Which several version of Chai Liu s pathos is the best?

1. Muravinsky conducts the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra version, DG, CD no. 419 745-2 (Tchaikovsky Symphonies No. 4-6), and "Penguin" reviews three stars.

2. Chelibidazi conducts the Munich Philharmonic Orchestra Edition, ENI, CD No. CDC 5 56523-2

3. Karajan conducts the Berliner Philharmoniker Edition, DG, CD no. 453 088-2 (cheap little double sheet, Tchaikovsky's Symphonies No. 4-6), and Penguin with three stars. Karajan conducts the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra Edition, DG, CD No. 439 020-2 (Gold Edition), and "Penguin" reviews three stars and retains one star.

4. Pletnev conducts the Russian National Symphony Orchestra version, Virgin, CD number VC7 59661-2 (+ Tchaikovsky's "Slavic March"), Penguin" review three-star with flowers.

5. Giulini conducts the Philharmonic Orchestra Edition, EMI, CD No. CES5 68537-2 (+ Tchaikovsky's Romeo and Juliet, Swan Lake, Sleeping Beauty, The Nutcracker), and Penguin, three stars.

6. Chansons conducts the Oslo Philharmonic Orchestra Edition, Chandos, CD number Chan8446, Penguin" reviews three stars.

7. Svetlanov conducts the USSR State Symphony Orchestra version, BMG Melodiya, CD number 74321 17097-2.

8. Doratti conducts the London Symphony Orchestra Edition, Mercury, CD 434 352-2 (+ Tchaikovsky's Romeo and Juliet), and Penguin reviews three stars and retains one star.

1: Celli Pydak conducts the Munich Philharmonic version, the best version in his personal eyes, the real pathos 2: The swan song of the great conductor Frichay, second only to Chelly in his personal eyes, Frichay, who has little time to live, interprets that pathos and nostalgia to the fullest.

3: The Muravinsky version, which is generally considered to be the most authentic of his old chai, but ranks third in my heart.

The above Celli and Muravinsky versions are 320k ***, and Frichay is 192k ***

Furtwängler's Chai Six is sincere and touching, Karajan's merits are mild, Mulavinsky's Chai Six is the most classic version - almost unsurpassed, Frichai's version is his interpretation at the end of his life so it has extraordinary significance, Bernstein's version is the slowest - has an unusual dramatic tension, Chelibidak's ultra-slow version can be said to be the best of all the versions that embodies "sadness", and the tone of Jansons's version is excellent.

I have all versions except Foote and Karajan. Personally, I think that Mu Lao's version is the closest to death, and Chelly's version is the closest to the soul of the dead.

The imported version of general art is relatively good, about 40-50 yuan. It's best to buy the recommended version of the original, Mercury's version based on a 1960 recording, with the track Romeo and Juliet Fantasia. Discography: Mercury 4343532

Imported, at least more than a hundred, once wanted to buy Zhang Gothenburg very, very much, but think about it, forget it, there is no money. Domestic, a few dollars for piracy, the genuine Karajan doesn't seem to be playing. Or use the donkey to get the old card of the firewood six (of course, you have to ape), after burning with a light engraving recorder, choose a good ** carved into this CD disk, it seems to be no different from the genuine, and then add exquisite packaging, this is also a good choice, it is expected to be done within 30 yuan.

Shanghai ** Publishing House has an imported DG version, 49 yuan (in addition, there are excerpts from Swan Lake in this CD).

The domestic imported version is generally garbage.

It's better to buy the original.

If you want 50 yuan, take a look at some second-hand discs in the forum.

Now there are DG and China Import and Export Corporation and out seems to be 45 sheets.

Check it out

I checked it for you, and it was on Dangdang (a large domestic online bookstore).

**Don't wait, you can buy it at the price you said, and now when you are doing activities, there is free shipping.

Go check it out, o(o

Go to **.com, eBay online to see!

Celli Munich Philharmonic Warner EMI Edition. A real tragedy.

Chai Jiao 456

Mulavinsky conducts the Leningrad Philharmonic.

No, no, no, children, you are so naïve, this is Tchaikovsky's "Romeo and Juliet" fantasy overture.

It's certainly not Chai Liu's pathos. I haven't heard this tune, but the style is Russian, either Lao Chai or Rachmaninov.

This is Tchaikovsky's piece, but not his Symphony of Pathétiques, but his Symphonic Overture to Romeo and Juliet.

Tchaikovsky's Romeo and Juliet Fantasy Overture.

Symphony No. 1 "Giants".

Second Symphony Resurrection.

The Sixth Symphony is tragic.

Symphony Nocturne Nocturne.

Symphony No. 8 "Thousand People".

Clause. Numbers three, four, five, and nine have no titles

You can click on it to find out.

Hehe, I think the "best movement" is the best movement, right?

Brahms First: I like the second movement the most, the loneliness and warmth of Brahms's later works have begun to take shape, especially when the secondary section is reappeared, the echo of the horn is unforgettable, and at the same time foreshadows the "horn of the Alps" in the fourth movement - freedom in the mountains.

Brahms Fourth: Favorite Fourth Movement, Passacaria. Such a rich work, only this deep variation can be overwhelming, maintaining the solemn character of this work.

From the point of view of the movement itself, the thirty-two variations are cleverly transformed into four variations, and the technique is purely natural, and of course the best.

Tchaikovsky Fourth: Favorite third movement, scherzo. The peripheral plucked strings were done with pure plucked strings, which was a great innovation in history, and very successful, and influenced later composers, such as the plucked strings of the second movement in Debussy's String Quartet.

Tchaikovsky Sixth: Favorite Fourth Movement. Lao Chai challenges the extreme of harmonic instability here, the descending scale of the main part is endlessly low, and the secondary melody is one of Lao Chai's most famous melodies.

The Adagio format of the fourth movement is also a breakthrough. It was the first truly tragic symphony.

In fact, the symphony has both a certain integrity and a certain independence. Otherwise, there would not be so many movements to be played alone, such as Mozart's 3rd movement of 39, Beethoven's 3rd movement of 4, and so on. I had a very different view from the upstairs.

The reason why Bo1 is called "Bey 10" is not because of his slow movement, but because his first and fourth movements, especially the first movement, are a good display of Brahms's style and technique, and you must have spent most of his time conceiving the first movement after spending 21 years writing this symphony. Bo 4 is more agreeable. The third and fourth of Chai 4 are good.

However, Chai Liuke disagreed, indeed, the author was innovative in his conception, but it was definitely impossible to talk about it if it sounded good. The first movement presents the theme of pathos, with a good main melody. The waltz of the second movement is the best and is often played alone.

The third movement is also very good. Overall, Bo 1 and Chai 6 are among my top 10 favorite symphonies.

The symphony is an inseparable whole, and there is no such thing as a "best movement", at most it can only be said that "such and such a movement is more famous". Symphonies are played at large-scale Western conferences, usually in their entirety, in order to appreciate the integrity. Therefore, those who love symphonic ** must abandon the concept of "the best movement".

I love the three of Chai 6 and the 4 of Chai 5. It's a pity that Chai Si hasn't heard it, but I recommend Chai's string serenade, all of which are good!

Very much with the view from upstairs. You have to listen to the whole song, or you just want to see the leopard in the tube.