What is the difference between the education of ancient sages and contemporary education?

The so-called education of ancient sages is very different from contemporary education, because the education of ancient sages is to educate those who read and serve the emperor, but the words of contemporary education are to let us become qualified people, moral people, and contribute to our society, so the two are different.

Ancient education, its scope is relatively narrow, that is to say, there are fewer things to learn, especially women, women basically did not learn in ancient times, and in modern times, boys and girls will learn equally, and we are now exposed to a wide range of knowledge, and the content of learning is also very broad.

In my opinion, there is still a big difference between the education of ancient sages and contemporary education, the education of ancient sages only teaches children, and those who know it, while contemporary education teaches children to develop holistically, so that children will become particularly excellent in both knowledge and physical aspects.

The ancient Bible education is the history and charm of classical culture, so there will be different differences in the way of contemporary education, contemporary education is more advanced and avant-garde, whether it is ideologically or ideally completely different, so the gap between them is also very large.

Personally, I feel that the education of ancient sages was to educate people with words, just to reason with people, but now the words of education are more diversified, and you can carry out text education and practical education, so that contemporary education is better and easier for people to absorb.

Maybe the original intention is about the same, they all want to hand over a talent and cultivation are the best talents, but maybe the method or concept is different, the ancient sage education mainly focuses on those big truths, and then will not want all-round development of talents, but contemporary education focuses on a person's overall quality and overall ability.

There are some educational methods in ancient China that are worth learning from.

The first is the importance of environmental edification to education.

Everyone knows the story of Meng's mother's three migrations. During the Warring States period, there was a great scholar Mencius.

Mencius was very naughty when he was young, and his mother spent a lot of effort to get him a good education, and moved from the cemetery and the market to the school, and from then on, Mencius began to become orderly, polite, and fond of reading. Later, everyone used "Meng's mother and three moves" to indicate that people should be close to good people, things, and things in order to learn good habits!

So in today's society, this kind of education is also applicable, children are born like a blank piece of paper, the future work is a beautiful landscape painting, or an elegant ink painting will be affected by the acquired environment, so parents in the education of children often ask their children to make friends, around are love to learn and motivated friends, their children will also be positive, if there is a group of friends who do not learn without skills, their children will not be interested in learning. The so-called "those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black" is this truthThe second type: teach by example.

It means to teach in words and lead by example in action, which means that words and acts play an exemplary role. The so-called parents are the first teachers of the child is this truth, parents at home not only to reason with the child, but more importantly, to actively demonstrate, a good demonstration can make the child form a good living habits and character, on the contrary, negative demonstration is not conducive to the healthy growth of the child.

A child sitting in the back seat, happily playing with his toys. Then the child threw a small pushpin on the toy out of the window, and the father immediately got out of the car and carefully searched for the small pushpin thrown away by the child, and after looking for a long time, he finally found it. The father picked it up and went back to the car.

Before the father could open his mouth to educate the child, the child had already lowered his head in shame. This shows that instead of talking about children at length, it is better to teach by example. On the contrary, if a parent does not care for the environment and throws away garbage, then, one day, if the child has garbage in his hand, he will also throw it away, because parents demonstrate it this way.

The third is to pay attention to quality education

Ancient people attached great importance to the quality, and their utilitarianism was not so strong, many people were studying hard for ten years, and they may finally be admitted to the top prize, but they did not complain, they would not rush for fame and fame, in the current education, due to various reasons, parents and teachers attach too much importance to the scores, thus ignoring the quality of education, and also leading to the emergence of a lot of "nerds" who can only read and not live in society.

Fourth: teach students according to their aptitude.

Teaching students according to their aptitude refers to teaching according to the cognitive level and learning ability of different students.

As well as their own qualities, teachers choose learning methods that are suitable for the characteristics of each student.

Nowadays, teaching students according to their aptitude is of practical significance to teachers, parents, schools, etc., and different teaching groups adopt different ways and methods, which can stimulate people's potential to the greatest extent and make full use of teaching resources.

The ancients attached great importance to the influence of the educational environment on children. The ancients attached great importance to filial piety and respecting teachers, as well as Confucius's proposal to teach students according to their aptitude, as well as teaching by word and deed. Where there is a will, there is a way, and so on.

For example, the head cantilever cone thorn thorn can cultivate students' hard-working spirit, and at the same time, it can also make students more eager to learn, which is of great help to students' success.

In modern and ancient education, one teacher teaches multiple students, and they all have to go to a fixed school to receive education; The difference is that there is a difference between the rational concept of education and the stupid luck of education, and the core file of the brigade is different, maybe the ancient education teaches the four books and the five classics and some etiquette content, but the current education involves more abundant content, such as Chinese, mathematics, English, politics, history, and so on.

I think that the similarities between modern education and ancient church brother education are that they are conducive to improving the quality of some people, and that they are cultivating talents for the country; If you don't have the right points, it is because of the ancient educational viewpoint, the comparison is restrictive, so it limits the imagination of many people, which is not conducive to the brilliance of others, but modern education will pay more attention to the shaping of personal comprehensive knowledge.

I think that the first is that the viewpoint of teaching students according to their aptitude and learning to make good use of them in modern education is the same as that of our ancient Confucian education methods. However, in ancient times, women would be taught that no talent was virtue, and today's education has become more open, and women can also learn according to their own strength; Secondly, today's education is more developed, and the educational thinking is more open, he will not require that the teacher must be a teacher, there should be a better teacher-student relationship between teachers, and secondly, we Pei Ji modern macro stupidity with some teaching resources are relatively rich, relatively compared to ancient times, some civilian students can also enter the school.

(1) Ancient education had a class character, but modern education has no class character.

2) The detachment of ancient education is obvious, while modern education cannot be detached.

3) Education was not popularized in ancient times, burying most of the talents.

Differences: Ancient education was more of a tool for the ruler to send talents, which greatly limited the initiative of individual supervisors, which was not conducive to the production of that kind of talent. Modern education focuses on the shaping of a comprehensive knowledge system for the individual.

Similarities: It is conducive to improving the quality of the people and improving their spiritual life. Cultivating talents for the country.

Similarities: all for the promotion of talents. Differences: The concept of education is different, and the content of the assessment is very different.

In ancient times, most of the education was taught by the elders through practical activities and word of mouth, "teaching, what is given and what is given is effective"; "Raising children, raising children to do good", education is the meaning of teaching and cultivating. It's filial piety. Modern education is the education of scientific skills. The disadvantage is that there are many talented people without virtue.

As far as the stages of education are concerned, we all know that there are three stages of education in ancient traditional education: family education - the key lies in parents, teaching the way of life; Private school education - the key lies in the teacher, teaching the way of the saints; Apprenticeship education – the key is the master, teaching the way to make a living. And modern education, I think it consists of only two stages:

Family education stage and school education stage. Ancient Chinese education mainly taught cultural things, but now it also includes the knowledge of natural sciences. In other words, traditional education in ancient times was more about linking people's material and spiritual needs, while modern education was more about material conditions.

In addition, there are institutional differences.