estate market is also very challenging for young people, which has led to the general decline in China's fertility rate.

I think the state should choose to open up the population and fertility policy.

It is also important to learn more about young people's stress**. So that to a certain extent, you can get the result that the country wants, isn't it?

So to a certain extent, it is actually very necessary to fully open up the population and fertility policy, after all, it can also allow a few wealthy families to contribute some strength to the country, isn't it?