Is CRT better than TPV or ViewSonic better?

I feel like the TPV is a little better.

An Internet café near me used ViewSonic CRT19-inch one for just over 1 year. There are a lot of screens that are blurry. Estimated need to be adjusted out of the box.

The display is an indispensable part of the computer, and nowadays, whether it is the best propaganda or business speculation, almost all of them focus on the LCD display. CRT was once hailed as a "sunset" industry and will be eliminated. However, from the global display sales product distribution, CRT still occupies nearly 60% of the market share, CRT compared with LCD, its advantage is higher definition and more realistic color, and the most plain and close to the people, which is acceptable to the majority of consumers.

In particular, special industries such as Internet cafes, architectural design and education still prefer to buy CRT monitors to a large extent. The remote, underdeveloped areas with weak purchasing power also provide a broader market space for CRT. It is foreseeable that despite the rapid development of LCD, CRT is bound to continue to exist for a considerable period of time.

The advent of AOC IU technology will better build consumer confidence at the market level; For other display companies, it has also opened up an enlightening idea for CRT to continue to implement technological innovation, which is conducive to encouraging them to take new actions to jointly promote the sustainable and healthy development of the display industry and push the development of CRT to a new and higher market stage.

It is also worth mentioning that new technologies also have direct social and economic benefits. For example, the function of high efficiency, environmental protection and energy saving is a function of IU technology that is very in line with the requirements of the times. The high-efficiency green energy circuit design of IU technology reduces the power consumption to a new low point, and the maximum power of the 17-inch CRT is only 58W, while the power is even less than 50W in normal operation.

Taking an Internet café with 100 machines as an example, assuming that each machine works for an average of 10 hours a day, the electricity saved in a year is about (75-58) * 100 * 10 * 365 1000 = 6205 kWh. Energy conservation and environmental protection are an important topic in today's society, and the birth of IU technology is in line with the requirements of the trend of the times.

On the other hand, the successful advent of IU technology and the launch of related products have further improved and enriched the AOC technical system.

Relevant technical experts in the industry said, "If the 'free technology' launched by AOC was more focused on LCD, then IU technology will be an important technical label for AOC TPV, especially for CRT." AOC Duan Zhenhua said: "Everything is just the beginning.

Despite some achievements, we believe that there is still a long way to go in terms of technology. Only when the 'attentive and focused' AOC is never satisfied and keeps an eye on the cutting-edge needs of consumers, will it truly and forever 'lead the vision'. ”

ViewSonic should be better! TPV is cost-effective!

ViewSonic is the No. 1 selling brand in Europe and the United States, how to compare with TPV, and Miacasa, a sub-brand of ViewSonic, is also much better than TPC.

Every brand has good and bad, and I personally think that Samsung displays are good, hehe

Theoretically, ViewSonic is it. Both the workmanship and the reputation of the brand are good.

But what I'm saying is that in terms of actual effect, there is no difference between the two. ViewSonic may be a slightly finer workmanship of the shell. It's all pretty much the same in terms of LCD panels. However, the AOC is cheaper.

I am in the LCD industry, ViewSonic and TPV are just assembly plants, that is, the LCD screen plus circuit board is encapsulated with a shell, and the core technology is still in the LCD screen, but consumers can't see the brand of the LCD screen.

I've been to a lot of LCD assembly plants, and TPV has a good production scale.

I feel better, right?,But if it's an LCD monitor, I recommend ASUS,Although ASUS display is a miscellaneous brand,But as far as I shot non-Lipu,ViewSonic and so on, LCD or ASUS so far haven't let me find anything wrong。

It's ViewSonic good, but I don't like the look.

ViewSonic heard that it is a brand, and the products all depend on OEM, and Guanjie will give ViewSonic OEM.

The landlord, of course, is ViewSonic good, ViewSonic is among the top few in the display industry, the color is good, ** is also moderate, TPV mainly relies on price, TPV's display is very cheap, but the color is far inferior to ViewSonic .

Pretty much the same. It's all a good brand. Most reviews also rank AOC and ViewSonic as first-line monitors.

Don't think about it, it must be ViewSonic good, AOC has always been the most ordinary product, the quality has never been good, no matter how you get it now

ViewSonic is an old brand, although the quality is not very good, but it is much stronger than AOC There is no comparison ViewSonic ** is also relatively low, but it is still a little higher than AOC There are very few high-quality products on the market now, and the only one that can be considered is Samsung, although Samsung's is not very good!

The current situation, the display is seriously shrinking After the production of Trilon display tubes, there is no longer any CRT that can be used Only choose LCD, Samsung's can choose, **cheaper, although some other brands are cheaper, but many can't be used unless you think your eyes are not picky at all!

Graphics cards, game cards, image and color are very poor!! , only speed and no quality!!

Just looking at the brand can't explain anything, you have to carefully observe the display yourself, and it's easy to see the difference in comparison.

Each manufacturer will have products that focus on the low, mid, and high-end markets, and now, the performance of displays at the same price point is basically similar.

ViewSonic is a more famous brand, a few years ago, it can be said to be synonymous with professional-grade displays, real high-quality, but now in order to compete for low-end market share with other brands, it has to be reduced, of course, the quality has also been reduced. (A few years ago, ViewSonic did not have less than 3000 yuan, and now the low-end of ViewSonic below 2000 looks not much better than other products at the same price).

AOC is also a well-known domestic brand, and now it should be a lot of progress, remember that none of the AOC monitors in the past can ensure that the four corners are well focused.

Again, picking a monitor is a very subjective thing, you must see it in person, and the suggestions given by others can only be used as a reference, after all, this thing is what you want to use.

If you choose Yoponic at the same price,The quality of the panel is much better than AOC,AOC is the world's first shipment volume created by low price + OEM,The actual sales volume is not very large,Most of the people who buy AOC are the standard configuration of the computer city installed to fool the rookie。 There is also HKC as standard in the computer city. People who really understand computers will never choose AOC at the same price.

There is no need to ask this question, ViewSonic must be better, this is relative to Guanjie, but the two gaps are not the imaginary difference between domestic and imported, AOC should be said to be better than LG's, and the cost performance is also high.

This can be said It must be ViewSonic Sa Youponic is said to be a color expert Things are better than not good, take them out and do a comparison to know 2 monitors put together to see the picture to know who is good **It is also ViewSonic more expensive Color is good Quality Excellent Quality Pack for three years Plus 800** It's hard to be cheap.

Can't say it's that ***.

There may also be defective products in the same brand and batch of displays.

Different brands of monitors have different characteristics.

But I feel better than ViewSonic .

The premise is an LCD monitor.

AOC and ViewSonic are good! I personally love ViewSonic ! My ViewSonic VX2035

ViewSonic ViewSonic is slightly higher on **, about 5% or so.

Brands have a main market, and the low-end products of high-end brands are not necessarily better than low-end market brands, and they are not affordable. It also depends on the specific price, specific needs and uses.

ViewSonic is obviously better than AOC and I sell computers.

Friends can go to the second-hand market and say that you want to sell a ViewSonic monitor and AOC, ask which of the two is worth it, and you will know.

It is recommended to use TPV, first of all, ViewSonic my friend bought it and it broke down within a few days, although it was cheap but not good, Samsung was too expensive, only TPV was cost-effective and good.

Philips's better!

I bought 3* and philips in 02, and the effect of 3* is much worse than that of p.

TPV and ViewSonic see Internet cafes are used a lot, and there are many bad ones.

Samsung's effect is good, but it is more expensive!

TPV's is more affordable, and it has a three-year warranty.

It's all good, the key depends on the bandwidth of the specific model and the best resolution supported CRT is currently recognized as the best Sony's.

I feel good about ViewSonic good! I use AOC.,I don't feel as good as ViewSonic good.,Self-opinion!

TPV is better, in addition to being the largest display manufacturer, Philips China is manufactured by him, the most important thing is good after-sales service, three years of free door-to-door, because Fuqing has a factory, I don't know if you are from Fujian, this is the situation in Fujian, the region may; There are differences, the workmanship should be about the same, and there should be little difference.

I just installed it here in Wenzhou, and it seems that there are more AOCs in **, and ViewSonic basically can't see it. I bought Felip 20SW8

of 1800 blocks.

It seems that AOC is the world's largest display manufacturer.

Big brother, ask questions about whether it is good or not, naïve.

First choice Samsung followed by LG Philips again AOC other recommendations do not consider.

AOC here is the first place in China, and I don't know what to think about ViewSonic good!

It is recommended not to use Samsung's, the repair rate is too high.

Are you using it?

I just use Samsung, how does it feel good!

ViewSonic doesn't have many high-end, and dell's can also be considered!

Of course, ViewSonic is good, don't use AOC.

The best is Samsung's, followed by Philips and LG's.

It's all pretty much the same. Just look good on the test machine.

It is recommended not to use Samsung's, the repair rate is too high.

Oh, Samsung is not professional perhaps, but it has the largest sales.

Personally, I recommend LG, which is physically flat. It's not as unpleasant as other visual flats.

Philips, the one in the Lenovo display is Philips's.

AOC is really rubbish, lie to you to be a pig!

I use Lenovo, I don't know which factory made it? Lenovo doesn't make a monitor itself.