My mother in law has always had us take care of her, and now my sister is fighting with us for real

First of all, this sister should be your husband's sister, and legally, she has the right to inherit your mother-in-law's property and is the legal heir.

Secondly, because your mother-in-law has been supported by you, after a hundred years of the old man's family, the division of property will give you more shares, which has a legal basis.

Again, the law of our country stipulates that testamentary succession is greater than legal inheritance, that is to say, if your mother-in-law makes a will that the house belongs to you, then your sister will not have the right to divide, but please respect the wishes of the old man himself, and the will made by force is invalid.

Hope it helps.

No, if your mother-in-law writes a suicide note, she will follow the suicide note, if not, then your mother-in-law's family property will have a share of your husband and sister's.

It is a legal obligation for adult children to support their parents.

Inheritance is generally divided into statutory and testamentary succession, as well as bequests. In legal inheritance, your lover and your sister are the heirs in the same order, and they will generally inherit in equal proportion when inheriting property, but children who have support for the elderly or people with incomplete civil capacity will inherit more appropriately, and those who have the obligation to support but do not provide support can inherit less or not inherit. Of course, a daughter-in-law who has assumed the obligation of maintenance has the right to inherit appropriately.

Testamentary succession can block legal succession, and in order to prevent family disputes, your mother can make a will voluntarily.

However, I think it's better to settle the matter through family consultation, and there is no need to make relatives turn against each other.

It is the duty of our juniors to take care of the elderly, and as for who owns the property, it will be judged fairly.

No, because this property is not dependent on whether there is maintenance.

It is born from the same root, so why is it too anxious to fry each other.

Probably not, your husband has half of the property rights, and legally it should be half of the person, except in special circumstances, of course.

Yes, it depends on your mother-in-law's wishes.

It is definitely not an advantage, first of all, he has never raised the elderly and is still qualified to ask for real estate, you can sue him through the law, he is also part of the children, and the real estate must also have his share, like he can only share a small part if he does not support the elderly

According to the Inheritance Law, heirs who lack the ability to work who have special difficulties in living shall be taken care of when distributing the inheritance.

Heirs who have fulfilled the main obligation to support the decedent or who live with the decedent may receive more than one share of the inheritance when the inheritance is distributed.

If an heir who has the ability and the capacity to support does not fulfill his obligation to support, the inheritance shall be distributed without or less.

Where the heirs agree through consultation, it may also be unequal.

The legal provisions in this regard are too far from morality. Supporting the elderly, but also being divided into family property, what bullshit law!

Sue him, she does not have an advantage, and the law is also humane.

The eldest brother did not fulfill the obligation to provide for the elderly, so he did not have much advantage

Hello! You can go to the notary office to notarize the gift contract, and then go to the housing authority to go through the transfer procedures. If you are satisfied with my answer, the answer will be praised, and if you have any legal questions, you can also come to my law studio to consult me, your affirmation is the greatest encouragement to me!

It is important to think of other ways to help after refusal.

It's hard to get over face, but if you really don't want to live in your house, there's no way, so if you refuse, just refuse.

If you refuse, it must be wrong, think about it, if your own sibling is sick and your mother wants to stay in your house for a while to take care of her (him), will you refuse?

That's right, but it's better not to say no because of the relationship.

Just another mother-in-law, and now a sister-in-law! Is your whole family sick?

I don't want to, but I don't think I should say no. Everyone has a time when they encounter difficulties and ask for help, let alone someone who is so close.

If I did, I would have refused, but that would have been called unfilial.

That's right, I don't like people like that.

According to the court certificate, the house could have completely rejected his sister's request.

She is your sister and your parents' child, he should have a share in the law, since she is your sister, you can give her a share! After all, it is the house that your parents bought, and you don't buy it yourself, the most important thing for people is to rely on themselves.

Your sister has the same right to inherit your parents' property as you.

The house issue is a true reflection of the moral nature of human beings.

Legal proceedings are the best way to go, and a peaceful solution is preferable.

It depends on who your parents are with, if your parents are with you, you can fight back.

If the head of the household is you, you can burn it all. Of course, you can't cook rice on the side. If not, it is a crime.